INN spoke with companies and analysts to find out what long term implications the Section 232 investigation may have on the uranium sector.
In 2018, the US Secretary of Commerce initiated a Section 232 investigation into foreign uranium imports and their effect on national security.
The issue was raised by Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR,NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) and Ur-Energy (TSX:URE,NYSEAMERICAN:URG) — US-based miners concerned that uranium sourced from around the world may be of inferior quality and could pose a national security risk.
On Sunday (April 14), the US Department of Commerce submitted a report on its investigation to the White House, leaving President Donald Trump 90 days to respond to its recommendations.
Part of the discussion around Section 232 entails the US implementing a 25 percent domestic quota on all uranium used in the country.
At the 2019 Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention, held in March, the Investing New Network (INN) spoke with Energy Fuels, IsoEnergy (TSXV:ISO,OTCQX:ISENF) and NexGen Energy (TSX:NXE,NYSEAMERICAN:NXE), as well as industry experts Nick Carter of UxC and Mercenary Geologist Mickey Fulp, to find out how the investigation has impacted the uranium sector and what the decision could ultimately mean for the market in the US and abroad.
For all of INN’s PDAC coverage, check out our PDAC 2019 playlist.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Editorial Disclosure: Energy Fuels and IsoEnergy are clients of the Investing News Network. This article is not paid-for content.
The Investing News Network does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported in the interviews it conducts. The opinions expressed in these interviews do not reflect the opinions of the Investing News Network and do not constitute investment advice. All readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence.