Types of Iron Ore: Hematite vs. Magnetite

Iron ore is most often found in the form of hematite and magnetite. Learn what makes those types of iron ore different and make an informed investment.

types of iron ore

Did you know that there are different types of iron ore? Iron is most often found in hematite and magnetite ores, though goethite, limonite and siderite ores are also common sources.

For investors interested in the iron ore space, it’s useful to know know the facts about hematite and magnetite ores. Both of those types of iron ore are rocks and minerals from which iron can be extracted. Here’s an overview of some basic information about hematite and magnetite ores, including what they are and where they’re found.

Types of iron ore: Hematite ore

Hematite ore is a direct-shipping ore with naturally high iron content. Because of its high iron content, hematite ore must undergo only a simple crushing, screening and blending process before being shipped off for steel production.

For that reason, hematite ore is important for many mining companies. As Australia’s Magnetite Network explains, “[d]irect shipping ores, when mined, typically have iron (Fe) content of between 56% Fe and 64% Fe … By comparison, magnetite ore typically has a much lower iron content when mined of between 25% and 40% Fe and in this form is unsuitable for steel making.”

Hematite ore is found in abundance throughout the world, but the most utilized deposits are in Brazil, Australia and Asia. Hematite ore has been the primary type of iron ore mined in Australia since the early 1960s. Approximately 96 percent of the continent’s iron ore exports are high-grade hematite ore, and the majority of its reserves are located in the Hamersley province of Western Australia. The mountainous Hamersley Range is at the center of hematite ore exploration and development because it sits on a banded iron formation.

Brazil is another one of the world’s main sources of this type of iron ore. Its Carajas mine is the largest iron ore mine in existence, and is operated by Brazilian mining company Vale (NYSE:VALE). Vale is the third-largest mining company in the world and the largest producer of iron ore pellets. Vale’s headquarters are in Rio de Janeiro, and its primary iron ore assets are in the Iron Quadrangle region of Minas Gerais.

In Asia, a great deal of mining for hematite ore is done in China. Known reserves include the Tung-Yeh-Chen hematite ore deposit and the Dongye hematite ore deposit.

Types of iron ore: Magnetite ore

The mineral magnetite actually has higher iron content than the mineral hematite. However, while hematite ore generally contains large concentrations of hematite, magnetite ore generally holds low concentrations of magnetite. As a result, this type of iron ore ore must be concentrated before it can be used to produce steel. Magnetite ore’s magnetic properties are helpful during this process.

While magnetite ore requires more treatment than hematite ore, end products made from magnetite ore are typically of higher quality than those produced from hematite ore. That’s because magnetite ore has fewer impurities than hematite more; in this way, the elevated cost of processing magnetite ore can be balanced out.

Magnetite ore is currently mined in Minnesota and Michigan in the US, as well as in taconite deposits in Eastern Canada. A major mining site in Michigan is the Marquette Range. The deposit was discovered in 1844, and ore was first mined there in 1848. Magnetite ore and hematite ore are among the four types of iron ore deposits found in this area.

In Minnesota, this type of iron ore is mined mainly in the Mesabi Range, one of the four ranges that make up the Iron Range of Minnesota. In Canada, Labrador is home to the majority of magnetite ore mining. In particular, mining companies focus on exploration and development in the iron-rich Labrador Trough.

Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE:CLF) is a major player in the magnetite ore mining industry, with five iron ore mines that are focused on magnetite ore. For instance, the Empire mine, located in Michigan’s Marquette Range, has an annual capacity of 4.5 million tons. Additionally, its Hibbing taconite mine is in Minnesota’s Mesabi Range and has an annual capacity of 8 million tons of magnetite ore.

This is an updated version of an article first published by the Investing News Network in 2013.

Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Shaw, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Get the Latest Iron Investing Stock Information

Get the latest information about companies associated with Iron Investing delivered directly to your inbox.

By selecting company or companies above, you are giving consent to receive email from those companies. And remember you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • The author has not done her research thoroughly enough : processing magnetite ores result in a significantly higher carbon footprint than with the processing of hematite ores.

    • Thanks for both comments. Mr. Newell, regarding hematite vs. magnetite and their greenhouse gas emissions, I refer you to The Magnetite Network. Admittedly this is a group representing Western Australia’s magnetite producers. According to an independent report posted on the group’s website, “Mining and beneficiation of magnetite ore is considerably more energy intensive than conventional direct shipping hematite operations in the Pilbara. As a consequence, magnetite concentrate production is more CO2 emissions intensive than direct shipping ore (DSO ) production.” (so you are correct there). But when entire life cycle emissions are considered (ground to steel), magnetite comes ahead of hematite, with a net savings of 108 kg CO2e per tonne of magnetite concentrate, as per the report. This is because emissions can be saved in overseas ironmaking operations- again, according to the report. If you find evidence to the contrary I would take a look at it.

      Best Regards,
      Andrew Topf, INN Senior Editor

  • If I remember my chemistry, %Fe in (pure) magnetite is 70% and is actually higher than the %Fe in (pure) haematite which is 67.5%. So the opening line in the section on magnetite above is perhaps misleading since it is not the chemical composition which is the difference. The difference is the level of impurities in magnetite deposits which are removed by magnetic seperation and then pelletising is needed to agglomerate the fine magnetite material. This gives a pellet which is more expensive than high grade haematites but with a higher %Fe as the author then correctly states.

    • Hematite Fe2O3 2/3 =66%, Magnetite Fe3O4 3/4 = 73%max so Magnetite is higher content Fe and lessor contamination content. Fe2O3 can be turned into Fe3O4 with heat to drive out contamination and convert molecular structure. Natural Magnetite is much better for iron production. This artical has everything backwards. Back to basic chemistry…

      • Teresa

        Hi there, thanks for commenting, and apologies for the error. You are, of course, correct – magnetite does have a higher iron content than Hematite. However, I believe the original offer failed to make the distinction between hematite and hematite ores (the same goes for magnetite). Hematite can occur in high-grade ores, referred to as direct-shipping ores, which have higher iron content than naturally occurring magnetite ores.

        Still, as you note and as the article states, iron produced from magnetite makes for a higher quality end-product.

  • “Hematite ore has the chemical formula Fe2O3 and has a very high iron content of 70 percent. … With the chemical formula Fe3O4, magnetite ore has much lower iron content than hematite ore.”

    No matter how I count it, Fe2/Fe2O3 comes as lower a mass fraction than Fe3/Fe3O4. So the statements above make little sense to me.

  • Atomic weights of Fe at 56 and oxygen at 16. In chemically pure minerals the percentage Fe in hematite Fe2O3 is 112/(112+48)=70%. Percentage Fe in magnetite Fe3O4 is 168/(168+64)=72.4%. In nature magnetite often contains impurities in the ore which makes the Fe content of mined ore lower than hematite. As stated the impurities in magnetite can be removed via processing often resulting in an Fe percentage higher than hematite.

  • Iron ore pellets are made from both magnetite and hematite ores. Hematite ores are concentrated using a flotation process. Pellets include a mineral binder that represents about 2% by weight. Much of the ore in pellets made from magnetite is oxidized to hematite during the high-temperature induration process that sets the binder. Induration is necessary to instill the durability necessary to support a blast furnace burden, and to mitigate fines generation during shipping & handling.

    Direct shipping lumpy ore is now very scarce. Fine iron ore must be agglomerated before being fed to a blast furnace either by pelletizing or sintering, which is normally done at the steel mill. Fine iron ore cannot be fed to a blast furnace, or it will plug. The burden b=must be sufficiently porous to allow the wind to penetrate the birden. Sintering also provides a means to recycle steel mill wastes, including pellet chips, pit scrap and BOF dust.

  • The two ores of iron are hematite and magnetite with the chemical formula Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 respectively. To determine which of the compounds has a higher percentage of iron per kilogram first the molar mass of the two compounds has to be determined.

    Iron has a molar mass of 55.845 g/mole and oxygen has a molar mass of 16 g/mole. The molar mass of Fe2O3 is 159.69 and that of Fe3O4 is 231.535. In hematite the percentage of iron by mass is `111.69/159.69 ~~ 69.9%` , similarly in magnetite the percentage of iron by mass is approximately 72.3%

    Magnetite has a higher percentage of iron per kilogram as compared to hematite.


Leave a Reply