NICO Project development advancing with U.S. and Canadian Government financial support
- AustraliaNorth AmericaWorld
Investing News NetworkYour trusted source for investing success
Silver47 Exploration
Purpose Bitcoin ETF
Black Swan Graphene
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
- Lithium Outlook
- Oil and Gas Outlook
- Gold Outlook Report
- Uranium Outlook
- Rare Earths Outlook
- All Outlook Reports
- Top Generative AI Stocks
- Top EV Stocks
- Biggest AI Companies
- Biggest Blockchain Stocks
- Biggest Cryptocurrency-mining Stocks
- Biggest Cybersecurity Companies
- Biggest Robotics Companies
- Biggest Social Media Companies
- Biggest Technology ETFs
- Artificial Intellgience ETFs
- Robotics ETFs
- Canadian Cryptocurrency ETFs
- Artificial Intelligence Outlook
- EV Outlook
- Cleantech Outlook
- Crypto Outlook
- Tech Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
- Cannabis Weekly Round-Up
- Top Alzheimer's Treatment Stocks
- Top Biotech Stocks
- Top Plant-based Food Stocks
- Biggest Cannabis Stocks
- Biggest Pharma Stocks
- Longevity Stocks to Watch
- Psychedelics Stocks to Watch
- Top Cobalt Stocks
- Small Biotech ETFs to Watch
- Top Life Science ETFs
- Biggest Pharmaceutical ETFs
- Life Science Outlook
- Biotech Outlook
- Cannabis Outlook
- Pharma Outlook
- Psychedelics Outlook
- All Market Outlook Reports
Fortune Minerals Extends Option to Acquire the Alberta Refinery Site for the NICO Critical Minerals Project
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) (“Fortune” or the “Company”) (www.fortuneminerals.com) is pleased to announce that it has secured an additional extension to the option to purchase the JFSL Field Services ULC (“JFSL”) brownfield site in Lamont County, Alberta (see news releases, dated January 24, 2022, July 14, 2022, and October 3, 2022). Fortune plans to construct a hydrometallurgical refinery at this site for its vertically integrated NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper critical minerals project (“NICO Project”). The JFSL facility is a former steel fabrication plant located on 76.78 acres of lands in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland northeast of Edmonton and has 42,000 square feet of serviced shops and buildings adjacent to the Canadian National Railway. The JFSL site is also close to services, sources of reagents, and a commutable pool of engineers and skilled chemical plant workers to materially reduce capital and operating costs for the planned NICO Project development.
Pursuant to the option agreement, Fortune can acquire the JFSL site and facilities for C$5.5 million. The term of the option can be extended for up to six months by Fortune paying JFSL C$15,000 per month. JFSL’s has the right to solicit competing offers for the facility, subject to Fortune’s right to complete its purchase on the agreed terms by the end of the month for any extension period and/or Fortune’s right of first refusal to match the competing offer.
Like our news? Click-to-tweet.
The NICO refinery would process metal concentrates from the planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator in the Northwest Territories (“NWT”) enabling Fortune to become a vertically integrated producer of cobalt sulphate needed to make the cathodes of lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles, portable electronics and stationary storage cells. The refinery would also produce bismuth ingots and oxide, an ‘Eco-metal’ used in the automotive and pharmaceutical industries and with growing demand as an environmentally safe and non-toxic replacement for lead in free-machining steels and aluminum, brasses and solders used in potable drinking water sources and electronics, ceramic glazes, radiation shielding, glass, ammunition, and fishing weights, and environmentally safe plugs to decommission oil and gas wells. The Mineral Reserves for the NICO deposit also contain more than one million ounces of gold, and copper as a minor by-product. The vertically integrated NICO Project is an advanced development stage critical minerals development asset that has already received environmental assessment approval and the major mine permits for the facilities in the NWT. The project has also been assessed in positive Feasibility and Front-End Engineering and Design (“FEED”) studies that will be updated to reflect the new refinery site and recent project optimizations.
For more detailed information about the NICO Mineral Reserves and certain technical information in this news release, please refer to the Technical Report on the NICO Project, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon International Limited which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com. The disclosure of scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been approved by Robin Goad, M.Sc., P.Geo., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fortune, who is a "Qualified Person" under National Instrument 43-101.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper critical minerals project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune’s email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on Twitter.
This press release contains forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes statements with respect to, among other things, the exercise by the Company of its option to purchase of the JFSL site, the successful construction and completion of the proposed hydrometallurgical refinery at the JFSL site, and the Company’s plans to develop the NICO Project, including the successful the development and construction of the planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management as well as certain assumptions at the date the information is given (including, in respect of the forward-looking information contained in this press release, assumptions regarding: the successful completion of the Company’s due diligence investigations on the JFSL site, the Company’s ability to secure the necessary financing to fund the exercise of the option and complete the purchase of the JFSL site, the Company’s ability to complete construction of a NICO Project refinery; the Company’s ability to arrange the necessary financing to continue operations and develop the NICO Project; the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals for the construction and operation of the NICO Project, including the planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator and the timing thereof; growth in the demand for cobalt; the time required to construct the NICO Project; and the economic environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of gold, cobalt and other by-product metals, anticipated costs and the volumes of metals to be produced at the NICO Project). However, such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the risks that the COVID-19 pandemic or global geopolitical situations may interfere with the Company’s ability to continue development of the NICO Project, the Company may not be able to complete the purchase of the JFSL site and secure a site for the construction of a refinery, the Company may not be able to finance and develop NICO on favourable terms or at all, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits, approvals and agreements for the development of the NICO Project, including the related hydrometallurgical refinery, the construction of the NICO Project may take longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to secure offtake agreements for the metals to be produced at the NICO Project, the Sue-Dianne Property may not be developed to the point where it can provide mill feed to the NICO Project, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and in the mining industry in general, the market for products that use cobalt or bismuth may not grow to the extent anticipated, the future supply of cobalt and bismuth may not be as limited as anticipated, the risk of decreases in the market prices of cobalt, bismuth and other metals to be produced by the NICO Project, discrepancies between actual and estimated Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries, uncertainties associated with estimating Mineral Resources and Reserves and the risk that even if such Mineral Resources prove accurate the risk that such Mineral Resources may not be converted into Mineral Reserves once economic conditions are applied, the Company’s production of cobalt, bismuth and other metals may be less than anticipated and other operational and development risks, market risks and regulatory risks. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
Contacts
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
Fortune Minerals Investor Kit
- Corporate info
- Insights
- Growth strategies
- Upcoming projects
GET YOUR FREE INVESTOR KIT
Fortune Minerals
Investor Insights
The NICO project’s receipt of substantial government funding to date and Fortune Minerals’ strong relations with the Indigenous and local communities in the Northwest Territories create a compelling case for investors considering a battery metals play with significant polymetallic potential.
Overview
Cobalt is an often-overlooked critical mineral in the transition to clean energy, required to make the cathodes of many lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles (EVs), stationary storage cells and consumer electronics. Cobalt is also used in superalloys for the aerospace industry, cemented carbides, cutting tools, permanent magnets, surgical implants, catalysts, pigments and agricultural products.
The global cobalt market is expected to reach a volume of almost 306,000 metric tons by 2028. Cobalt outlook in the long-term is expected to double by 2030 with the EV segment accounting for 89 percent of growth, energy storage at 3 percent and superalloys at 2 percent.
Fortune Minerals (TSX:FT,OTCQB:FTMDF) is a Canadian mining company developing its wholly owned, vertically integrated NICO primary cobalt project in Canada to produce cobalt chemicals for the rapidly expanding lithium-ion battery industry. The NICO mineral reserves also contain 1.1 million ounces (Moz) of gold, 12 percent of global bismuth reserves, and copper as a minor by-product. NICO comprises a proposed mine and mill in the Northwest Territories that will produce bulk concentrates that will be shipped to a planned refinery in Southern Canada. The concentrates from the mine will then be processed into energy and eco-metals for the growing clean energy economy.
NICO is a primary cobalt deposit, but the mineral reserves also contain 1.1 Moz of gold as a countercyclical and highly liquid co-product that can be easily converted to cash. The gold contained in the NICO deposit stands out among other cobalt projects, where the metal is produced primarily as a by-product of copper or nickel.
NICO is also the largest known deposit of bismuth in the world with about 12 percent of global reserves – even though it represents only about 10 percent of the company’s projected revenue from operations at recent metal prices.
The cobalt, bismuth and copper contained in the NICO deposit are all classified as critical minerals by Canada, as they have essential use in new technologies, cannot be easily substituted with other minerals, and because supply chains may be threatened by geopolitical issues.
The mineral reserves for the NICO deposit were estimated in compliance with NI-43-101 and total 33.1 million tonnes (Mt), containing 82.3 million lbs (37,341 tonnes) of cobalt, 1.1 Moz of gold, 102.1 million lbs (46,325 tonnes) of bismuth and 27.2 million lbs (12,296 tonnes) of copper to support a 20-year mine life at a mill throughput rate of 4,650 metric tons of ore per day.
Sums of the combined reserves may not exactly equal sums of the underground and open pit reserves due to rounding errors.
The mineral reserves are based on 327 drill holes plus surface trenches and underground test mining verifying the deposit grades, geometry and mining conditions. Both of Fortune Minerals’ deposits are open for potential expansion, extending the deposits with additional drilling or identifying new zones or deposits.
The Government of Canada is providing funding of up to $714,500 for the planned cobalt sulphate process pilot and other metallurgical test work at the NICO project. Additionally, the Government of Alberta, through the Alberta Innovates, has also approved additional funding contributions of up to $172,670 toward the budgeted program costs under its Clean Resources Continuous Intake Program. The funds will be used to support a mini-pilot at SGS Canada to confirm certain process design criteria and improvements to the NICO project metallurgical processes.
Fortune Minerals also received an C$8.74 million grant from the United States Department of Defense to expand the domestic capacity and production of cobalt for the battery and high strength alloy supply chains. The company recently secured a total of C$17 million financial support from the Canadian and US governments to advance the NICO project.
The company’s other assets include the Sue-Dianne deposit, which has near-surface, copper-silver-gold deposits that can feed into the NICO mill.
Company Highlights
- Fortune Minerals is building a reliable, vertically integrated North American critical minerals project to produce cobalt chemicals for the rapidly expanding lithium-ion battery industry.
- The NICO project is one of a few advanced-stage cobalt projects outside the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with an average annual production of approximately 1,800 tons of cobalt units in the first 14 years of the 20-year mine life.
- The company's flagship asset’s primary cobalt production is independent of nickel and copper mining and contains more than 1 million ounces (Moz) of in-situ co-product gold.
- Fortune Minerals has received environmental assessment approval for the mine, concentrator and access road in the Northwest Territories.
- The company has developed strong relationships with Indigenous and local communities and governments, which paved the way for federal, Northwest Territories and Tlicho Governments' approval of the project and financial support for local infrastructure, including the $400 million Tlicho all-season highway project to Whati that recently opened to the public, and more than $800,000 in federal and provincial funding for exploration work at NICO.
- Collaboration with Rio Tinto to assess options to improve recovery of bismuth and cobalt contained in Rio Tinto’s Kennecott smelter waste streams.
- Fortune Minerals recently secured a total of C$17 million in funding from the Canadian and US governments to advance the NICO project.
- An experienced management team leads Fortune Minerals towards fully developing and capitalizing on its assets.
Key Project
NICO Cobalt Project and Reserves
The NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper deposit is an IOCG or Olympic Dam-type mineral deposit situated on 5,140 hectares of mining leases, located 160 kilometers northwest of the City of Yellowknife and 50 kilometers north of Whati in Canada's Northwest Territories.
Fortune Minerals has spent more than C$135 million preparing technical, environmental and social studies to support the development of the NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper project. Environmental assessment approval and the major mine permits have been received for the planned facilities in the Northwest Territories. The project is expected to be a reliable North American producer of critical minerals with supply chain transparency and custody control of ethically produced metals from ores through to the production of value-added metals and chemicals.
Project Highlights:
- Excellent Infrastructure in Place and Under Development: There is all-season road access to Whati via Highway 9, a $400-million design/build/operate/maintain private-public partnership between the Government of the Northwest Territories and North Star Infrastructure. The federal government contributed up to $53 million of the project's capital costs through the Canadian Infrastructure Fund. Fortune Minerals has received environmental assessment approval to build a 50-kilometer spur road from Whati to the mine site, which is included in the mine site capital costs. With the construction of the road, Fortune will be able to transport metal concentrates from the mine to the railway at Enterprise or Hay River and deliver them by rail to the company's planned refinery in Alberta. The NICO leases are located 25 kilometers west of the Snare hydro complex and electrical grid servicing Yellowknife.
- Large, Well-defined Polymetallic Deposit: NICO and the company's satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit are classified as iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG)-type deposits with world-class global analogs, including Olympic Dam in South Australia, the Salobo and Sossego deposits in Brazil, and the Candelaria district deposits in Chile. They occur in clusters of multiple deposits, commonly aggregating more than a billion tonnes in similar tectonic and geological environments.
- Encouraging Results from 2021 Exploratory Drilling: The company’s exploratory drilling program consisted of 13 drill holes totaling 2,482 meters. Promising results from the campaign include:
- 3.17 meters, averaging 0.42 percent cobalt, 0.55 g/t gold, and 0.37 percent bismuth at a depth of 28.7 meters, including 1.05 meters, grading 0.99 percent cobalt, 0.25 g/t gold, and 0.56 percent bismuth;
- 4.8 meters, averaging 0.12 percent cobalt and 0.50 g/t gold at a depth of 8 meters, including 1.98 meters, averaging 0.26 percent cobalt and 1.13 g/t gold;
- 2.31 meters, averaging 0.11 percent cobalt and 0.87 g/t gold at a depth of 139.6 meters, including 1.16 meters, grading 0.20 percent cobalt and 1.63 g/t gold.
- 2014 Micon NICO Feasibility Study: A positive feasibility study was completed in 2014 by Micon International Limited that identified the mineral reserves to support a 20-year mine life at a mill throughput rate of 4,650 metric tons of ore per day. The feasibility study and previous front-end engineering and design study by Aker Solutions contemplated combined open-pit and underground mining during the first two years of the mine life, followed by open-pit-only mining. The company will be updating this study to include project optimizations, current capital and operating costs, and current commodity prices.
Sue-Dianne Copper Deposit
The Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located near the NICO deposit belongs to IOCG class of deposits with world-class global analogues and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.Management Team
Mahendra Naik - Chairman and Director
Mahendra Naik is a chartered accountant and was one of the founding directors and key executives who started IAMGOLD Corporation, a TSX and NYSE-listed gold mining company. As chief financial officer from 1990 to 1999, he was involved in the negotiations of the Sadiola and Yatela mine joint ventures with Anglo American, and the US$400 million project debt financing for the development of the mines. In addition, he was involved in more than $150 million in equity financings including the IPO for IAMGOLD. Naik is currently the chief executive officer of FinSec Services., a private business advisory company and a director and member of the audit and compensation committees for IAMGOLD. In addition, Naik is a director and member of audit, compensation and risk/control committees of FirstGlobalData Limited, Goldmoney Network Limited and Jameson Bank.
Robin E. Goad - President, CEO and Director
Robin Goad is a professional geologist with 30 years of experience in the mining and exploration industries. Before founding Fortune in 1988, Goad worked for large companies, including Noranda and Teck, as a consultant in the resource industry. Goad is a director of the NWT and Nunavut Chamber of Mines and has served as president and director of other TSX-listed mineral exploration and development companies.
Patricia Penney - Interim CFO
Patricia Penney is a chartered accountant with 20 years of accounting and audit experience. Before Fortune, she was a senior manager with Caceis Canada., an alternative fund administrator.
Richard Schryer - Vice-president of Regulatory and Environmental Affairs
Richard Schryer is an aquatic scientist with more than 25 years of experience in mine permitting, environmental assessments, environmental studies and monitoring. Schryer also worked with Golder Associates.
Alex Mezei - Chief Metallurgist
Alex Mezei is an independent metallurgical consultant with 40 years of international process engineering experience, providing general and specialized services in metallurgical process flowsheet testing, design, development, derisking and implementation. Mezei has been involved in process economics assessment for several projects. Specific technical expertise includes hydrometallurgy, liquid-solid separation, rheology, and mineral processing. Projects and commodities include extraction of cobalt, lithium, nickel, graphite, manganese, as well as base, rare and precious metals. In addition, Mezei provides specialized expertise in recycling, oil sands and carbon capture projects. Mezei is a Qualified Person for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101.
David Knight - Corporate Secretary
David Knight is a partner with WeirFoulds LLP. David is widely recognized for his more than 30 years of experience. He specializes in securities law, including public and private financings, mergers and acquisitions, stock exchange listings and regulatory compliance and acts for investment dealers and issuers. Knight is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada.
Troy Nazarewicz - Investor Relations Manager
Troy D. Nazarewicz has 30 years of experience in the capital markets as a portfolio manager with MacDougall, MacDougall & MacTier and in his investor relations role at Fortune. He also worked as a business development manager with a design and marketing firm.
Fortune Minerals Retains Worley to Update the NICO Project Feasibility Study and Alberta Site Permitting
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) (" Fortune " or the " Company ") ( www.fortuneminerals.com ) is pleased to announce that it has retained Worley Canada Services Ltd. (" Worley ") to conduct additional engineering and lead the preparation of an updated Feasibility Study for the NICO Cobalt-Gold-Bismuth-Copper Project in Canada (" NICO Project "). The NICO Project is an advanced Critical Minerals development comprised of a planned mine and concentrator in the Northwest Territories (" NWT ") and a hydrometallurgical recovery plant in Lamont County, Alberta (" Hydrometallurgical Facility ") where concentrates from the mine, and other feed sources, will be processed to value-added products for the energy transition and new technologies. Worley has also been retained to assist with permitting for the Hydrometallurgical Facility, which is planned to be constructed at a brownfield site held under a purchase option arrangement from JFSL Field Services LLC (" JFSL ") (see news release dated, August 19, 2024). Development of the vertically integrated NICO Project would provide a reliable North American supply of cobalt sulphate, gold doré, bismuth ingots, and copper cement produced with supply chain transparency, Canadian Environmental-Social-Governance (" ESG" ) standards, and compliance with the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (" IRA ").
Fortune was recently awarded ~C$17 million of non-dilutive grants and contribution funding from the U.S. Department of Defense (" DoD "), Natural Resources Canada (" NRCan ") and Alberta Innovates to help finance the work needed to advance the NICO Project to a project finance and construction decision (see news releases dated, May 16, 2024, and December 5, 2023). The funds are supporting metallurgical test work at SGS Canada Inc. (" SGS ") to validate recent process optimizations and flow sheet modifications, update the Feasibility and Front-End Engineering and Design studies for the planned development, permit the Hydrometallurgical Facility, and secure the remaining authorizations, management plans, and satisfy the environmental assessment measures and water license conditions required to construct and operate the NICO mine and concentrator.
Like our news? Click-to-post on X .
The NICO Project was assessed in a positive Feasibility Study in 2014 by Micon International Limited (" Micon ") but is now out of date. Micon, and P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (" P&E ") who also contributed to the 2014 study, will assist Worley with preparation of the NI 43-101 Technical Report, and the updated Mineral Reserve estimates and Mine Plan for the new Feasibility Study, respectively. Worley's discipline experts have reviewed historical technical data for the NICO Project and have visited the NWT and Alberta sites. The updated Feasibility Study will assess the NICO Project economics at current costs, commodity prices, and currency exchange rates, while also incorporating recent improvements and project optimizations that include:
- Completion of the Tlicho Highway in the NWT, eliminating capital cost redundancies and reducing the construction schedule for the mine and concentrator;
- Incorporation of the new brownfield Alberta site for the Hydrometallurgical Facility and re-purposing of the 42,000 square feet of serviced buildings on 77 acres of lands adjacent to the Canadian National Railway;
- Proximity of the Hydrometallurgical Facility site to services and reagents available in Alberta's Industrial Heartland, such as process and potable water, natural gas, low-cost power, sulphuric acid, oxygen, lime, and a commutable pool of skilled engineers and chemical plant workers;
- Enhanced transportation logistics and reduced concentrate haulage distances between the NWT and Alberta sites;
- A new waste residue disposal strategy for the Hydrometallurgical Facility, including potential sequential precipitation of a saleable gypsum by-product to reduce process residue transportation and disposal costs;
- Incorporation of recent process optimizations to reduce capital and operating costs and assessing the potential for improved metallurgical recoveries from the test work programs in progress at SGS;
- A new Resource Model with more constrained wireframe boundaries to reduce internal and external modelling dilution and providing better differentiation of higher-grade Mineral Resource blocks for earlier processing;
- A new Mine Plan focused on earlier mining and processing of higher margin ores to accelerate cash flows, together with a stockpiling strategy to defer processing lower margin ores;
- Sensitivity analyses for processing other feed sources in the Hydrometallurgical Facility, including intermediate products from the Kennecott Smelter waste streams pursuant to the process collaboration between Fortune and Rio Tinto.
About the NICO Project
The NICO Project is a vertically integrated Critical Minerals asset that Fortune has expended more than C$138 million to advance from an in-house mineral discovery to a near shovel-ready development. The economics for the project were previously assessed in a positive Feasibility Study, and the Company has secured environmental assessment approval and the major mine permits for the facilities in the NWT.
The NICO Deposit is situated in Tlicho Territory, approximately 160 km northwest of the City of Yellowknife and 50 km north of the community of Whati where the new Tlicho Highway currently terminates. The deposit contains open pit and underground Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves totaling 33.1 million tonnes containing 1.11 million ounces of gold, 82.3 million pounds of cobalt, 102.1 million pounds of bismuth, and 27.2 million pounds of copper that are sufficient to support an approximate 20-year mine life. NICO and the Company's nearby Sue-Dianne copper deposit are IOCG-type mineral deposits with world class global analogues, including the ‘super giant' Olympic Dam Deposit in South Australia. IOCG-type deposits are typically very large copper-gold deposits but are notably also enriched in important technology metals.
The NICO Deposit is planned to be mined primarily by conventional truck and shovel open pit methods with a low waste to ore strip ratio. A portion of the higher-grade Mineral Reserves are planned to be mined by underground open stoping methods to accelerate cash flows during early years of the mine life using the existing ramp and underground workings from previous test mining for access and ore haulage.
Ores from the mine will be processed by crushing, grinding and bulk flotation methods with a low (~4%) mass pull that reduces 4,650 tonnes of daily mill throughput to approximately 180 tonnes of bulk concentrate containing the recoverable metals. The bulk concentrate will be subjected to re-grinding and secondary flotation to produce gold-bearing cobalt and bismuth concentrates for low-cost transportation by truck and rail to Alberta and downstream processing to value-added products.
The Hydrometallurgical Facility is planned to be constructed in Lamont County in Alberta's Industrial Heartland, approximately 30 km north of Edmonton, where the municipal planning approvals are already in place for heavy industry. The cobalt concentrate will be processed in an autoclave using pressure-oxidation to dissolve the metals, followed by sequential neutralization, copper cementation, and solvent extraction purification and crystallization of cobalt sulphate heptahydrate. The bismuth concentrate will be processed by ferric chloride leaching, followed by cementation, and smelting to pour pure ingots. Gold will be recovered by leaching the autoclave residue, followed by carbon elution and smelting to doré bars. Test work is underway at SGS to determine if a saleable gypsum by-product can also be produced during sequential neutralization of the autoclave effluent to increase revenues and reduce the amount of waste that would need to be trucked to an offsite disposal facility.
NICO Commodities
NICO is a polymetallic deposit containing three Critical Minerals (cobalt, bismuth and copper) and more than one million ounces of in-situ gold as a highly liquid and countercyclical co-product to mitigate Critical Mineral price volatility.
Cobalt is a particularly important Critical Mineral due to its expanding consumption in the cathodes of lithium-ion rechargeable batteries used in electric vehicles, portable electronics and stationary storage cells. Cobalt is also used in aerospace superalloys, cutting tools, magnets, catalysts and pigments. There are concerns with the current sources of supply for cobalt because of the geographic concentration of mine production in the politically unstable and ESG-challenged Democratic Republic of the Congo (77% of mine supply) and geopolitical risks associated with China's ownership of most of these mines, 80% of the world's refinery production, and 90% of cobalt chemical supply.
Bismuth is another Critical Mineral with a supply chain controlled by China (~80% of the world production). Bismuth has unique physical and chemical properties leveraged to make automotive glass and steel coatings, paints and pigments, and brake pads. It is also used in low melting temperature and dimensionally stable alloys, fire depressants, and pharmaceuticals. Bismuth consumption is increasing as an environmentally safe and non-toxic replacement for lead in brass, solders, free machining steel and aluminum, galvanizing alloys, glass, ceramic glazes, radiation shielding, ammunition, and fishing weights. Bismuth-tin alloy is used to make environmentally safe plugs to properly seal decommissioned oil and gas wells to prevent greenhouse gas leakage, blowouts and groundwater contamination. Manganese-bismuth magnets are also being commercialized as a potential replacement for Rare Earth Elements in the magnets used in electric vehicle powertrain motors.
Fortune will be pleased to provide periodic updates on the progress of its various metallurgical, engineering and permitting programs.
For more detailed information about the NICO Mineral Reserves and certain technical information in this news release, please refer to the Technical Report on the NICO Project, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon International Limited which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com .
The disclosure of scientific and technical information contained in this news release have been approved by Robin Goad, M.Sc., P.Geo., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fortune and Alex Mezei, M.Sc., P.Eng. Fortune's Chief Metallurgist, who are "Qualified Persons" under National Instrument 43-101.
About Worley Group
Worley is an international engineering, construction management and environmental services company listed for trading on the Australian Stock Exchange.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO Cobalt-Gold-Bismuth-Copper Project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne Copper-Silver-Gold Deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune's email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on X.
This press release contains forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes statements with respect to, among other things, the exercise of the option by the Company and the purchase of the JFSL site, the construction of the proposed Hydrometallurgical Facility at the JFSL site, the potential for expansion of the NICO Deposit and the Company's plans to develop the NICO Project. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management as well as certain assumptions at the date the information is given (including, in respect of the forward-looking information contained in this press release, assumptions regarding: the successful completion of the Company's due diligence investigations on the JFSL site, the Company's ability to secure the necessary financing to fund the exercise of the option and complete the purchase of the JFSL site, the Company's ability to complete construction of a NICO Project Hydrometallurgical Facility; the Company's ability to arrange the necessary financing to continue operations and develop the NICO Project; the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals for the construction and operation of the NICO Project and the related Hydrometallurgical Facility and the timing thereof; growth in the demand for cobalt; the time required to construct the NICO Project; and the economic environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of gold, cobalt and other by-product metals, anticipated costs and the volumes of metals to be produced at the NICO Project). However, such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the risks that the 2021 drill program may not result in a meaningful expansion of the NICO Deposit, the Company may not be able to complete the purchase of the JFSL site and secure a site for the construction of a Hydrometallurgical Facility, the Company may not be able to finance and develop NICO on favourable terms or at all, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits, approvals and agreements for the development of the NICO Project, including the related Hydrometallurgical Facility, the construction of the NICO Project may take longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to secure offtake agreements for the metals to be produced at the NICO Project, the Sue-Dianne Property may not be developed to the point where it can provide mill feed to the NICO Project, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and in the mining industry in general, the market for products that use cobalt or bismuth may not grow to the extent anticipated, the future supply of cobalt and bismuth may not be as limited as anticipated, the risk of decreases in the market prices of cobalt, bismuth and other metals to be produced by the NICO Project, discrepancies between actual and estimated Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries, uncertainties associated with estimating Mineral Resources and Reserves and the risk that even if such Mineral Resources prove accurate the risk that such Mineral Resources may not be converted into Mineral Reserves once economic conditions are applied, the Company's production of cobalt, bismuth and other metals may be less than anticipated and other operational and development risks, market risks and regulatory risks. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241007214068/en/
For further information please contact:
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Fortune Minerals Completes New Option Agreement to Acquire the JFSL Alberta Refinery Site for the NICO Project
Alex Mezei retained as Chief Metallurgist to supervise test work and process engineering
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) (" Fortune " or the " Company ") ( www.fortuneminerals.com ) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a new option agreement with JFSL Field Services ULC (" JFSL ") to purchase the brownfield industrial site in Lamont County, Alberta where it plans to construct its hydrometallurgical refinery (" Alberta Refinery "). The Alberta Refinery would process metal concentrates from Fortune's planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator in the Northwest Territories (" NWT ") (collectively, the " NICO Project ") and provide a reliable domestic supply of Critical Minerals for the energy transition and other new technologies. The Alberta Refinery will produce cobalt sulphate for the North American lithium-ion battery industry, bismuth ingots (12% of global reserves) and copper cement - with more than one million ounces of in-situ gold as a countercyclical and highly liquid co-product. Fortune also has a process collaboration with Rio Tinto examining the feasibility of processing materials produced from Kennecott Smelter wastes in Utah at the Alberta Refinery to increase cobalt and bismuth production.
Like our news? Click-to-tweet .
Pursuant to the new option agreement, Fortune can acquire the Lamont County site from JFSL for C$6,000,000 prior to the end of November 2025, provided it makes monthly option payments of C$100,000. The monthly option payments and the C$1,437,500 previously paid by Fortune to JFSL, are deductible from the purchase price. JFSL will be entitled to list the Lamont County property for sale during the option period, subject to Fortune's 90-day right of first refusal to match any third-party offer. JFSL will also be entitled to continue using the Lamont County property and facilities for the eighteen months following a sale to Fortune.
JFSL is a subsidiary of Worley Group (" Worley "), an international engineering, construction management and environmental services company listed for trading on the Australian Stock Exchange. Worley will be the preferred contractor for environmental, engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction work for the Alberta Refinery.
The JFSL site is comprised of 76.78 acres of lands adjacent to the Canadian National Railway in Alberta's Industrial Heartland, an association of five municipalities northeast of Edmonton with planning approvals and tax incentives designed to attract heavy industry. The JFSL site is a former steel fabrication plant with more than 42,000 square feet of serviced shops and buildings situated near the services, sources of reagents, and commutable skilled worker pool already in place for the Alberta petrochemicals industry. These are expected to materially reduce capital and operating costs for the Alberta Refinery during construction and operations.
Fortune is also pleased to announce that Alex Mezei, M.Sc. P.Eng., has joined the Company as Chief Metallurgist. Mr Mezei will supervise the test work and process and design engineering for the NICO Project, which the Company is advancing with the recently announced government contribution funding totalling approximately C$17 million (see news releases dated May 16, 2024 and December 5, 2023). Mr. Mezei is a Chemical Engineer with a more than forty years of diverse experience in international process engineering, test and pilot work, and economic assessments for a broad range of commodities around the world. This includes 22 years at SGS Mineral Services (" SGS ") in Lakefield, Ontario where he was Director, Engineering Technology Services, Metallurgical Operations, and Senior Metallurgist and notably, where he supervised the hydrometallurgical work for the NICO Project. Prior to SGS, Alex worked for Asea Brown Boveri as an instrumentation engineer, as a process research scientist at the Institute for Technological Engineering for Inorganic Chemistry and Nonferrous Metals in Romania, and as a production engineer at the Phoenix Metallurgical-Chemical Plant in Baia-Mare, Romania. Since retiring from SGS in 2016, Alex has worked as an Independent Consulting Metallurgist and Director of Metallurgy for Planetary Technologies.
For more detailed information about the NICO Mineral Reserves and certain technical information in this news release, please refer to the Technical Report on the NICO Project, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon International Limited which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com .
The disclosure of scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been approved by Robin Goad, M.Sc., P.Geo., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fortune, who is a "Qualified Person" under National Instrument 43-101.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO Cobalt-Gold-Bismuth-Copper Project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne Copper-Silver-Gold Deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune's email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on Twitter.
This press release contains forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes statements with respect to, among other things, the exercise of the option by the Company and the purchase of the JFSL site, the construction of the proposed hydrometallurgical refinery at the JFSL site, the potential for expansion of the NICO Deposit and the Company's plans to develop the NICO Project. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management as well as certain assumptions at the date the information is given (including, in respect of the forward-looking information contained in this press release, assumptions regarding: the successful completion of the Company's due diligence investigations on the JFSL site, the Company's ability to secure the necessary financing to fund the exercise of the option and complete the purchase of the JFSL site, the Company's ability to complete construction of a NICO Project refinery; the Company's ability to arrange the necessary financing to continue operations and develop the NICO Project; the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals for the construction and operation of the NICO Project and the related hydrometallurgical refinery and the timing thereof; growth in the demand for cobalt; the time required to construct the NICO Project; and the economic environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of gold, cobalt and other by-product metals, anticipated costs and the volumes of metals to be produced at the NICO Project). However, such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the risks that the 2021 drill program may not result in a meaningful expansion of the NICO Deposit, the Company may not be able to complete the purchase of the JFSL site and secure a site for the construction of a refinery, the Company may not be able to finance and develop NICO on favourable terms or at all, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits, approvals and agreements for the development of the NICO Project, including the related hydrometallurgical refinery, the construction of the NICO Project may take longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to secure offtake agreements for the metals to be produced at the NICO Project, the Sue-Dianne Property may not be developed to the point where it can provide mill feed to the NICO Project, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and in the mining industry in general, the market for products that use cobalt or bismuth may not grow to the extent anticipated, the future supply of cobalt and bismuth may not be as limited as anticipated, the risk of decreases in the market prices of cobalt, bismuth and other metals to be produced by the NICO Project, discrepancies between actual and estimated Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries, uncertainties associated with estimating Mineral Resources and Reserves and the risk that even if such Mineral Resources prove accurate the risk that such Mineral Resources may not be converted into Mineral Reserves once economic conditions are applied, the Company's production of cobalt, bismuth and other metals may be less than anticipated and other operational and development risks, market risks and regulatory risks. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240819194865/en/
For further information please contact:
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Alberta Refinery Site Option for NICO Project Has Expired
Fortune and JFSL remain interested in concluding a transaction under a new arrangement
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) (" Fortune " or the " Company ") ( www.fortuneminerals.com ) announces that the option to purchase the JFSL Field Services ULC (" JFSL ") brownfield industrial site in Lamont County, Alberta could not be completed before the expiry of the option on June 30, 2024. Both, Fortune and JFSL remain willing and able to complete a different transaction that would enable the Company to complete the purchase under a new arrangement as soon as possible. Fortune will provide an update on this plan when its discussions with JFSL have been concluded.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper critical minerals project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune's email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on Twitter.
This press release contains forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes statements with respect to, among other things, the Company and JFSL's discussions and future plans including any further arrangements. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management as well as certain assumptions at the date the information is given (including, in respect of the forward-looking information contained in this press release, assumptions regarding: the successful negotiations and agreement between the Company and JFSL and the economic environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of gold, cobalt and other by-product metals, anticipated costs and the volumes of metals to be produced at the NICO Project). However, such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the risks that global geopolitical situations may interfere with the Company's ability to successfully negotiate with JFSL, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and in the mining industry in general, the market for products that use cobalt or bismuth may not grow to the extent anticipated, the future supply of cobalt and bismuth may not be as limited as anticipated, the risk of decreases in the market prices of cobalt, bismuth and other metals to be produced by the NICO Project, discrepancies between actual and estimated Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries, uncertainties associated with estimating Mineral Resources and Reserves and the risk that even if such Mineral Resources prove accurate the risk that such Mineral Resources may not be converted into Mineral Reserves once economic conditions are applied, the Company's production of cobalt, bismuth and other metals may be less than anticipated and other operational and development risks, market risks and regulatory risks. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240701842400/en/
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Fortune Minerals Announces Results of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) ("Fortune" or the "Company") ( www.fortuneminerals.com ) reports that the nominees listed in the management information circular for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 25, 2024 (the "Meeting") were elected as directors of Fortune. Detailed results of the vote based on proxies received are set out below:
Nominee |
Votes For
% For
Votes Withheld
% Withheld
Robin E. Goad
131,382,847
99.39%
806,875
0.61%
Glen Koropchuk
128,779,281
97.42%
3,410,441
2.58%
John McVey
131,412,995
99.41%
776,727
0.59%
Mahendra Naik
130,713,090
98.88%
1,476,632
1.12%
David Ramsay
129,852,490
98.23%
2,337,232
1.77%
Edward Yurkowski
131,309,561
99.33%
880,161
0.67%
Shareholders also approved the appointment of McGovern Hurley LLP as the auditor of Fortune.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper critical minerals project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune's email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on Twitter.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240626891223/en/
For further information please contact:
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Fortune Minerals Enters Into Convertible Securities Funding Agreement for up to C$10 Million With Lind Partners
Initial C$1.25 million drawdown used to pay a C$1 million downpayment for the Alberta refinery site
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSX: FT) (OTCQB: FTMDF) (" Fortune " or the " Company ") ( www.fortuneminerals.com ) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a convertible securities agreement with Lind Global Fund II, LP, managed by The Lind Partners (together, " Lind ") for up to C$10,000,000. Fortune has received an initial C$1.25 million in exchange for the issuance of a first convertible security, and subject to the agreement of both parties, additional drawdowns can be made. Most of the proceeds from the first drawdown were used to make a C$1 million downpayment to JFSL Field Services ULC (" JFSL ") to extend the purchase option for the brownfield industrial site and buildings in Lamont County, Alberta on amended terms. Fortune plans to construct a hydrometallurgical refinery on this site (" Alberta Refinery ") to treat metal concentrates from the proposed NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator in the Northwest Territories (" NWT ") (collectively, the " NICO Project ") and other feed sources.
The first convertible security has a two-year term with a face value of C$1,600,000 secured by a lien against the Company's assets. Lind will be entitled to incrementally convert the face value amount of the first convertible security over a 24-month period, subject to certain limits, at a conversion price equal to 80% of the five-day trailing volume weighted average price of Fortune's shares (" VWAP ") prior to the date of conversion. Commencing 180 days after the shares issuable under the first convertible security become free trading, Fortune has the right to repurchase the first convertible security, subject to Lind's option to convert up to one third of the face value into Fortune common shares prior to such repurchase at a conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day VWAP. Lind will also receive a closing fee of $50,000 and 12,500,000 common share purchase warrants at an exercise price of $0.065 per common share for 60 months from the date of issuance after closing.
Fortune is also pleased to report that it has entered into an amended option agreement with JFSL to acquire its 77-acre site and 42,000 square feet of serviced shops and buildings located in Lamont County Alberta where the Company plans to construct and operate the Alberta Refinery. Fortune has completed option payments to JFSL, totalling C$1.4375 million to be applied against the C$5.5 million purchase price and can complete the acquisition by paying JFSL the balance of the purchase price by June 28, 2024. JFSL will also have the right to use the facilities for a period of 18 months following Fortune's purchase of the facilities. In addition, JFSL‘s parent, "Worley Group" will have preferential rights to conduct certain engineering work for Fortune.
The Toronto Stock Exchange (the " TSX ") has provided conditional approval in respect of the Funding Agreement.
This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of any of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. The securities will not be and have not been registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or applicable exemption from the registration requirements.
About The Lind Partners:
The Lind Partners manages institutional funds that are leaders in providing growth capital to small- and mid-cap companies publicly traded in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK. Lind's multi-strategy funds make direct investments ranging from US$1 to US$30 million, invest in syndicated equity placements and selectively buy on market. Having completed more than 200 direct investments totaling over US$2 billion in transaction value, Lind's funds have been flexible and supportive capital partners to investee companies since 2011.
About Fortune Minerals:
Fortune is a Canadian mining company focused on developing the NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper critical minerals project in the NWT and Alberta. Fortune also owns the satellite Sue-Dianne copper-silver-gold deposit located 25 km north of the NICO Deposit and is a potential future source of incremental mill feed to extend the life of the NICO mill and concentrator.
Follow Fortune Minerals:
Click here to subscribe to Fortune's email list.
Click here to follow Fortune on LinkedIn.
@FortuneMineral on Twitter.
This press release contains forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes statements with respect to, among other things, additional drawdowns under the Funding Agreement, use of the first drawdown under the Funding Agreement, the exercise by the Company of its option to purchase of the JFSL site, the successful construction and completion of the proposed hydrometallurgical refinery at the JFSL site, and the Company's plans to develop the NICO Project, including the successful the development and construction of the planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management as well as certain assumptions at the date the information is given (including, in respect of the forward-looking information contained in this press release, assumptions regarding: final approval by the TSX in respect of the Funding Agreement and related matters; extension of the option in respect of the JFSL site; the Company's ability to secure the necessary financing to fund the exercise of the option and complete the purchase of the JFSL site; the Company's ability to complete construction of a NICO Project refinery; the Company's ability to arrange the necessary financing to continue operations and develop the NICO Project; the receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals for the construction and operation of the NICO Project, including the planned NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper mine and concentrator and the timing thereof; growth in the demand for cobalt; the time required to construct the NICO Project; and the economic environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of gold, cobalt and other by-product metals, anticipated costs and the volumes of metals to be produced at the NICO Project). However, such forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the risks that the TSX may not provide final approval in respect of the Funding Agreement and related matters, that global geopolitical situations may interfere with the Company's ability to continue development of the NICO Project, the Company may not be able to complete the purchase of the JFSL site and secure a site for the construction of a refinery, the Company may not be able to finance and develop NICO on favourable terms or at all, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits, approvals and agreements for the development of the NICO Project, including the related hydrometallurgical refinery, the construction of the NICO Project may take longer than anticipated, the Company may not be able to secure offtake agreements for the metals to be produced at the NICO Project, the Sue-Dianne Property may not be developed to the point where it can provide mill feed to the NICO Project, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties and in the mining industry in general, the market for products that use cobalt or bismuth may not grow to the extent anticipated, the future supply of cobalt and bismuth may not be as limited as anticipated, the risk of decreases in the market prices of cobalt, bismuth and other metals to be produced by the NICO Project, discrepancies between actual and estimated Mineral Resources or between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries, uncertainties associated with estimating Mineral Resources and Reserves and the risk that even if such Mineral Resources prove accurate the risk that such Mineral Resources may not be converted into Mineral Reserves once economic conditions are applied, the Company's production of cobalt, bismuth and other metals may be less than anticipated and other operational and development risks, market risks and regulatory risks. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections, and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240522310279/en/
For further information please contact:
Fortune Minerals Limited
Troy Nazarewicz
Investor Relations Manager
info@fortuneminerals.com
Tel: (519) 858-8188
www.fortuneminerals.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Glencore's Lomas Bayas Partners with Ceibo to Accelerate Access to Clean Copper
Following a two-year study, Glencore to scale the use of Ceibo's sulfide leaching technology that significantly improves copper recovery
Ceibo , a clean copper extraction technology company, and Glencore ‘s (GB:GLEN) Lomas Bayas Mining Company have entered into a partnership to deploy Ceibo's proprietary leaching technologies that enable a more effective extraction of copper from low-grade sulfides at one of Chile's leading mines. Lomas Bayas has validated Ceibo's technology and is moving toward scaling up to assess this as an alternative to extend the life of their mining operations. This partnership follows two years of testing by Glencore, an important contributor to Chile's position as the world's largest copper producer.
Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, Ceibo's technology will scale up with on-site testing through the Lomas Lab, a Glencore world-scale test site, and the company's research and development branch. This agreement opens a significant commercial avenue for Ceibo, demonstrating its unique approach with a major mining company and affirming the value that Ceibo's advanced leaching technologies bring to copper assets globally.
Lomas Bayas is known for its focus on innovative and efficient new solutions. Through this partnership, they will be able to further capitalize on their copper reserves by increasing and optimizing extraction. It also positions Lomas Bayas at the vanguard of sustainable mining by increasing the volume of copper while simultaneously minimizing the impact. Lomas Bayas strives to maximize technologies that allow the production of copper cathodes from sulfide species containing chalcopyrite, with the goal of extending the life cycle of their mine.
Ceibo's leaching processes extract copper in all sulfides using existing leaching plants. This process more quickly and effectively catalyzes the oxidation in the ore through electrochemical reactions, resulting in higher recovery rates in shorter operational cycles. In recent industrial testing on over 20 chalcopyrite-rich ores, the technology has recovered over 75% of copper, a significant increase compared to traditional leaching. Ceibo's technologies can be used in many ways, including increasing the output of existing operations, extending the life of a mine, and enabling new brownfield and greenfield projects.
"We are excited to expand our partnership with Ceibo to scale an innovative technology that can transform the copper industry. Ceibo's ability to produce copper from sulfide-rich ores brings a huge value for assets like Lomas Bayas to sustain production while transitioning from oxides to sulfides," said Pablo Carvallo, General Manager of Lomas Bayas. "This increase will help us maximize our production to service growing worldwide demand."
"The copper industry is facing increased demand alongside environmental standards," said Cristobal Undurraga, co-founder and CEO of Ceibo. "We are thrilled to have such an innovative partner in Glencore's Lomas Bayas, who is at the forefront of adopting new technologies. Together, we are proving that our advanced leaching technologies are allowing the extraction of even more copper from the existing operation while significantly improving sustainability – all while we meet the urgent global need for copper in the clean energy transition."
With demand for copper surging worldwide, this partnership provides a mining industry template for how to immediately increase copper production by significantly extending the life and capacity of mine operations. Ceibo's technologies greatly reduce the implementation time and resource consumption of traditional production methods such as concentrators and smelting, which require many years to build and secure permit approvals and are burdened by an extreme reliance on water and energy.
About Ceibo
Ceibo is accelerating access to copper with its clean, innovative technologies that bridge the supply-demand gap to further the energy transition. Founded in 2021, with dual headquarters in the US and Chile, Ceibo brings together a diverse team of scientists, metallurgists, engineers, and operators with a common passion for using technology to advance net zero goals. For more information, please visit www.ceibo.tech . Media enquiries: ceibo@consortpartners.com
About Glencore in Chile
Glencore is engaged in the production and marketing of raw materials such as copper, sulfuric acid, and molybdenum. In Chile, it operates in the Antofagasta region, including Compañía Minera Lomas Bayas and the Altonorte Metallurgical Complex, and holds a 44% stake in Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi.
About Glencore
Glencore is one of the world's largest diversified natural resource companies, with more than 150,000 employees and contractors in over 35 countries. The company produces, processes, recycles, and markets more than 60 commodities that support decarbonization and meet current energy needs.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241120482815/en/
Media Contact
Consort Partners for Ceibo
ceibo@consortpartners.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Cobalt Price Recovery Uncertain as Battery Chemistry Shifts Erode Demand
Cobalt market watchers are warning that a near-term resurgence in prices and demand may not occur.
Cobalt prices have spent most of 2024 on the decline, falling to lows not seen since 2016. Values for the electric vehicle (EV) battery metal have fallen 74 percent from highs set in 2022 (US$81,969.70 per metric ton).
Prices are now sitting at the US$23,383.80 per metric ton level, an eight year low.
The primary factor weighing on cobalt prices is softening demand from the battery sector.
Cobalt usage has declined as the industry shifts away from previously popular nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) batteries and toward lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries, which don’t require any cobalt.
The issue has been further compounded by robust mining output from producers.
While some cobalt market segments may fare better than others, overall the sector's contraction is seen continuing.
“Cobalt hydroxide, a key raw material for cobalt sulfate and a byproduct of copper production, may experience temporary support from higher miner offers during Q4 term contract negotiations, though consistent oversupply driven by elevated copper prices in 2024 is likely to limit price gains,” reads a report from S&P Global Commodity Insights.
LFP batteries dominate as cobalt-rich chemistries decline
According to S&P Global, during the third quarter, the market share for NMC batteries stood at 24.6 percent, while competing chemistry LFP dominated with a 75.2 percent share of the market.
Unlike platinum and palladium, where substitution is relatively common as prices fluctuate, the firm believes the focus on cobalt-free battery chemistries will likely prevail. That's because they “are preferred for their safety, longer lifespan, and lower costs, and have gained traction, especially in China, in recent years.”
Rising plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) production and sales are also causing shifts in demand, as PHEVs require smaller batteries than fully battery electric vehicles.
Now industry participants are starting to realize the sobering reality that cobalt may be phased out completely.
This possibility has been affirmed in correspondence between Bloomberg and China's CMOC (OTC Pink:CMCLF,SHA:603993), the world’s largest cobalt-mining company.
“We predict that EV batteries will never return to the era that relies on cobalt,” said Zhou Xing, a spokesperson for CMOC. “Cobalt is far less important than imagined.”
Other segments supporting cobalt demand
Despite its shrinking market share in the auto sector, cobalt demand from the consumer electronics segment remains steady, largely driven by lithium-cobalt-oxide batteries that are approximately 55 percent cobalt.
Citing data from China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and China Customs, S&P Global notes that in July and August, China's mobile phone production rose 9.3 percent year-on-year, while exports grew 4.8 percent.
Cobalt demand will also be propped up by its use in superalloys, a niche that is expected to quadruple its cobalt demand by 2050, reaching 55,000 metric tons due to increased military, aerospace and satellite applications.
However, support from consumer electronics and superalloys likely won't be enough to absorb current oversupply.
“The cobalt market is currently expected to be in surplus through 2028, with the surplus peaking at 27,000 metric tons in 2024 and gradually decreasing to 3,000 metric tons by 2028," said Alice Yu, principal analyst at S&P Global.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Top 10 Cobalt Producers by Country (Updated 2024)
Battery metal cobalt has been in focus in recent years for its role in lithium-ion batteries, bringing attention to the top cobalt producing countries.
One of the metal’s main catalysts is the electric vehicle roll out. The lithium-ion batteries that power electric vehicles and energy storage require lithium, graphite and cobalt, among other raw materials, and demand for these important commodities is expected to keep rising as the shift toward clean technologies continues at a global scale.
Additionally, the metal is predominantly produced as a by-product of copper and nickel, two other metals that are important for the green transition.
However, supply growth in many of the battery metals has out scaled near-term demand, leading to a price pullback over the last two years. The cobalt market has trended downwards in 2024, with prices falling 10 percent from July to September.
As Roman Aubry, cobalt pricing analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, pointed out, Q3 cobalt values across all grades tracked by Benchmark Mineral Intelligence hit record lows unseen since 2017. The retraction was driven by prolonged weak demand and mounting surplus supply.
Investors interested in the sector should learn the top cobalt producers by country. According to the US Geological Survey, world production has increased significantly over the past two years. In 2023 total cobalt output topped 230,000 metric tons (MT), a large increase from 2022’s 190,000 MT, and a big jump from 2021's 165,000 MT.
Read on for a closer look at cobalt supply and which countries lead in production.
1. Democratic Republic of Congo
Mine production: 170,000 metric tons
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is by far the world’s largest producer of cobalt, with 170,000 metric tons of production in 2023, accounting for roughly 73 percent of global production. The country has been the top producer of the metal for some time, and is likely to remain crucial to the cobalt market for the foreseeable future.
However, cobalt mining in the DRC is associated with rampant human rights abuses and child labor, due in part to the large presence of unregulated artisanal mining. Attempts have been made to regulate the DRC's artisanal mining sector. But with hundreds of thousands of people relying on artisanal mining for income, eliminating it completely isn't possible.
Efforts to date include the creation of a new state company, Entreprise Générale du Cobalt, to buy and market all artisanal cobalt mined in the DRC; it was set up in 2019 and struggled to make progress. However, in February 2024, it signed an agreement with state miner Gecamines for exclusive mining rights to five mining areas.
Aside from that, the Responsible Minerals Initiative, in cooperation with the Global Battery Alliance, has drafted a framework for a regulated artisanal mining sector. The DRC's mines minister formally approved the ASM Cobalt Standard in 2022, and plans for assessing its effectiveness at pilot sites are being developed.
Outside the DRC's artisanal mining sphere, cobalt is largely produced as a by-product of copper mines, including the Tenke Fungurume mine, owned by the CMOC Group (OTC Pink:CMCLF,HKEX:3993); Metalkol RTR, owned by Eurasian Resources Group and the KOV; and the Mutanda and Mashamba East mines, owned by Glencore (LSE:GLEN,OTC Pink:GLCNF). While the CMOC Group has ramped up cobalt production at Tenke Fungurume, Glencore has dialed back its production.
2. Indonesia
Mine production: 17,000 metric tons
Indonesia has ramped up production to become the second largest producer of the EV metal, with 17,000 metric tons of cobalt in 2023 compared to only 2,700 MT of cobalt in 2021. This rapid change was the result of an increase in investment in Indonesia's battery metals supply chain, predominantly from Chinese companies, which moved in after Indonesia banned nickel ore exports in 2019. The country's higher cobalt production has come from four new high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL) facilities that process ore to produce both nickel and cobalt in mixed hydroxide precipitate, which can then be exported.
The first two HPAL operations came online in 2021 as part of the existing Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park. The facilities were developed by QMB New Materials, a joint venture between Tsingshan Holding Group, GEM (SZSE:002340), CATL (SZSE:300750) and Hanwa (TSE:8078). As of late 2023, two others are also operating in the country — one run by Huayue, owned by Tsingshan and CMOC Group, and one run by Halmahera Persada Lygend, owned by Lygend Resources (HKEX:2245) and Trimegah Bangun Persada (IDX:NCKL).
In mid-2024, partners Eramet (EPA:ERA) and chemical producer BASF (OTCQX:BFFAF,FWB:BASF) decided against executing the planned US$2.6 billion Sonic Bay nickel-cobalt hydrometallurgical complex due to nickel market dynamics, including low prices and oversupply. Sonic Bay would have processed ore from the Weda Bay nickel mine to produce 7,500 MT of cobalt and 67,000 MT of nickel per year.
According to a market report released in May 2023 from the Cobalt Institute, Indonesia has the potential to increase its cobalt output 10 fold by 2030. In the same vein, data from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence indicates that Indonesia's 2030 cobalt output will make up 20 percent of global production compared to 1 percent in 2021 and 5 percent in 2022.
While the market has been searching for an alternative to the DRC for its cobalt, both Indonesia's nickel industry and this rapid build out come with their own environmental concerns.
3. Russia
Mine production: 8,800 metric tons
After rising in 2022, Russia’s cobalt production declined in 2023, falling from 9,200 metric tons to 8,800 metric tons. While the country's cobalt reserves stand at 250,000 MT, Russia is still well behind the DRC in terms of production. Large Russian miner Norilsk Nickel produces cobalt and is among the world’s top five producers of the mineral.
With concerns about DRC cobalt running high, some automakers have been calling for increased electric vehicle battery production in Europe. There was hope that this push could boost Russia's future cobalt production — however, that may now be out of the question while the country wages war against Ukraine.
In April 2022, the US hit Russian cobalt with a 45 percent duty that was set to expire on January 1, 2024. The sanctions on Russian and Belarusian cobalt were extended in June 2024, and in September the US imposed a 25 percent tariff on Chinese cobalt.
4. Australia
Mine production: 4,600 metric tons
As the DRC becomes increasingly challenging for miners and as investors try to divert their interests away from Africa, Australia is another country that’s receiving more attention — the island nation's cobalt reserves are the second largest in the world at 1,700,000 MT.
Despite holding a large amount in reserves, Australian cobalt production contracted year-over-year from 2022 to 2023. After output spiked to 5,900 metric tons in 2022, cobalt production declined to 4,600 metric tons in 2023.
As is the case for many other countries on this list, cobalt is produced in Australia as a by-product of copper and nickel mining. The country’s nickel mines are located in the western part of the country, mostly around the Kalgoorlie and Leonora regions.
Additionally, the Australian government has been sending geologists to search for cobalt in mine waste, an effort that bore fruit when Queensland geologist Anita Parbhakar-Fox tested a copper mine waste sample that graded 7,000 parts per million cobalt.
The CEO of Australian company Cobalt Blue Holdings (ASX:COB,OTC Pink:CBBHF) described the discovery as a game changer to the Financial Times, estimating there could be up to 300,000 MT of cobalt in Australian mine waste.
Another important cobalt project in the country under Cobalt Blue is the Broken Hill project, which will allow for cobalt production on-site, rather than extracted as a by-product of nickel.
Broken Hill is planned to begin production in 2026, and is anticipated to have an output of around 4,000 metric tons of cobalt annually over a 20 year mine lifespan.
5. Madagascar
Mine production: 4,000 metric tons
Madagascar’s cobalt-mining industry produced 4,000 metric tons in 2023, up significantly from the 3,500 MT in 2022rebounded through 2021, putting out 3,500 MT in 2022, and 4,000 MT in 2023.
Much of the country’s cobalt production comes from the Ambatovy nickel-cobalt mine, owned through a joint venture by Japanese company Sumitomo (TSE:8053) and a Korean state-owned entity. The mine has faced production and profitability issues.
In August 2024, the companies submitted a debt restructuring plan to a London court. According to media reports, Sumitomo, the project's major shareholder, has accumulated 410 billion yen in losses stemming from the project, including a 265.5 billion yen total impairment loss.
Most recently, in October, a pipeline moving ore from the mine to a processing and refining plant had to be shut down due to damage. While production began slowly ramping up at the end of the month, Ambatovy's future remains uncertain.
6. Philippines
Mine production: 3,800 metric tons
The Philippines is the sixth largest cobalt producer in the world. The country’s cobalt production has remained steady over the last two years, coming in at 3,800 metric tons. The Asian country is also a top nickel producer.
The fate of mining in the Philippines was up in the air for a while as former President Rodrigo Duterte and former Environment Secretary Roy Cimatu called for a shutdown of all mines in the country based on environmental concerns. However, Duterte seemed to have a change of heart in early 2021, lifting a ban on new mine permits in an effort to boost revenues.
His successor, President Bongbong Marcos, has ordered the country's Department of Environment and Natural Resources to enforce stricter guidelines and safety protocols on both small- and large-scale mines. He hopes to bring illegal mining operations into compliance so they can operate legally and with safer conditions for employees.
7. Cuba
Mine production: 3,200 metric tons
Cuban cobalt production fell in 2023 to 3,200 metric tons, down from 3,700 MT in the year prior.
The country’s Moa region is home to the Moa joint venture nickel-cobalt operation held by Canadian firm Sherritt International (TSX:S,OTC Pink:SHERF) and the General Nickel Company of Cuba.
Moa uses an open-pit mining system to produce lateritic ore, which is processed into mixed sulfides containing nickel and cobalt using HPAL. The country’s state-owned nickel miner is the sole operator of the Che Guevara processing plant at Moa.
8. New Caledonia
Mine production: 3,000 metric tons
New Caledonia, a French overseas territory in the Pacific Ocean east of Australia, is known for its mineral industry, primarily focused on nickel and cobalt mining. According to a 2019 USGS Mineral Yearbook report, nickel mining contributes roughly 7 percent of the country’s annual GDP.
Although cobalt production in New Caledonia has increased year-over-year, climbing from 2,000 MT in 2022 to 3,000 metric tons in 2023, the island nation’s primary cobalt producing mine has been embroiled in controversy.
The Goro nickel and cobalt mine, which was brought into operation by Vale (NYSE:VALE), has been impacted by weak nickel prices and electoral reform unrest. In 2020, Vale opted to sell the project as part of a broader company restructuring. The following year, Goro was acquired by Prony Resources New Caledonia consortium, a joint venture owned by New Caledonian entities and international commodities trader Trafigura.
Earlier in 2024, the mine was again making headlines when Trafigura Group declined to provide additional funding for Prony Resources Nouvelle-Calédonie, as part of a French government rescue plan for New Caledonia's struggling mining sector.
9. Papua New Guinea
Mine production: 2,900 metric tons
Papua New Guinea has made the list of top cobalt producers by country for the sixth year in a row. In 2023, the small country off the coast of Australia produced 2,900 MT of cobalt as a by-product of nickel production, staying nearly flat with the previous year's output of 3,000 MT.
The country’s main cobalt producer is the Ramu nickel mine near Madang, a joint venture between private company MCC Ramu NiCo, Nickel 28 Capital (TSXV:NKL,OTC Pink:CONXF) and the Papua New Guinea government.
A mid-October report from Benchmark noted that by 2030, Chinese companies are expected to control 85 percent of cobalt output from Papua New Guinea, enhancing China’s global share of mined cobalt supply to 46 percent.
10. Turkey
Mine production: 2,800 metric tons
Taking the tenth spot on the list is Turkey, which has seen its annual cobalt output rise from 2,100 MT in 2022 to 2,800 metric tons in 2023. The nation also boasts large reserves totaling 91,000 MT.
A 2021 report from the British Geological Survey, underscored the importance of Turkey's cobalt potential amid the energy transition, noting “the greatest cobalt resource potential lies in laterite deposits in the Balkans and Turkey and in magmatic and black shale-hosted deposits in Fennoscandia.”
It went on to point out that in the Balkans and Turkey, 27 nickel laterite deposits are known to contain cobalt in significant quantities, with several deposits holding over 10,000 MT of cobalt metal. Currently, only nickel is extracted from these deposits, but advancements in processing technologies like high-pressure acid leaching may allow for cobalt recovery in the future.
In September 2024, the planned expansion of the Meta nickel-cobalt mine in Gördes sparked local resistance. Community members raised concerns that the project was destroying forests, draining water and harming agriculture. The mine is one of only a few nickel mines in Europe, making it important to the EU's ability to meet European demand for electric vehicle battery materials.
FAQs for cobalt production
What is the most common source of cobalt?
As cobalt is only found in a chemically combined form, it must be separated from mined ore. Most commonly, cobalt is produced as a by-product at copper or nickel mines. According to Benchmark Minerals, currently three-quarters of cobalt is produced from copper-primary mines and 25 percent is produced from nickel-primary mines. The agency forecasts that by 2030, cobalt production from copper-primary mines will fall to 57 percent, while that from nickel-primary mines will rise to 41 percent.
How rare is cobalt on Earth?
Cobalt is the 32nd most common element on Earth, according to the Cobalt Institute, meaning it isn't particularly rare. However, only a handful of countries have cobalt reserves over 300,000 MT, with the DRC coming in first place at 4 million MT, Australia in second at 1.5 million MT and Indonesia coming in third place with 600,000 MT. In fact, the DRC has higher cobalt reserves than the rest of the world combined.
How many years of cobalt are left?
How long it will take to deplete cobalt reserves and resources depends on the approach and speed with which electrification and a fully renewable society is approached, according to a 2019 study. Another factor is whether or not lithium-ion battery formulas that require cobalt will continue to be the norm in the future. If widespread cobalt substitution does take place, that will ease demand pressures on the metal.
Why is cobalt so valuable?
Cobalt has risen in recent years due to supply chain difficulties and the metal's necessity in many lithium-ion battery cathodes, with prices peaking in March and April 2022 at over US$80,000 per MT. However, prices have fallen since then, and sat around the US$33,000 mark as of November 2023. The EV story has led to increased cobalt supply, meaning that there will be short-term price pressures due to oversupply as demand continues to rise in the coming years.
What is the problem with cobalt mining?
Most cobalt production takes place in the DRC, which is known for artisanal mining. Artisanal miners are adults and children who are not employed by mining companies, but mine independently using their own tools or just their hands.
A 2023 ABC news report on the country's artisanal mining industry estimates that 200,000 artisanal miners are working on cobalt deposits; unfortunately, a lack of oversight and safety measures means injuries and death are more frequent than in regulated mining. While organizations are working to keep the supply chain transparent, it is hard to fully avoid cobalt that is sourced through child labor and human rights abuses.
Other countries are not exempt from concerns related to mining cobalt — Indonesia's burgeoning cobalt production comes with the vast environmental concerns that plague the nation's nickel industry.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Cobalt Market Update: Q3 2024 in Review
A contraction continued in the cobalt market during the year's third quarter, with metal values falling from US$27,151.50 per metric ton (MT) on July 1 to US$24,299 by the end of September.
The 10 percent decline is part of a larger 16.56 percent year-to-date contraction.
“This quarter saw minimal pricing movements as the market experienced a prolonged period of low prices,” said Roman Aubry, cobalt pricing analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence.
He went on to note that during the third quarter, all of the cobalt grades Benchmark follows sank to their lowest levels since the company began tracking prices for the battery metal in 2017.
Cobalt metal price chart, Q3 2024.
Chart via Trading Economics.
“Prices for cobalt metal approached US$10 per pound, and cobalt hydroxide, a feedstock for cobalt metal and battery chemicals, approached US$6 per pound due to weak buyer interest and bearish market outlook,” he said.
“Cobalt sulfate prices had initially held a floor of RMB 27,500 per MT (US$3,857.23)," continued Aubry.
"However, as the quarter came to an end, cheap recycled cobalt sulfate in China undercut prices from the virgin market and has led to a further decrease in prices.”
Cobalt demand in the doldrums
The cobalt price pressure seen during the third quarter was largely due to a combination of oversupply and weakening demand, particularly from the electric vehicle (EV) battery sector.
The market is grappling with the effects of cobalt's diminishing role in battery chemistries as manufacturers increasingly turn to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries, which contain no cobalt, or opt for nickel-based alternatives with lower cobalt content. This shift has been fueled by efforts to mitigate the environmental and ethical issues associated with cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the largest cobalt-producing nation.
Additionally, as cobalt production capacity expands in countries like Australia and Angola, oversupply pressures are expected to persist, keeping prices relatively low in the near term.
Industry experts predict that unless there is a significant surge in demand from emerging technologies or battery innovations, cobalt prices will remain suppressed, reflecting a structural change in market dynamics.
“The supply of cobalt has proven to exceed what the market has been able to absorb, and weak buyer interest and full stocks have led to prices being incapable of recovering,” noted Aubry. “Overall, a bearish market is expected through 2025 as participants speculate on what is the lowest price cobalt can fall to.”
Swelling cobalt supply prevents price growth
For Project Blue’s Jack Bedder, the most prevalent trend weighing on the cobalt market in Q3 was oversupply.
“Refined cobalt metal producers in China kept on increasing production volumes for an increased metal premium dampening prices even further,” Bedder told the Investing News Network (INN).
“(London Metal Exchange) off-warrant stockpiled cobalt metal has been rising, and trade data indicated an increase in China’s cobalt metal exports to the European market," the expert added.
Bedder, who is the co-founder and director of the critical metals consultancy, also pointed to higher output in the DRC and Indonesia as a headwind to cobalt price growth.
“Oversupply of cobalt intermediate continues, underpinned by increased production from the DRC’s cobalt hydroxide and Indonesian Ni-Co MHP (nickel-cobalt mixed hydroxide precipitate),” he said.
While Bedder explained that declining prices have caused companies to reschedule production plans and reduce their production guidance, there is still promise on the development side.
In mid-August, Electra Battery Materials (TSXV:ELBM,NASDAQ:ELBM) received a US$20 million grant from the US Department of Defense to support its cobalt refinery project in Ontario, which it says is set to be North America's first producer of battery-grade cobalt sulfate. Located in Temiskaming Shores, the C$250 million facility aims to strengthen the EV supply chain and reduce US reliance on foreign sources for critical minerals.
The funding aligns with the US' strategy of securing essential minerals for defense and technology sectors.
Less than a month later, the company garnered another funding infusion.
“Electra received ample financial backing from the US government to develop its cobalt sulfate refinery in Canada,” said Bedder. “The company has received a total of US$40 million in Q3 2024.”
Electra’s Department of Defense funding wasn’t the only news on the development side.
In late June, Nth Cycle commissioned a 21,000 square foot facility designed to refine metal scrap, e-waste and refinery waste into high-purity critical metals like nickel and cobalt.
“Nth Cycle commenced commercial production of Ni-Co MHP from its refinery in Fairfield, Ohio,” Bedder explained to INN. “The refinery will recover metal from electronic waste and scrap processing up to 3,100 MT per year of scrap materials to produce up to 900 MT per year MHP.”
US and Canada boost EV tariffs
In addition to building domestic cobalt mining and refining capacity, the US and Canada are working to reduce purchases of Chinese EVs. Both countries have implemented steep tariffs on EVs originating in China.
At the end of August, the Canadian government levied a 100 percent tariff on Chinese EVs. The heightened tariff followed a similar announcement out of the US in May. America also added smaller tariffs on strategic goods necessary for EV production, such as solar cells, semiconductors and lithium batteries.
While the spirit of the new EV taxes aims to spur on domestic production and EV sales, both Aubry and Bedder said they don’t see the tariffs supporting cobalt price growth.
“It is unlikely to have any effect in the short term, as Chinese EVs still remain much cheaper than their western counterparts, even with the tariffs in place, so there is limited incentive for North American producers to build domestic capacity as they are not cost competitive,” said Aubry.
Expressing a similar sentiment, Project Blue’s Bedder said he sees the taxation as a potential catalyst for North American production in the long term. “I don’t see (tariffs) impacting the cobalt market in the short term. Chinese EVs in the US do not currently sell well,” he commented to INN. “However, in the long term, tariffs and the ban on Chinese-connected vehicles may give some support to cobalt demand, as China will likely be targeting LFP EVs.”
China adds to cobalt-refining capacity
As North America looks to bolster ex-China supply, the Asian nation continues to build its cobalt presence.
“In August, GEM (SZSE:002340) commenced commercial production of a 10,000 MT per year refinery in Hubei province, China. The refinery will be using recycled material to produce standard-grade cobalt metal 99.8 percent,” Bedder said.
He also noted that Tengyuan Cobalt (SZSE:301219) has announced plans to build a new nickel-cobalt refinery in Ganzhou province, China. Commercial production is planned for the fourth quarter of 2025.
“Last year, the company produced 15,400 MT of cobalt metal after completing expansions in December 2022,” he said.
Some of that increased output could be earmarked for China’s strategic cobalt reserve. In late May, reports surfaced that the country’s State Reserve Bureau planned on purchasing 15,000 MT from domestic producers.
While Benchmark’s Aubry sees the move as largely supportive of China’s cobalt sector, he told INN that doesn’t see the purchase adding tailwinds to prices for the critical battery material.
“Although this purchase was significantly bigger than previous years, the increased tonnage of the purchase is largely believed to have been a measure taken by the Chinese State Reserve Bureau to offset the significant ramp up in Chinese cobalt metal production capacity,” he said. “As a result, it did not have the strengthening effect that many hoped it would, as Chinese metal production still exceeds what the market is able to absorb.”
What factors will move the cobalt market in 2024?
As the end of 2024 approaches, INN asked both experts what cobalt investors should watch heading into 2025.
Benchmark’s Aubry advised monitoring cobalt contracting.
“The price floor for cobalt hydroxide is currently set due to long-term contracts that are set to expire early in 2025, and as a result we may see further price erosion moving into next year,” he said.
While he cautioned that the supply/demand story is still very weak moving forward, he noted that cobalt’s future is heavily correlated to copper. “If prices come off further, we may see margins squeezed due to an increasing oversupply next year,” he said. “If the copper market stays strong, producers in the DRC will be incentivized to continue mining copper and cobalt, even if the price of cobalt hydroxide declines below US$6 per pound.”
Moving into to 2025, Bedder is tracking cobalt stockpiling from China's State Reserve Bureau.
High quantities of Chinese cobalt flowing into European markets, coinciding with existing London Metal Exchange warehouse inventories, is another development he is monitoring.
Elsewhere, Bedder noted the ongoing dispute between Glencore (LSE:GLEN,OTC Pink:GLCNF) and the DRC government.
“Much like the situation with CMOC Group (OTC Pink:CMCLF,SZSE:603993) in 2022, the DRC government has alleged that Glencore’s subsidiary, Kamoto Copper, owes the state 800 million euros (US$894 million) related to royalty payments,” said Bedder. “As we approach Q4 and 2025, we are eager to see how this might impact cobalt prices, particularly if significant evidence supports the claim. Notably, this also comes after Glencore’s recent decision to halt cobalt hydroxide stockpiling in the DRC.”
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Editorial Disclosure: The Investing News Network does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported in the interviews it conducts. The opinions expressed in these interviews do not reflect the opinions of the Investing News Network and do not constitute investment advice. All readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence.
Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B for the Period Ending 30 September 2024
High-Tech Metals Limited (ASX: HTM) (High-Tech, HTM or the Company), a critical battery minerals exploration Company, is pleased to provide the following report on its activities for the Quarter ending 30 September 2024 (“Quarter”). The Company’s primary activities during the quarter were the desktop review of Werner Lake Project, Canada, (“Werner Lake”).
HIGHLIGHTS
- HTM nears completion of a desktop review of Werner Lake Project compiling all available historical data and newly acquired data.
- Desktop review to prepare for future exploration of the Werner Lake Project to unlock value.
Sonu Cheema, Executive Director, commented:
"It is a pleasure to update the market on quarterly activities of High-Tech’s, specifically the Werner Lake cobalt, nickel, and PGE Project. Over the last 18 months High-Tech has generated significant data from the successful sampling and drilling programs. Through the compilation of the available historical data and the data derived from our successful exploration, I believe we will unlock the true value of Werner Lake.”
Desktop Review – Werner Lake
HTM commenced a desktop review of Werner Lake in the previous quarter aimed at delineating future exploration programs based on all available historical data and newly acquired data. The data derived from the successful Drilling Program, which focused on high priority drill targets, adds to the extensive data available on Werner Lake (refer ASX announcement – Drilling Results at Werner Lake – released 27 November 2023).
High-Tech’s Exploration at Werner Lake
From the outset of the 2023 campaign, focus was on testing new targets away from the Werner Lake deposit. Two areas were selected for a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of the potential to locate economic cobalt, nickel, and PGE targets. These are shown below, essentially, the ‘East’ and ‘West’ blocks or grids.
The objective was to test cobalt, copper and nickel targets on a portion of the Werner Lake Property. The drill program was planned and carried out by the in-country geological consultants, Apex Geoservice (APEX). The program was completed on time and under budget.
Targets were based on a comprehensive appraisal and evaluation of historical geological and production data covering exploration and production on and around the Property, and on the somewhat limited geological and production data from the Gordon Lake Cu-Ni mine.
Table 1 – Total of 798 metres of NQ core was drilled over six holes.
Figure 1 – Werner Lake final DDH locations and access.
The results from the ground-based magnetometer survey, lithogeochemical sampling, and prospecting provided additional focus with the primary targets all located on the east block, east of Gordon Lake and the Gordon Lake mine (refer ASX announcement – WERNER LAKE SAMPLING DISCOVER HIGH GRADE Ni SULPHIDE & Cu-Co – released 30 August 2023).
Click here for the full ASX Release
This article includes content from High-Tech Metals, licensed for the purpose of publishing on Investing News Australia. This article does not constitute financial product advice. It is your responsibility to perform proper due diligence before acting upon any information provided here. Please refer to our full disclaimer here.
Sherritt Reports Third Quarter 2024 Results; Strong Operational Performance at Metals with Significant Improvements to Net Direct Cash Costs; Increased Available Liquidity in Canada
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Sherritt International Corporation ("Sherritt", the "Corporation") (TSX: S), a world leader in using hydrometallurgical processes to mine and refine nickel and cobalt metals deemed critical for the energy transition today reported its financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
Leon Binedell, President and CEO of Sherritt commented, "Our Metals division has achieved remarkable progress, with finished nickel production reaching its highest quarterly level in two years. We have successfully reduced our net direct cash costs to US$5.16 per pound, demonstrating a significant year-over-year improvement even with materially lower cobalt by-product prices. Our Power division has also excelled, recording the highest quarterly electricity production in nine years. Additionally, we completed work to bring another gas turbine online, enabling us to generate electricity from new gas wells, including a new well that began production in October. This will further increase production and allow us to realize higher distributions of dividends in Canada going forward."
Mr. Binedell continued, "Despite this quarter's lower nickel and cobalt prices, our available liquidity in Canada increased 27% to $71 million. We are beginning to realize savings from the cost reduction initiatives announced in the first half of the year and we made additional workforce reductions in the third quarter to lower our costs further. During the fourth quarter, we expect to receive another significant distribution from Power and the recommencement of dividends from the Cobalt Swap agreement. Looking ahead, phase two of our expansion at the Moa JV is advancing as planned, with commissioning and ramp-up scheduled for the first half of next year which will increase our mixed sulphide production to our refinery, displacing lower-margin third-party feed and maximizing our profitability."
THIRD QUARTER 2024 SELECTED DEVELOPMENTS
- Sherritt's share (1) of finished nickel and cobalt production at the Moa Joint Venture ("Moa JV") was 4,333 tonnes and 454 tonnes, respectively.
- Sherritt's share of finished nickel and cobalt sales was 3,538 tonnes and 421 tonnes, respectively. Sales volumes were below production, consistent with Q3 2023, primarily due to the third quarter typically being a seasonally softer quarter for sales due to summer shutdowns of steel mills and some customers deferring sales to the fourth quarter. In addition, the Canadian rail lock-out, which although resolved quickly, temporarily disrupted logistics deferring some sales which otherwise would have occurred during the quarter. Sherritt expects stronger demand from customers in the fourth quarter.
- Net direct cash cost ("NDCC") (2) was US$5.16/lb benefiting from a 19% year-over-year improvement in mining, processing and refining costs per pound of nickel sold ("MPR/lb"), the largest component of NDCC (2) .
- Electricity production was 230 GWh which was the highest quarterly electricity production in nine years and reflects Sherritt's multiyear efforts to maximize value and increase dividends in Canada from its Power division by bringing new gas wells into production, improving equipment availability and increasing utilization rates.
- Electricity unit operating cost (2) was $44.95/MWh reflecting timing of planned maintenance which was completed during the quarter, partly offset by higher sales volume.
- 2024 guidance for Metals and Power production volumes, NDCC (1) , electricity unit operating costs (1) and spending on capital (1) remain unchanged.
- Sherritt continues to realize savings in line with its estimated $15.0 million in annual savings from the workforce reductions announced in the first half of 2024. During the quarter, Sherritt made further reductions to streamline its organizational structure which are expected to result in approximately $2.2 million of additional annualized savings.
- Net earnings from continuing operations were $1.8 million, or nil per share.
- Adjusted net loss from continuing operations (2) was $11.5 million or $(0.03) per share, which primarily excludes a non-cash $11.5 million revaluation gain on the net receivable pursuant to the Cobalt Swap (3) on updates to valuation assumptions.
- Adjusted EBITDA (2) was $10.5 million.
- Available liquidity in Canada as at September 30, 2024 was $71.4 million supported by $35.9 million of proceeds from operating activities for Fort Site which included strong receipts on fertilizer sales and presales, $3.4 million on settlement of in-the-money nickel put options and $0.9 million of dividends from Energas. These receipts were partly offset primarily by $10.8 million used in Power to support planned maintenance activities and $5.4 million in payments on contractually obligated rehabilitation and closure costs related to legacy Oil and Gas assets in Spain.
- Phase two of the Moa JV expansion is continuing to advance with commissioning and ramp up expected in the first half of 2025. The Moa JV finalized and began utilizing its US$12.0 million of foreign currency financing from a Cuban bank to support international payments related to construction of the Sixth Leach Train, the primary component of phase two of the expansion project.
- Advanced engineering and process flowsheet development to enhance and derisk the flowsheet on the mixed hydroxide precipitate ("MHP") processing project ("MHP Project") which already yielded positive results for metal recoveries and impurity removals and continued external engagement with governments, potential customers and funding partners.
(1) | References to "Sherritt's share" is consistent with the Corporation's definition of reportable segments for financial statement purposes. Sherritt's share of "Metals" includes the Corporation's 50% interest in the Moa JV, its 100% interest in the utility and fertilizer operations in Fort Saskatchewan ("Fort Site") and its 100% interests in subsidiaries established to buy, market and sell certain of the Moa JV's nickel and cobalt production and the Corporation's cobalt inventory received under the Cobalt Swap agreement ("Metals Marketing"). Sherritt's share of Power includes the Corporation's 33⅓% interest in Energas S.A. ("Energas"). References to Corporate and Other and Oil and Gas includes the Corporation's 100% interest in these businesses. Corporate and Other refers to the Corporate office and Technologies. References to Fort Site directly is to the Corporation's 100% interest in the utility and fertilizer operations. |
(2) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(3) | For additional information on the Cobalt Swap, see Note 12 – Advances, loans receivable and other financial assets of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE QUARTER
Subsequent to the quarter end:
- Received an additional $1.6 million in cash on settlement of nickel put options.
- Paid $9.4 million in interest on its Second Lien Notes.
- On October 18, 2024, Cuba experienced a nationwide power outage and following which the Moa nickel mine began operating at a reduced capacity of 50% to 60% with power sourced from the mine site's own power generating capabilities. The Moa nickel mine and all Energas facilities returned to full operating capacity on October 27, 2024 with Energas playing an instrumental role in assisting to restore power to the Cuban national grid. Despite the power outage and adverse weather from a tropical storm that occurred shortly after, there was not a material impact to mixed sulphides production. Moreover, the Corporation's refinery in Alberta strategically built-up feed inventory earlier in the year, ensuring reliable feed throughput for finished nickel production. As a result, Sherritt maintains its 2024 production and unit operating cost guidance ranges.
Q3 2024 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||
$ millions, except per share amount | 2024 | 2023 | Change | 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||
Revenue | $ | 32.9 | $ | 36.4 | (10%) | $ | 113.1 | $ | 188.5 | (40%) |
Combined revenue (1) | 126.4 | 128.0 | (1%) | 417.3 | 512.4 | (19%) | ||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture | (2.3) | (23.8) | 90% | (26.6) | - | - | ||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | 1.8 | (24.8) | 107% | (50.6) | (10.9) | (364%) | ||||
Net earnings (loss) for the period | 2.1 | (24.8) | 108% | (49.9) | (11.2) | (346%) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | 10.5 | (2.2) | 577% | 17.0 | 53.2 | (68%) | ||||
Adjusted loss from continuing operations (1) | (11.5) | (12.1) | 5% | (46.1) | (0.8) | nm (2) | ||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations ($ per share) | 0.00 | (0.06) | 100% | (0.13) | (0.03) | (333%) | ||||
Adjusted net (loss) earnings from continuing operations ($ per share) (1) | (0.03) | (0.03) | - | (0.12) | - | - | ||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities | 20.4 | 4.4 | 364% | (4.4) | 46.3 | (110%) | ||||
Combined free cash flow (1) | 10.2 | (11.7) | 187% | (1.0) | 23.2 | (104%) | ||||
Average exchange rate (CAD/US$) | 1.366 | 1.341 | 2% | 1.362 | 1.346 | 1% |
(1) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) | Not meaningful ("nm"). |
$ millions, as at | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||||
Canada | $ | 41.0 | $ | 21.5 | 91% | |||||
Cuba (1) | 106.0 | 96.3 | 10% | |||||||
Other | 1.6 | 1.3 | 23% | |||||||
148.6 | 119.1 | 25% | ||||||||
Loans and borrowings | 371.1 | 355.6 | 4% | |||||||
The Corporation's share of cash and cash equivalents in the Moa Joint Venture, not included in the above balances: | $ | 2.3 | $ | 5.9 | (60%) |
(1) | As at September 30, 2024, $104.2 million of the Corporation's cash and cash equivalents was held by Energas (December 31, 2023 - $93.9 million). |
Cash and cash equivalents as at September 30, 2024 were $148.6 million, increasing from $132.3 million as at June 30, 2024.
As at September 30, 2024, total available liquidity in Canada, which is composed of cash and cash equivalents in Canada of $41.0 million and available credit facilities of $30.4 million was $71.4 million increasing from $55.9 million as at June 30, 2024. Available liquidity in Canada was supported by $35.9 million of proceeds from operating activities for Fort Site which included strong receipts on fertilizer sales and presales, $3.4 million on the settlement of in-the-money nickel put options and $0.9 million of dividends from Energas. These receipts were partly offset primarily by $10.8 million used in Power to support planned maintenance activities and $5.4 million in payment on contractually obligated rehabilitation and closure costs related to legacy Oil and Gas assets in Spain.
For 2024, Sherritt continues to expect distributions under the Cobalt Swap agreement in the fourth quarter of the year. The Moa JV's cash and cobalt distributions to the Corporation are determined based on available cash in excess of liquidity requirements. Determinants of liquidity include anticipated nickel and cobalt prices and sales volumes, planned spending on capital at the Moa JV including growth capital, working capital needs, expected financing and other expected liquidity requirements. Available cash is also impacted by changes in working capital primarily related to changes in inventory, and timing of receipts and payments, including receipts on nickel and cobalt sales subsequent to shipment.
In Sherritt's second quarter results, the Corporation indicated approximately $50.0 million was expected to be received during the fourth quarter from the Cobalt Swap agreement (including both Sherritt's share and GNC's (2) redirected share), which was based on the midpoint of the Moa JV's 2024 guidance ranges for production volumes, unit operating costs (1) and spending on capital (1) as disclosed in the Outlook section of the MD&A, and the first half 2024 nickel and cobalt average reference prices of US$8.00/lb and US$13.50/lb, respectively.
With the third quarter average reference prices of both nickel and cobalt being below the first half 2024 average reference prices, management is focusing efforts to maximize cash flows from sales of available inventories and maximize the amount to be received in the fourth quarter under the Cobalt Swap up to the $50.0 million (including both Sherritt's share and GNC's redirected share) that was previously indicated. Refer to the risks related to Sherritt's corporate structure in the Corporation's 2023 Annual Information Form for further information on risks related to distributions from the Moa JV.
Given its strong operating performance during 2024, Energas generated sufficient liquidity to distribute to Sherritt dividends in Canada of $0.9 million and $6.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively. Based on 2024 guidance estimates for production volumes, unit operating costs (1) and spending on capital (1) disclosed in the Outlook section of the MD&A, Sherritt continues to expect total dividends in Canada from Energas of approximately $10.0 million in 2024. Refer to the risks related to Sherritt's corporate structure in the Corporation's 2023 Annual Information Form for further information on risks related to dividends in Canada from Energas.
During Q3 2024, the Moa JV finalized and began utilizing its US$12.0 million of foreign currency financing from a Cuban bank to support international payments related to construction of the Sixth Leach Train, the primary component of phase two of the expansion project.
As at September 30, 2024, the Corporation was in compliance with all its debt covenants.
Subsequent to the quarter end, Sherritt received an additional $1.6 million in cash on settlement of nickel put options and paid $9.4 million in interest on its Second Lien Notes. At the interest payment date, the Corporation was not required to make a mandatory redemption of Second Lien Notes as it did not have Excess Cash Flow as defined in the Second Lien Notes indenture agreement for the two-quarter period ended June 30, 2024.
(1) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) | General Nickel Company S.A. ("GNC"). |
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Metals
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||
$ millions (Sherritt's share), except as otherwise noted | 2024 | 2023 | Change | 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (1) | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 112.6 | $ | 115.7 | (3%) | $ | 378.3 | $ | 477.8 | (21%) |
Cost of sales | 110.1 | 128.1 | (14%) | 385.7 | 454.8 | (15%) | ||||
Earnings (loss )from operations | 0.8 | (14.9) | 105% | (17.5) | 19.9 | (188%) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA (2) | 14.9 | (0.8) | nm (5) | 25.4 | 62.3 | (59%) | ||||
CASH FLOW (1) | ||||||||||
Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities (2) | $ | 34.8 | $ | 10.7 | 225% | $ | 87.2 | $ | 112.5 | (22%) |
Free cash flow (2) | 24.2 | (3.0) | 907% | 59.4 | 73.1 | (19%) | ||||
PRODUCTION VOLUMES (tonnes) | ||||||||||
Mixed Sulphides | 4,148 | 4,037 | 3% | 12,295 | 11,570 | 6% | ||||
Finished Nickel | 4,333 | 3,841 | 13% | 11,313 | 10,592 | 7% | ||||
Finished Cobalt | 454 | 410 | 11% | 1,138 | 1,108 | 3% | ||||
Fertilizer | 65,205 | 48,400 | 35% | 182,624 | 158,615 | 15% | ||||
NICKEL RECOVERY (3) (%) | 85% | 88% | (3%) | 87% | 87% | - | ||||
SALES VOLUMES (tonnes) | ||||||||||
Finished Nickel | 3,538 | 2,845 | 24% | 11,352 | 9,377 | 21% | ||||
Finished Cobalt | 421 | 526 | (20%) | 1,173 | 2,321 | (49%) | ||||
Fertilizer | 31,245 | 21,389 | 46% | 115,836 | 114,652 | 1% | ||||
AVERAGE-REFERENCE PRICE (4) (US$ per pound) | ||||||||||
Nickel | $ | 7.37 | $ | 9.23 | (20%) | $ | 7.74 | $ | 10.34 | (25%) |
Cobalt | 12.25 | 16.58 | (26%) | 13.16 | 16.50 | (20%) | ||||
AVERAGE-REALIZED PRICE (2) (CAD) | ||||||||||
Nickel ($ per pound) | $ | 10.11 | $ | 12.54 | (19%) | $ | 10.41 | $ | 14.29 | (27%) |
Cobalt ($ per pound) | 12.42 | 17.64 | (30%) | 13.70 | 17.51 | (22%) | ||||
Fertilizer ($ per tonne) | 434.58 | 389.43 | 12% | 503.33 | 612.73 | (18%) | ||||
UNIT OPERATING COST (2) (US$) | ||||||||||
Nickel - net direct cash cost (US$ per pound) | $ | 5.16 | $ | 7.24 | (29%) | $ | 6.10 | $ | 6.97 | (12%) |
SPENDING ON CAPITAL (2) (CAD) | ||||||||||
Sustaining | $ | 7.5 | $ | 12.8 | (41%) | $ | 22.3 | $ | 32.3 | (31%) |
Growth | 3.7 | 2.9 | 28% | 6.1 | 9.1 | (33%) | ||||
$ | 11.2 | $ | 15.7 | (29%) | $ | 28.4 | $ | 41.4 | (31%) |
(1) | The Financial Highlights, and cash flow amounts for Metals combine the operations of the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing. Breakdowns of revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and the components of free cash flow (cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and Property, plant and equipment expenditures) for each of these operations are included in the Combined Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Free cash flow reconciliations, respectively, in the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(3) | The nickel recovery rate measures the amount of finished nickel that is produced compared to the original nickel content of the ore that was mined. |
(4) | Reference sources: Nickel – London Metal Exchange ("LME"). Cobalt - Average standard-grade cobalt price published per Argus. |
(5) | Not meaningful ("nm"). |
Revenue
Metals revenue in Q3 2024 was $112.6 million compared to $115.7 million in Q3 2023.
Nickel revenue in Q3 2024 was $78.8 million compared to $78.6 million in Q3 2023. In Q3 2024, the 24% increase in nickel sales volume was offset by a 19% lower average-realized price (1) . In Q3 2024, sales volumes were below production, consistent with Q3 2023, primarily due to the third quarter typically being a seasonally softer quarter for sales due to summer shutdowns of steel mills and some customers deferring sales to the fourth quarter. In addition, the Canadian rail lock-out, which although resolved quickly, temporarily disrupted logistics deferring some sales which otherwise would have occurred during the quarter. Sherritt expects stronger demand from customers in the fourth quarter.
Cobalt revenue in Q3 2024 was $11.5 million compared to $20.4 million in Q3 2023. Lower revenue in Q3 2024 was primarily due to the timing of receipts and sales of cobalt by Sherritt under the Cobalt Swap agreement and lower average-realized prices (1) . The average-realized prices (1) for cobalt were 30% lower in Q3 2024 compared to Q3 2023. For more information regarding the timing of Cobalt Swap distributions in 2024, refer to the Cobalt Swap sales section below.
Fertilizer revenue in Q3 2024 was $13.6 million compared to $8.3 million in Q3 2023. Fertilizer sales volumes were 46% higher compared to Q3 2023, reflecting timing of fall season sales and higher available production for sale. In addition, average-realized prices (1) for fertilizers were 12% higher in Q3 2024 compared to Q3 2023.
Cobalt Swap sales
To date in 2024, as expected, Sherritt has not received cobalt distributions under the Cobalt Swap. In 2023, Sherritt had received 100% of the annual maximum amount of cobalt (2,082 tonnes) and had sold approximately 97% of that cobalt by the end of the third quarter of the year.
While the timing of receipts and sales of cobalt under the Cobalt Swap results in variances in cobalt sales volumes, revenue and cost of sales for Sherritt, they do not have a material impact on earnings from operations, average-realized prices (1) , cobalt by-product credits, or NDCC (1) as the variance in revenue and costs of Sherritt's share of cobalt under the Cobalt Swap is offset by Sherritt's share of revenue and costs of the Moa JV and the cost of cobalt sold on volumes of cobalt redirected from GNC is determined based on the in-kind value of cobalt calculated as the cobalt reference price from the month preceding distribution less a mutually agreed selling cost adjustment.
For 2024, Sherritt continues to expect distributions under the Cobalt Swap agreement in the fourth quarter of the year. The Moa JV's cash and cobalt distributions to the Corporation are determined based on available cash in excess of liquidity requirements. Determinants of liquidity include anticipated nickel and cobalt prices and sales volumes, planned spending on capital at the Moa JV including growth capital, working capital needs, expected financing and other expected liquidity requirements. Available cash is also impacted by changes in working capital primarily related to changes in inventory, and timing of receipts and payments, including receipts on nickel and cobalt sales subsequent to shipment.
In Sherritt's second quarter results, the Corporation indicated approximately $50.0 million was expected to be received during the fourth quarter from the Cobalt Swap agreement (including both Sherritt's share and GNC's redirected share), which was based on the midpoint of the Moa JV's 2024 guidance ranges for production volumes, unit operating costs (1) and spending on capital (1) as disclosed in the Outlook section of the MD&A, and the first half 2024 nickel and cobalt average reference prices of US$8.00/lb and US$13.50/lb, respectively.
With third quarter average reference prices of both nickel and cobalt being below the first half 2024 average reference prices, management is focusing efforts to maximize cash flows from sales of available inventories and maximize the amount received in the fourth quarter under the Cobalt Swap up to the $50.0 million (including both Sherritt's share and GNC's redirected share) that was previously indicated. Refer to the risks related to Sherritt's corporate structure in the Corporation's 2023 Annual Information Form for further information on risks related to distributions from the Moa JV.
Production
Mixed sulphides production at the Moa JV for Q3 2024 was 4,148 tonnes 3% higher, compared to Q3 2023. Lower maintenance and improved feed to the processing plant following the completion of the new Slurry Preparation Plant ("SPP") in the first quarter of 2024 contributed to higher production.
Sherritt's share of finished nickel and cobalt production for Q3 2024 was 4,333 tonnes and 454 tonnes, 13% and 11% higher, respectively, compared to Q3 2023 primarily due to higher mixed sulphides feed availability.
Sherritt maintains its 2024 production guidance ranges for finished nickel and cobalt.
Fertilizer production for Q3 2024 was 65,205 tonnes, 35% higher compared to Q3 2023 in line with higher metals production, implementation of operational improvements during the year, and due to the unplanned ammonia plant maintenance that limited production in 2023.
NDCC (1)
NDCC (1) per pound of nickel sold for Q3 2024 was US$5.16/lb, compared to US$7.24/lb in Q3 2023. NDCC (1) significantly improved primarily as a result of lower MPR/lb partly offset by lower cobalt by-product credits (2) as a result of lower average-realized prices (1) for cobalt. MPR/lb was 19% lower for Q3 2024, compared to Q3 2023 primarily due to lower sulphur, natural gas and diesel prices, lower maintenance costs and lower sulphuric acid purchases, operational improvements, and the impact of higher nickel sales volumes. Prices for sulphur, natural gas and diesel were 13%, 64% and 10% lower in Q3 2024 compared to Q3 2023.
Fertilizer net by-product credits were significantly higher in Q3 2024 compared to Q3 2023 as a result of higher sales volumes and average-realized prices (1) and lower maintenance costs.
NDCC (1) for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was US$6.10/lb and Sherritt maintains its 2024 guidance range for NDCC (1) at US$5.50 to US$6.00/lb.
Spending on capital (1)
Sustaining spending on capital for Q3 2024 was $7.5 million compared to $12.8 million in Q3 2023. Sustaining spending on capital of $22.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 is in line with 2024 guidance.
Growth spending on capital for Q3 2024 was $3.7 million compared to $2.9 million in Q3 2023. Spending in 2024 was primarily related to the second phase of the Moa JV expansion program and is in line with 2024 guidance.
(1) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) | Cobalt by-product credits include Sherritt's share of cobalt revenue per pound of nickel sold only. |
Expansion program and strategic developments
Moa JV expansion program update
Phase two of the Moa JV's expansion program, the Processing Plant, is continuing to advance. During the third quarter of 2024 piping installation continued and brick lining of vessels started.
During the quarter, the Moa JV finalized and began utilizing its US$12 million of foreign currency financing from a Cuban bank to support international payments related to construction of the Sixth Leach Train, the primary component of phase two of the expansion project.
Phase two commissioning and ramp up remains scheduled for 2025 with Sherritt expecting to commence the ramp up during the first half of the year. With completion of phase two, annual mixed sulphide precipitate production is expected to further increase toward the combined expansion target, including the new SPP, of approximately 20% of contained nickel and cobalt and is expected to fill the refinery to nameplate capacity to maximize profitability from the joint venture's own mine feed, displacing lower margin third-party feeds and increasing overall finished nickel and cobalt production.
Strategic developments
Sherritt, through its MHP Project, is advancing a flowsheet to convert nickel intermediates via midstream processing to produce high-purity nickel and cobalt sulphates, two fundamental feedstock materials for the electric vehicle supply chain.
During the quarter, Sherritt continued to advance engineering and process flowsheet development, to enhance and derisk the flowsheet which already yielded very positive results for metal recoveries and impurity removals. Sherritt also continued its external engagement with governments, potential customers and funding partners and advancing alignment on key commercial and project parameters including identifying optimal site locations by the year end.
A continuous solvent extraction ("SX") pilot commenced in October and this phase of engineering and process development work is expected to be completed by year end.
Power
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||
$ millions (33 ⅓% basis), except as otherwise noted | 2024 | 2023 | Change | 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 12.9 | $ | 11.9 | 8% | $ | 36.7 | $ | 33.1 | 11% |
Cost of sales | 10.9 | 5.7 | 91% | 24.2 | 15.6 | 55% | ||||
Earnings from operations | 0.4 | 5.6 | (93%) | 8.7 | 14.8 | (41%) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | 1.1 | 6.2 | (82%) | 10.5 | 16.6 | (37%) | ||||
CASH FLOW | ||||||||||
Cash (used) provided by continuing operations for operating activities (1) | $ | (8.6) | $ | 2.8 | (407%) | $ | (6.7) | $ | 9.5 | (171%) |
Free cash flow (1) | (8.9) | 2.2 | (505%) | (11.1) | 7.6 | (246%) | ||||
PRODUCTION AND SALES | ||||||||||
Electricity (GWh (2) ) | 230 | 190 | 21% | 645 | 520 | 24% | ||||
AVERAGE-REALIZED PRICE (1) | ||||||||||
Electricity ($/MWh (2) ) | $ | 51.85 | $ | 56.30 | (8%) | $ | 51.70 | $ | 57.23 | (10%) |
UNIT OPERATING COSTS (1) | ||||||||||
Electricity ($/MWh) | 44.95 | 27.06 | 66% | 35.26 | 27.07 | 30% | ||||
SPENDING ON CAPITAL (1) | ||||||||||
Sustaining | $ | (1.5) | $ | 0.6 | (350%) | $ | 2.6 | $ | 1.9 | 37% |
(1) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) | Gigawatt hours ("GWh"), Megawatt hours ("MWh"). |
Revenue for Q3 2024 was $12.9 million which is up 8% compared to Q3 2023 primarily due to higher production on better equipment availability.
Unit operating costs (1) for Q3 2024 were $44.95/MWh compared to $27.06/MWh in Q3 2023 reflecting the higher planned maintenance work on three gas turbines that began in the second quarter of 2024 and which has now been completed. In part, the maintenance was required to also bring online another gas turbine to process additional gas being received as a result of the new wells that Power brought into production. The maintenance work and related spend was successfully funded by Energas through the Moa Swap and was incorporated into Sherritt's 2024 Power division guidance which remains unchanged. With the maintenance work now complete, Sherritt expects higher equipment availability to translate into higher production and dividends to Sherritt.
As a key partner in supporting the Cuban government's plans to increase power production, Sherritt continues to work with its Cuban partners to increase gas supply for additional electricity production. During the third quarter, a new well was drilled and was put into production in early October. This key development marks the third new well going into production since the second quarter of 2023, contributing to the improved utilization rates in the Corporation's Power division, the significantly higher levels of electricity production and the increased levels of dividends in Canada expected going forward.
Power recognized a recovery in spending on capital (1) of $1.5 million in Q3 2024 on previously capitalized inventory amounts that were expensed in the period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024 spending on capital was $2.6 million, primarily driven by planned maintenance activities completed in the year. Sustaining spending on capital (1) to September 30, 2024 is in line with annual guidance.
Given its strong operating performance during 2024, Energas generated sufficient liquidity to distribute to Sherritt dividends in Canada of $0.9 million and $6.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively. Based on 2024 guidance estimates for production volumes, unit operating costs (1) and spending on capital (1) disclosed in the Outlook section of the MD&A, Sherritt continues to expect total dividends in Canada from Energas of approximately $10.0 million in 2024. Refer to the risks related to Sherritt's corporate structure in the Corporation's 2023 Annual Information Form for further information on risks related to dividends in Canada from Energas.
(1) | Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
OUTLOOK
2024 guidance for production volumes, unit operating costs and spending on capital remains unchanged.
CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST
Sherritt will hold its conference call and webcast October 31, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time to review its third quarter 2024 results. Dial-in and webcast details are as follows:
North American callers, please dial: | 1 (800) 717-1738 Passcode: 71533 | |||
International callers, please dial: | 1 (289) 514-5100 Passcode: 71533 | |||
Live webcast: |
Please dial in 15 minutes before the start of the call to secure a line. Alternatively, listeners can access the conference call and presentation via the webcast available on Sherritt's website.
An archive of the webcast and replay of the conference call will also be available on the website.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ("MD&A")
Sherritt's condensed consolidated financial statements and MD&A for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 are available at www.sherritt.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca . and should be read in conjunction with this news release. Financial and operating data can also be viewed in the investor relations section of Sherritt's website.
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
Management uses the following non-GAAP and other financial measures in this press release and other documents: combined revenue, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("adjusted EBITDA"), average-realized price, unit operating cost/net direct cash cost (NDCC), adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations, adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share, spending on capital, combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow.
Management uses these measures to monitor the financial performance of the Corporation and its operating divisions and believes these measures enable investors and analysts to compare the Corporation's financial performance with its competitors and/or evaluate the results of its underlying business. These measures are intended to provide additional information, not to replace International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") measures, and do not have a standard definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. As these measures do not have a standardized meaning, they may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other companies.
The non-GAAP and other financial measures are reconciled to their most directly comparable IFRS measures in the Appendix below.
ABOUT SHERRITT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Sherritt is a world leader in using hydrometallurgical processes to mine and refine nickel and cobalt – metals deemed critical for the energy transition. Sherritt's Moa Joint Venture has a current estimated mine life of 25 years and has embarked on an expansion program focused on increasing annual mixed sulphide precipitate production by approximately 20% of contained nickel and cobalt. The Corporation's Power division, through its ownership in Energas S.A., is the largest independent energy producer in Cuba with installed electrical generating capacity of 506 MW, representing approximately 10% of the national electrical generating capacity in Cuba. The Energas facilities are comprised of two combined cycle plants that produce low-cost electricity from one of the lowest carbon emitting sources of power in Cuba. Sherritt's common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "S".
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include such words as "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "forecast", "likely", "may", "will", "could", "should", "suspect", "outlook", "potential", "projected", "continue" or other similar words or phrases. Specifically, forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, statements regarding strategies, plans and estimated production amounts resulting from expansion of mining operations at the Moa Joint Venture; growing and increasing nickel and cobalt production; the Moa Joint Venture expansion program update as it relates to the Processing Plant; statements set out in the "Outlook" section of this press release; certain expectations regarding production volumes and increases, inventory levels, operating costs, capital spending and intensity; sales volumes; revenue, costs and earnings; the availability of additional gas supplies to be used for power generation; the amount and timing of dividend distributions from the Moa JV, including in the form of finished cobalt or cash under the Cobalt Swap, including management's efforts to maximize dividend distribution; the amount and timing of dividend distributions from Energas; growing shareholder value; expected annualized employee and other Corporate office-related cost savings; sufficiency of working capital management and capital project funding; strengthening the Corporation's capital structure and amounts of certain other commitments.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on current expectations, assumptions and projections about future events, including commodity and product prices and demand; the level of liquidity and access to funding; share price volatility; nickel, cobalt and fertilizer production results and realized prices; current and future demand products produced by Sherritt; global demand for electric vehicles and the anticipated corresponding demand for cobalt and nickel; revenues and net operating results; environmental risks and liabilities; compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations; advancements in environmental and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction technology; GHG emissions reduction goals and the anticipated timing of achieving such goals, if at all; statistics and metrics relating to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters which are based on assumptions or developing standards; environmental rehabilitation provisions; risks related to the U.S. government policy toward Cuba; current and future economic conditions in Cuba; the level of liquidity and access to funding; Sherritt share price volatility; and certain corporate objectives, goals and plans for 2024. By their nature, forward-looking statements require the Corporation to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. There is significant risk that predictions, forecasts, conclusions or projections will not prove to be accurate, that the assumptions may not be correct and that actual results may differ materially from such predictions, forecasts, conclusions or projections.
The Corporation cautions readers of this press release not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a number of factors could cause actual future results, conditions, actions or events to differ materially from the targets, expectations, estimates or intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, commodity risks related to the production and sale of nickel cobalt and fertilizers; security market fluctuations and price volatility; level of liquidity of Sherritt, including access to capital and financing; the ability of the Moa Joint Venture to pay dividends; the risk to Sherritt's entitlements to future distributions (including pursuant to the Cobalt Swap) from the Moa JV; risks related to Sherritt's operations in Cuba; risks related to the U.S. government policy toward Cuba, including the U.S. embargo on Cuba and the Helms-Burton legislation; political, economic and other risks of foreign operations, including the impact of geopolitical events on global prices for nickel, cobalt, fertilizers, or certain other commodities; uncertainty in the ability of the Corporation to enforce legal rights in foreign jurisdictions; uncertainty regarding the interpretation and/or application of the applicable laws in foreign jurisdictions; risk of future non-compliance with debt restrictions and covenants; risks related to environmental liabilities including liability for reclamation costs, tailings facility failures and toxic gas releases; compliance with applicable environment, health and safety legislation and other associated matters; risks associated with governmental regulations regarding climate change and greenhouse gas emissions; risks relating to community relations; maintaining social license to grow and operate; uncertainty about the pace of technological advancements required in relation to achieving ESG targets; risks to information technologies systems and cybersecurity; identification and management of growth opportunities; the ability to replace depleted mineral reserves; risks associated with the Corporation's joint venture partners; variability in production at Sherritt's operations in Cuba; risks associated with mining, processing and refining activities; risks associated with the operation of large projects generally; risks related to the accuracy of capital and operating cost estimates; the possibility of equipment and other failures; potential interruptions in transportation; uncertainty of gas supply for electrical generation; reliance on key personnel and skilled workers; growth opportunity risks; uncertainty of resources and reserve estimates; the potential for shortages of equipment and supplies, including diesel; supplies quality issues; risks related to the Corporation's corporate structure; foreign exchange and pricing risks; credit risks; competition in product markets; future market access; interest rate changes; risks in obtaining insurance; uncertainties in labour relations; legal contingencies; risks related to the Corporation's accounting policies; uncertainty in the ability of the Corporation to obtain government permits; failure to comply with, or changes to, applicable government regulations; bribery and corruption risks, including failure to comply with the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act or applicable local anti-corruption law; the ability to accomplish corporate objectives, goals and plans for 2024; and the ability to meet other factors listed from time to time in the Corporation's continuous disclosure documents.
