- AustraliaNorth AmericaWorld
Investing News NetworkYour trusted source for investing success
- Lithium Outlook
- Oil and Gas Outlook
- Gold Outlook Report
- Uranium Outlook
- Rare Earths Outlook
- All Outlook Reports
- Top Generative AI Stocks
- Top EV Stocks
- Biggest AI Companies
- Biggest Blockchain Stocks
- Biggest Cryptocurrency-mining Stocks
- Biggest Cybersecurity Companies
- Biggest Robotics Companies
- Biggest Social Media Companies
- Biggest Technology ETFs
- Artificial Intellgience ETFs
- Robotics ETFs
- Canadian Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Artificial Intelligence Outlook
- EV Outlook
- Cleantech Outlook
- Crypto Outlook
- Tech Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
- Cannabis Weekly Round-Up
- Top Alzheimer's Treatment Stocks
- Top Biotech Stocks
- Top Plant-based Food Stocks
- Biggest Cannabis Stocks
- Biggest Pharma Stocks
- Longevity Stocks to Watch
- Psychedelics Stocks to Watch
- Top Cobalt Stocks
- Small Biotech ETFs to Watch
- Top Life Science ETFs
- Biggest Pharmaceutical ETFs
- Life Science Outlook
- Biotech Outlook
- Cannabis Outlook
- Pharma Outlook
- Psychedelics Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
3D Systems Will Challenge Arbitration Decision from 2011 Acquisition
3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) has announced that a decision has been reached from the private arbitration dispute which arose from the company’s acquisition of Print3D Corporation in 2011. 3D Systems has decided to challenge the decision in federal court.
3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) has announced that a decision has been reached from the private arbitration dispute which arose from the company’s acquisition of Print3D Corporation in 2011. 3D Systems has decided to challenge the decision in federal court.
According to the press release:
On August 23, 2013, a former Company employee filed a lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, alleging several causes of action related to the acquisition of Print3D Corporation (of which the former employee was a 50% shareholder). The lawsuit alleges that the Company breached a purchase agreement in order to avoid paying the former employee additional monies pursuant to earn out provisions in the agreement. The lawsuit was transferred to the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, which court compelled arbitration. The arbitration took place in June 2015 and on October 16, 2015, the arbitrator issued an award in favor of the former employee with respect to certain alleged breaches of contract and implied covenants by the Company. The arbitrator found that the Company did not commit fraud or make any negligent misrepresentations to the former employee.
Pursuant to the arbitral award, the Company is to pay approximately $11.3 million which includes actual damages of $7.3 million, fees and expenses of $2.3 million and prejudgment interest of $1.7 million.
Latest News
Investing News Network websites or approved third-party tools use cookies. Please refer to the cookie policy for collected data, privacy and GDPR compliance. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies.