- AustraliaNorth AmericaWorld
Investing News NetworkYour trusted source for investing success
First Helium
Purpose Bitcoin ETF
Black Swan Graphene
Soma Gold Corp.
- Lithium Outlook
- Oil and Gas Outlook
- Gold Outlook Report
- Uranium Outlook
- Rare Earths Outlook
- All Outlook Reports
- Top Generative AI Stocks
- Top EV Stocks
- Biggest AI Companies
- Biggest Blockchain Stocks
- Biggest Cryptocurrency-mining Stocks
- Biggest Cybersecurity Companies
- Biggest Robotics Companies
- Biggest Social Media Companies
- Biggest Technology ETFs
- Artificial Intellgience ETFs
- Robotics ETFs
- Canadian Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Artificial Intelligence Outlook
- EV Outlook
- Cleantech Outlook
- Crypto Outlook
- Tech Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
- Cannabis Weekly Round-Up
- Top Alzheimer's Treatment Stocks
- Top Biotech Stocks
- Top Plant-based Food Stocks
- Biggest Cannabis Stocks
- Biggest Pharma Stocks
- Longevity Stocks to Watch
- Psychedelics Stocks to Watch
- Top Cobalt Stocks
- Small Biotech ETFs to Watch
- Top Life Science ETFs
- Biggest Pharmaceutical ETFs
- Life Science Outlook
- Biotech Outlook
- Cannabis Outlook
- Pharma Outlook
- Psychedelics Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
Last week, US President Donald Trump signed the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act, outlining the defense department’s budget for 2019. One caveat is being hailed as the largest development in the rare earths sector since 2010.
Last week, US President Donald Trump signed the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), outlining the defense department’s 2019 budget.
While most of the act is fairly standard, one caveat is being hailed as the largest development in the rare earths sector since 2010.
The 788-page document, which covers every aspect of the military, from the newly established Space Force (a branch of the Air Force) to the procurement of materials for weaponry, takes aim at Chinese materials and manufactured goods — specifically the country’s rare earth element (REE) magnets sector.
The US will no longer permit shipments of REE magnets produced in China into the country. Magnets manufactured in North Korea, Russia and Iran are also being targeted for embargo.
Rare earth magnets are considered the strongest type of permanent magnet available. They are used in computers, wind turbine generators, magnetic resonance imaging, electric vehicles and a variety of other machines and devices.
When it comes to the military, REE magnets are used in guidance and control systems, defense and electronic warfare, electric motors, targeting and weapons systems and communication, making them a vital resource for the American Armed Forces.
While that may seem like another page in the ongoing global trade war, there is a little bit more at play.
Citing national security as its motivation — similar to a uranium announcement made earlier this summer — the US has vowed to not procure any products or devices “containing a specialty metal not melted or produced in the United States[, including:] aircraft, missile and space systems, ships, tank and automotive items, weapon systems, or ammunition.”
“This year’s NDAA represents an important opportunity to implement an effective approach to confront a growing array of threats. The administration’s National Defense Strategy outlined a framework for identifying and prioritizing these threats,” said Senator John McCain, the namesake of the act.
“Through the NDAA, Congress is fulfilling its duty to help translate that strategy into policy and align resources to implement it,” he added.
China produced 105,000 MT of rare earths last year, accounting for the largest chunk of global production. Australia, Brazil and Russia account for much less at roughly 25,000 MT.
While rare earths exploration and production companies outside of China are thrilled about the announcement, some analysts believe the news will have less of an impact than the aluminum and tin tariffs from earlier this summer.
“This only restricts the Department of Defense from, one would presume, directly importing rare earths from China,” said Jon Hykway, president and director of Stormcrow Capital.
“That’s going to make it even harder for the very few groups in the US that play with magnets and rare earth oxides and metals to make a go of it, and open the door to companies in Japan and elsewhere that make magnets from Chinese rare earth oxides or metals to run those US companies over.”
As Hykway went on to note, the ban is not broad or specific enough to really impact China’s huge REE market. “This doesn’t keep the average US consumer from buying, for example, a made-in-China food processor with a permanent magnet motor in it, or from buying that hoverboard. It simply makes it harder for the Department of Defense to do anything.”
The move to ban imports of specific metals first began last summer, when the US government pledged US$40 million for ramped-up domestic exploration for REEs. The focus on REEs came after the Chinese-partnered acquisition of the sole American rare earths mine, Mountain Pass.
A subsequent US Senate report called for “commitments to purchase [domestic] strategic and critical materials, emphasizing an awareness of China’s dominance in the rare earths supply-demand setting.”
Even though the US is a large consumer of REEs, it is not the only country that uses the metals in a variety of ways.
When asked how this latest announcement will affect the supply chain, Hykway said, “[i]t probably doesn’t. The US was a small fraction of buying of Chinese rare earth oxides and metals, albeit a bigger destination of final product containing Chinese rare earths. But the US Department of Defense was almost none of that, anyway.”
Ultimately the REE ban may be more of a symbolic move towards domestic production than another trade issue between adversaries.
For Hykway, “it’s another typically scatterbrained tactic from the present US administration.”
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Editorial Disclosure: The Investing News Network does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported in the interviews it conducts. The opinions expressed in these interviews do not reflect the opinions of the Investing News Network and do not constitute investment advice. All readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence.
Investing News Network websites or approved third-party tools use cookies. Please refer to the cookie policy for collected data, privacy and GDPR compliance. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies.