- WORLD EDITIONAustraliaNorth AmericaWorld
Investing News NetworkYour trusted source for investing success
- Lithium Outlook
- Oil and Gas Outlook
- Gold Outlook Report
- Uranium Outlook
- Rare Earths Outlook
- All Outlook Reports
- Top Generative AI Stocks
- Top EV Stocks
- Biggest AI Companies
- Biggest Blockchain Stocks
- Biggest Cryptocurrency-mining Stocks
- Biggest Cybersecurity Companies
- Biggest Robotics Companies
- Biggest Social Media Companies
- Biggest Technology ETFs
- Artificial Intellgience ETFs
- Robotics ETFs
- Canadian Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Artificial Intelligence Outlook
- EV Outlook
- Cleantech Outlook
- Crypto Outlook
- Tech Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
- Cannabis Weekly Round-Up
- Top Alzheimer's Treatment Stocks
- Top Biotech Stocks
- Top Plant-based Food Stocks
- Biggest Cannabis Stocks
- Biggest Pharma Stocks
- Longevity Stocks to Watch
- Psychedelics Stocks to Watch
- Top Cobalt Stocks
- Small Biotech ETFs to Watch
- Top Life Science ETFs
- Biggest Pharmaceutical ETFs
- Life Science Outlook
- Biotech Outlook
- Cannabis Outlook
- Pharma Outlook
- Psychedelics Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
Aralez Shares District Court Decision to Uphold Patents
Aralez Pharmaceuticals announced the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey upheld the validity of two patents owned by a subsidiary of Aralez.
Aralez Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ARLZ; TSX:ARZ) announced the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey upheld the validity of two patents owned by a subsidiary of the company and licensed to several pharmaceutical companies and medical officers.
As quoted in the press release:
On April 21, 2011, July 25, 2011, and June 28, 2013, an Aralez subsidiary filed patent infringement lawsuits in District Court against Dr. Reddy’s, Lupin, and Mylan, respectively, related to Abbreviated New Drug Applications filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to market generic versions of VIMOVO. The lawsuits claim infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,557,285 (‘285 patent) and 6,926,907 (‘907 patent) titled “Pharmaceutical Compositions for the Coordinated Delivery of NSAIDs,” which cover VIMOVO. The District Court’s decision was made based on the validity of the ‘285 and ‘907 patents for VIMOVO and the Court’s judgment will prevent Dr. Reddy’s, Mylan, and Lupin from launching generic versions of VIMOVO in the United States until at least the expiration of the relevant patent.
“We are very pleased that the fair and appropriate ruling regarding this litigation was rendered by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey,” said Adrian Adams, Chief Executive Officer of Aralez. “This demonstrates the strength of our intellectual property portfolio for VIMOVO and Yosprala®. We remain committed to aggressively defending our intellectual property.”
Click here to read the full press release.
Source: www.newswire.ca
Latest News
Investing News Network websites or approved third-party tools use cookies. Please refer to the cookie policy for collected data, privacy and GDPR compliance. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies.