- AustraliaNorth AmericaWorld
Investing News NetworkYour trusted source for investing success
- Lithium Outlook
- Oil and Gas Outlook
- Gold Outlook Report
- Uranium Outlook
- Rare Earths Outlook
- All Outlook Reports
- Top Generative AI Stocks
- Top EV Stocks
- Biggest AI Companies
- Biggest Blockchain Stocks
- Biggest Cryptocurrency-mining Stocks
- Biggest Cybersecurity Companies
- Biggest Robotics Companies
- Biggest Social Media Companies
- Biggest Technology ETFs
- Artificial Intellgience ETFs
- Robotics ETFs
- Canadian Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Artificial Intelligence Outlook
- EV Outlook
- Cleantech Outlook
- Crypto Outlook
- Tech Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
- Cannabis Weekly Round-Up
- Top Alzheimer's Treatment Stocks
- Top Biotech Stocks
- Top Plant-based Food Stocks
- Biggest Cannabis Stocks
- Biggest Pharma Stocks
- Longevity Stocks to Watch
- Psychedelics Stocks to Watch
- Top Cobalt Stocks
- Small Biotech ETFs to Watch
- Top Life Science ETFs
- Biggest Pharmaceutical ETFs
- Life Science Outlook
- Biotech Outlook
- Cannabis Outlook
- Pharma Outlook
- Psychedelics Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
Times Online reported that a federal judge has given the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 60 days to finalize federal coal ash regulations. The ruling was prompted by a suit filed against the EPA by a coalition of environmental groups — the members believe the agency has a “mandatory duty” to review and revise waste regulations every three years.
Times Online reported that a federal judge has given the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 60 days to finalize federal coal ash regulations. The ruling was prompted by a suit filed against the EPA by a coalition of environmental groups — the members believe the agency has a “mandatory duty” to review and revise waste regulations every three years.
As quoted in the market news:
In 2010, the EPA proposed two options to regulate coal ash: One that would regulate it as hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA; and one that would regulate it as non-hazardous waste, under Subtitle D of RCRA. But since then, officials say, little has been done.
‘EPA took public comments, held eight or nine public hearing across the country, received 450,000 comments and then did nothing,’ said Jared Saylor, campaign director for Earthjustice. ‘The lawsuit was intended to get them on a court-ordered deadline to finalize one of those options.’
Investing News Network websites or approved third-party tools use cookies. Please refer to the cookie policy for collected data, privacy and GDPR compliance. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies.