Government backing has become a new variable in mining economics. With nearly US$40 billion in mineral deals already on the books, that shift is also putting a spotlight on who stands to gain.

Vladimir / Adobe Stock
The Trump administration’s aggressive push to secure critical minerals, expand domestic energy production and build out artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure is reshaping the US resource investment landscape.
At the same time, these moves are placing renewed scrutiny on members of the Trump family who operate in sectors that are positioned to benefit from those policy priorities.
The overlap does not, by itself, establish wrongdoing or prove that government policy has been shaped to benefit the president’s family. In several cases, however, the timing and structure of Trump family investments have raised questions from ethics experts, lawmakers and investigative journalists about whether the traditional boundary between public policy and private business is becoming increasingly blurred.
The issue is particularly relevant for mining, where the Trump administration has moved beyond conventional grants and loans toward direct government investments, strategic partnerships and permit acceleration efforts.
Since January 2025, the administration says it has approved or signed 160 minerals deals totaling almost US$40 billion. President Donald Trump has also directed federal agencies to streamline mining approvals, while the White House has framed domestic mineral production as essential to economic competitiveness and national security.
That policy shift has created an environment in which companies with exposure to critical minerals, processing and strategic materials are increasingly competing for federal capital and government support.
A rare earths connection
One of the clearest examples involves Vulcan Elements, a North Carolina-based rare earths magnet producer.
In 2025, the US Department of Defense announced a US$700 million financing package for Vulcan as part of a broader effort to develop domestic alternatives to Chinese rare earths supply chains.
The company subsequently became the subject of scrutiny after ProPublica reported that 1789 Capital, an investment firm associated with Donald Trump Jr., had taken an undisclosed stake in Vulcan approximately three months before the Pentagon announced the financing. According to ProPublica, the transaction was particularly notable because the Pentagon loan was reportedly linked to intervention from the White House.
“The call came from the White House: We have to get this done," a person familiar with the process said.
The reporting does not establish that Donald Trump Jr. influenced the Pentagon's decision or that the president directed the financing because of his son's investment. However, the overlap illustrates why the administration's expanding use of direct investment in strategic industries has attracted heightened attention.
Vulcan operates in a sector at the center of Trump's industrial strategy. Rare earth magnets are essential to a range of technologies, including defense systems, electric motors and advanced electronics, while China's dominance of the rare earths supply chain has become a major geopolitical concern for Washington.
The administration has increasingly treated the development of domestic mineral supply chains as a national security priority. August Reuters report notes that the Department of Energy is preparing US$500 million in grants for projects involving lithium, cobalt, and battery materials, including a US$100 million grant to Jervois for a US cobalt refinery.
The White House has also announced billions of dollars in mining and processing initiatives, including investments in rare earths, magnet technology and mining education.
For junior miners and critical minerals developers, the result is a dramatic change in the role of government.
Federal support is increasingly viewed not simply as a source of funding, but also as a potential catalyst capable of reducing project risk, attracting private capital and accelerating development.
The role of the government in the mining sector has been a hot topic at several mineral and raw materials conferences this year, with many analysts and market watchers noting that this type of partnership is needed to combat China’s dominance in the battery and technology metals segments.
During a panel focused on the impact of US midterm elections and geopolitics at Fastmarkets' Global Lithium, Battery & Critical Materials conference, held this past June, Ken Hoffman, founder and CEO of Traubenbach Associates, pointed to the industries the government has aided in the past.
“There would be no Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) if the government didn't bail it out, but we've bailed out the banking industry. We've bailed out the auto industry. We've done this for a long time,” he said. “The government does have a role.”
Gary Stanley, managing director of Global Mineral Strategies and a 41 year veteran of the US Department of Commerce, where he last led the Office of Critical Minerals and Metals, also acknowledged the unique position domestic supply chains are in. He commented:
“This is a form of sector‑specific state capitalism … As a free trader and as a dyed‑in‑the‑wool capitalist I’m not enthused about that, but we have an opponent who plays by none of the rules … whether it involves some degree of hybrid government intervention along with capitalistic capabilities, something has to be embraced … business as usual is not going to cut it."
A broader shift in the role of government
The critical minerals sector is becoming one of the most significant examples of this new approach.
The Trump administration has backed companies involved in lithium, cobalt, rare earths, magnets and battery recycling, while also considering policies such as price floors, government procurement agreements and equity investments.
Reuters reported in 2025 that critical minerals companies were rapidly expanding lobbying efforts in Washington as the federal government increased its willingness to provide direct financial support to mining and processing projects.
Companies have sought funding, permitting assistance and long-term government purchasing agreements, creating a more competitive environment for access to federal support.
For the resource sector, the implications extend beyond the Trump family's specific investments.
The administration's policies are fundamentally changing how mining projects are financed and developed in the US. Government backing can now influence everything from a project's cost of capital to its ability to secure private financing and negotiate offtake agreements.
Former government officials are also finding their way into the resource sector after leaving public service. In June, NovaRed Mining (CSE:NRED,OTCQB:NREDF) appointed Kristi Noem, former US secretary of homeland security, as a strategic advisor, citing her "extensive experience spanning economic development, infrastructure, energy, agriculture, national security, and public-private collaboration."
The pattern extends beyond Noem.
Ryan Zinke, Trump's first secretary of the interior, joined the board of US Gold (NASDAQ:USAU) in 2019 shortly after leaving government, an early example of the same revolving-door dynamic now playing out across the sector.
He currently serves as a US congressman representing Montana.
The relationship between government service and mining company access also runs the other way, through lobbying rather than board seats. David Bernhardt, who led the Department of the Interior during Trump's first term as president, now runs a lobbying firm staffed largely by former interior officials.
According to Public Citizen, a government watchdog group, the firm represents mining clients including Barrick Mining (TSX:ABX,NYSE:B), BHP (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) and USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ:USAR) and made 33 visits to the Department of the Interior in 2025 alone.
Scrutiny of the Vulcan Elements deal, meanwhile, has moved into Congress.
House Democrats Jared Huffman and Robert Garcia have demanded documents from Vulcan identifying which 1789 Capital contacts were involved in the government's investment process, describing the deal as part of "a troubling pattern of opaque, multi-million-dollar deals with politically connected companies." Vulcan's leadership has pushed back on the implication, with the company's CEO stating he has never met Donald Trump Jr.
Resource investing enters new political era
For investors, the bigger story may be the transformation taking place in the resource sector itself.
Critical minerals are no longer simply a commodity investment theme driven by supply and demand. They have become an increasingly political asset class, shaped by industrial policy, national security concerns and competition with China.
The Trump administration's willingness to deploy loans, grants, government investments and strategic partnerships is creating new opportunities for mining and processing companies. But it is also creating new questions about who gains access to that support and how investment decisions are made.
For a sector accustomed to focusing on geology, commodity prices and project economics, political connections and government capital may now be becoming another factor investors cannot afford to ignore.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
From Your Site Articles
- Trump Admin Unveils US$2 Billion Push for US Critical Minerals Supply ›
- Critical Minerals Face Election Year Reckoning as US Races to Outpace China ›
- "No Realer Thing Than Critical Minerals" — US Proposes Price Floors, Preferential Trade Zone ›
- Trump Unveils Plan for US$12 Billion Critical Minerals Stockpile ›
- Trump Orders Security Probe on Rare Earths and Critical Minerals Imports ›
Related Articles Around the Web
https://x.com/INN_Resource
https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgia-williams-15845447/
gwilliams@investingnews.com
The Conversation (0)
Originally from Calgary, Georgia has been right at home in Toronto for more than two decades. Graduating from the University of Toronto with an honors BA in journalism, she is passionate about writing on diverse topics, including resources, arts, politics and social issues.
At INN Georgia covers a wide range of topics, including energy, battery and critical metals and diamonds. In her spare time, Georgia enjoys watching documentaries and experiencing Toronto's vibrant food, arts and cultural scene.
At INN Georgia covers a wide range of topics, including energy, battery and critical metals and diamonds. In her spare time, Georgia enjoys watching documentaries and experiencing Toronto's vibrant food, arts and cultural scene.
INN Article Notification
Latest News
Outlook Reports world
Featured Critical Minerals Investing Stocks
Browse Companies
MARKETS
COMMODITIES
CURRENCIES
Originally from Calgary, Georgia has been right at home in Toronto for more than two decades. Graduating from the University of Toronto with an honors BA in journalism, she is passionate about writing on diverse topics, including resources, arts, politics and social issues.
At INN Georgia covers a wide range of topics, including energy, battery and critical metals and diamonds. In her spare time, Georgia enjoys watching documentaries and experiencing Toronto's vibrant food, arts and cultural scene.
Learn about our editorial policies.