The Corporation, together with its Moa Joint Venture, is pursuing a range of growth and expansion opportunities, including without limitation, process technology solutions, development projects, commercial implementation opportunities, life of mine extension opportunities and the conversion of mineral resources to reserves. In addition to the risks noted above, factors that could, alone or in combination, prevent the Corporation from successfully achieving these opportunities may include, without limitation: identifying suitable commercialization and other partners; successfully advancing discussions and successfully concluding applicable agreements with external parties and/or partners; successfully attracting required financing; successfully developing and proving technology required for the potential opportunity; successfully overcoming technical and technological challenges; successful environmental assessment and stakeholder engagement; successfully obtaining intellectual property protection; successfully completing test work and engineering studies, prefeasibility and feasibility studies, piloting, scaling from small scale to large scale production, procurement, construction, commissioning, ramp-up to commercial scale production and completion; and securing regulatory and government approvals. There can be no assurance that any opportunity will be successful, commercially viable, completed on time or on budget, or will generate any meaningful revenues, savings or earnings, as the case may be, for the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation will incur costs in pursuing any particular opportunity, which may be significant.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and should be considered in conjunction with the risk factors described in the Corporation's other documents filed with the Canadian securities authorities, including without limitation the "Managing Risk" section of the Management's Discussion and Analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated March 21, 2024 for the period ending December 31, 2023, which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca .
The Corporation may, from time to time, make oral forward-looking statements. The Corporation advises that the above paragraph and the risk factors described in this press release and in the Corporation's other documents filed with the Canadian securities authorities should be read for a description of certain factors that could cause the actual results of the Corporation to differ materially from those in the oral forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information and statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any oral or written forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information and statements contained herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
APPENDIX – NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
Management uses the measures below to monitor the financial performance of the Corporation and its operating divisions and believes these measures enable investors and analysts to compare the Corporation's financial performance with its competitors and/or evaluate the results of its underlying business. These measures are intended to provide additional information, not to replace IFRS measures, and do not have a standard definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. As these measures do not have a standardized meaning, they may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other companies.
The non-GAAP and other financial measures are reconciled to the most directly comparable IFRS measure as presented in the consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024.
Combined revenue
The Corporation uses combined revenue as a measure to help management assess the Corporation's financial performance across its core operations. Combined revenue includes the Corporation's consolidated revenue, less Oil and Gas revenue, and includes the revenue of the Moa JV within the Metals reportable segment on a 50% basis. Revenue of the Moa JV is included in share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture, net of tax, as a result of the equity method of accounting and excluded from the Corporation's consolidated revenue.
Revenue at Oil and Gas is excluded from Combined revenue as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its revenue relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and CUPET, which is not reflective of the Corporation's core operating activities or revenue generation potential. The exclusion of revenue at Oil and Gas from Combined revenue represented a change in the composition of Combined revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2023 to better reflect the Corporation's core operating activities and revenue generation potential and the prior year measure has been restated for comparative purposes.
Management uses this measure to reflect the Corporation's economic interest in its operations prior to the application of equity accounting to help allocate financial resources and provide investors with information that it believes is useful in understanding the scope of Sherritt's business, based on its economic interest, irrespective of the accounting treatment.
The table below reconciles combined revenue to revenue per the financial statements:
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||
$ millions | 2024 | 2023 | Change | 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||
Revenue by reportable segment | ||||||||||
Metals (1) | $ | 112.6 | $ | 115.7 | (3%) | $ | 378.3 | $ | 477.8 | (21%) |
Power | 12.9 | 11.9 | 8% | 36.7 | 33.1 | 11% | ||||
Corporate and Other | 0.9 | 0.4 | 125% | 2.3 | 1.5 | 53% | ||||
Combined revenue | $ | 126.4 | $ | 128.0 | (1%) | $ | 417.3 | $ | 512.4 | (19%) |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture | (96.9) | (96.0) | (318.9) | (334.5) | ||||||
Adjustment for Oil and Gas | 3.4 | 4.4 | 14.7 | 10.6 | ||||||
Financial statement revenue | $ | 32.9 | $ | 36.4 | (10%) | $ | 113.1 | $ | 188.5 | (40%) |
(1) | Revenue of Metals for the three months ended September 30, 2024 is composed of revenue recognized by the Moa JV of $96.9 million (50% basis), which is equity-accounted and included in share of earnings of Moa JV, net of tax, coupled with revenue recognized by Fort Site of $14.7 million and Metals Marketing of $1.0 million, both of which are included in consolidated revenue (for the three months ended September 30, 2023 - $96.0 million, $8.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively). Revenue of Metals for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 is composed of revenue recognized by the Moa JV of $318.9 million (50% basis), coupled with revenue recognized by Fort Site of $55.5 million and Metals Marketing of $3.9 million (for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 - $334.5 million, $62.6 million and $80.7 million, respectively). |
Adjusted EBITDA
The Corporation defines Adjusted EBITDA as (loss) earnings from operations and joint venture, which excludes net finance expense, income tax expense and loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, as reported in the financial statements for the period, adjusted for: depletion, depreciation and amortization; impairment losses on non-current non-financial assets and investments; and gains or losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment of the Corporation and the Moa JV. The exclusion of impairment losses eliminates the non-cash impact of the losses.
Earnings/loss from operations at Oil and Gas (net of depletion, depreciation and amortization, if applicable) is deducted from/added back to Adjusted EBITDA as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its financial results relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and CUPET, and environmental rehabilitation costs for legacy assets, which are not reflective of the Corporation's core operating activities or cash generation potential. The adjustment for earnings/loss from operations at Oil and Gas (net of depletion, depreciation and amortization, if applicable) represented a change in the composition of Adjusted EBITDA during the three months ended December 31, 2023 to better reflect the Corporation's core operating activities and cash generation potential and the prior year measure has been restated for comparative purposes.
Management uses Adjusted EBITDA internally to evaluate the cash generation potential of Sherritt's operating divisions on a combined and segment basis as an indicator of ability to fund working capital needs, meet covenant obligations, service debt and fund capital expenditures, as well as provide a level of comparability to similar entities. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors in evaluating the Corporation's operating results in the same manner as management and the Board of Directors.
The tables below reconcile (loss) earnings from operations and joint venture per the financial statements to Adjusted EBITDA:
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||
Metals (1) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations and joint venture | ||||||||||||
per financial statements | $ | 0.8 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 1.1 | $ | (5.7) | $ | 1.1 | $ | (2.3) |
Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 2.4 | 0.7 | - | 0.2 | - | 3.3 | ||||||
Oil and Gas earnings from operations, net of | ||||||||||||
depletion, depreciation and amortization | - | - | (1.1) | - | - | (1.1) | ||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 11.7 | - | - | - | - | 11.7 | ||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
Net finance expense | - | - | - | - | 1.4 | 1.4 | ||||||
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | (2.5) | (2.5) | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 14.9 | $ | 1.1 | $ | - | $ | (5.5) | $ | - | $ | 10.5 |
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2023 (Restated) | |||||||||||
Metals (1) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture | ||||||||||||
per financial statements | $ | (14.9) | $ | 5.6 | $ | (7.0) | $ | (7.9) | $ | 0.4 | $ | (23.8) |
Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | 3.2 | ||||||
Oil and Gas earnings from operations, net of | ||||||||||||
depletion, depreciation and amortization | - | - | 6.9 | - | - | 6.9 | ||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 10.4 | - | - | - | - | 10.4 | ||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | ||||||
Net finance income | - | - | - | - | (2.8) | (2.8) | ||||||
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (0.8) | $ | 6.2 | $ | - | $ | (7.6) | $ | - | $ | (2.2) |
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Metals (2) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Adjustment | Total | |||||||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture | ||||||||||||||
per financial statements | $ | (17.5) | $ | 8.7 | $ | 0.5 | $ | (19.6) | $ | 1.3 | $ | (26.6) | ||
Add: | ||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 7.7 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 | - | 10.3 | ||||||||
Oil and Gas loss from operations, net of | ||||||||||||||
depletion, depreciation and amortization | - | - | (0.6) | - | - | (0.6) | ||||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: | ||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 34.7 | - | - | - | - | 34.7 | ||||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | ||||||||
Net finance income | - | - | - | - | 0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||||
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | (1.6) | (1.6) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 25.4 | $ | 10.5 | $ | - | $ | (18.9) | $ | - | $ | 17.0 | ||
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2023 (Restated) | |||||||||||||
Metals (2) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Adjustment | Total | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations and joint venture | ||||||||||||||
per financial statements | $ | 19.9 | $ | 14.8 | $ | (6.9) | $ | (26.5) | $ | (1.3) | $ | - | ||
Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 7.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | - | 10.6 | ||||||||
Oil and Gas earnings from operations, net of | ||||||||||||||
depletion, depreciation and amortization | - | - | 6.7 | - | - | 6.7 | ||||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: | ||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 33.1 | - | - | - | - | 33.1 | ||||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | ||||||||
Net finance income | - | - | - | - | (2.4) | (2.4) | ||||||||
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | 3.7 | 3.7 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 62.3 | $ | 16.6 | $ | - | $ | (25.7) | $ | - | $ | 53.2 |
(1) | Adjusted EBITDA of Metals for the three months ended September 30, 2024 is composed of Adjusted EBITDA at Moa JV of $8.7 million (50% basis), Adjusted EBITDA at Fort Site of $6.6 million and Adjusted EBITDA at Metals Marketing of $(0.4) million (for the three months ended September 30, 2023 - $6.4 million, $(7.7) million and $0.5 million, respectively). |
(2) | Adjusted EBITDA of Metals for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 is composed of Adjusted EBITDA at Moa JV of $18.5 million (50% basis), Adjusted EBITDA at Fort Site of $8.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA at Metals Marketing of $(2.0) million (for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 - $72.2 million, $0.3 million and $(10.2) million, respectively). |
Average-realized price
Average-realized price is generally calculated by dividing revenue by sales volume for the given product in a given segment. The average-realized price for power excludes by-product and other revenue, as this revenue is not earned directly for power generation. Transactions by a Moa JV marketing company, included in other revenue, are excluded.
Management uses this measure, and believes investors use this measure, to compare the relationship between the revenue per unit and direct costs on a per unit basis in each reporting period for nickel, cobalt, fertilizer and power and provide comparability with other similar external operations.
Average-realized price for fertilizer is the weighted-average realized price of ammonia and various ammonium sulphate products.
Average-realized price for nickel and cobalt are expressed in Canadian dollars per pound sold, while fertilizer is expressed in Canadian dollars per tonne sold and electricity is expressed in Canadian dollars per megawatt hour sold.
The tables below reconcile revenue per the financial statements to average-realized price:
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the three months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Metals | ||||||||||||||
Nickel | Cobalt | Fertilizer | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||
Revenue per financial statements | $ | 78.8 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 13.6 | $ | 12.9 | $ | 13.0 | $ | (96.9) | $ | 32.9 |
Adjustments to revenue: | ||||||||||||||
By-product and other revenue | - | - | - | (1.0) | ||||||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation | 78.8 | 11.5 | 13.6 | 11.9 | ||||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 7.8 | 0.9 | 31.2 | 230 | ||||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Millions of | Thousands | Gigawatt | ||||||||||
pounds | pounds | of tonnes | hours | |||||||||||
Average-realized price (2)(3)(4) | $ | 10.11 | $ | 12.42 | $ | 434.58 | $ | 51.85 |
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the three months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Metals | ||||||||||||||
Nickel | Cobalt | Fertilizer | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||
Revenue per financial statements | $ | 78.6 | $ | 20.4 | $ | 8.3 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 13.2 | $ | (96.0) | $ | 36.4 |
Adjustments to revenue: | ||||||||||||||
By-product and other revenue | - | - | - | (1.2) | ||||||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation | 78.6 | 20.4 | 8.3 | 10.7 | ||||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 6.3 | 1.2 | 21.4 | 190 | ||||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Millions of | Thousands | Gigawatt | ||||||||||
pounds | pounds | of tonnes | hours | |||||||||||
Average-realized price (2)(3)(4) | $ | 12.54 | $ | 17.64 | $ | 389.43 | $ | 56.30 |
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Metals | ||||||||||||||
Nickel | Cobalt | Fertilizer | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||
Revenue per financial statements | $ | 260.6 | $ | 35.4 | $ | 58.3 | $ | 36.7 | $ | 41.0 | $ | (318.9) | $ | 113.1 |
Adjustments to revenue: | ||||||||||||||
By-product and other revenue | - | - | - | (3.4) | ||||||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation | 260.6 | 35.4 | 58.3 | 33.3 | ||||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 25.0 | 2.6 | 115.8 | 645 | ||||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Millions of | Thousands | Gigawatt | ||||||||||
pounds | pounds | of tonnes | hours | |||||||||||
Average-realized price (2)(3)(4) | $ | 10.41 | $ | 13.70 | $ | 503.33 | $ | 51.70 |
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
Metals | ||||||||||||||
Nickel | Cobalt | Fertilizer | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||
Revenue per financial statements | $ | 295.5 | $ | 89.6 | $ | 70.2 | $ | 33.1 | $ | 34.6 | $ | (334.5) | $ | 188.5 |
Adjustments to revenue: | ||||||||||||||
By-product and other revenue | - | - | - | (3.3) | ||||||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation | 295.5 | 89.6 | 70.2 | 29.8 | ||||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 20.7 | 5.2 | 114.7 | 520 | ||||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Millions of | Thousands | Gigawatt | ||||||||||
pounds | pounds | of tonnes | hours | |||||||||||
Average-realized price (2)(3)(4) | $ | 14.29 | $ | 17.51 | $ | 612.73 | $ | 57.23 |
(1) | Other revenue includes revenue from the Oil and Gas and Corporate and Other reportable segments. |
(2) | Average-realized price may not calculate exactly based on amounts presented due to foreign exchange and rounding. |
(3) | Power, average-realized price per MWh. |
(4) | Fertilizer, average-realized price per tonne. |
Unit operating cost/Net direct cash cost
With the exception of Metals, which uses NDCC, unit operating cost is generally calculated by dividing cost of sales as reported in the financial statements, less depreciation, depletion and amortization in cost of sales, the impact of impairment losses, gains and losses on disposal of property, plant, and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets and certain other non-production related costs, by the number of units sold.
Metals' NDCC is calculated by dividing cost of sales, as reported in the financial statements, adjusted for the following: depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment losses in cost of sales; cobalt by-product, fertilizer and other revenue; cobalt gain/loss; and other costs primarily related to the impact of opening and closing inventory values, by the number of finished nickel pounds sold in the period.
Unit operating costs for nickel and electricity are key measures that management and investors uses to monitor performance. NDCC of nickel is a widely-used performance measure for nickel producers. Management uses unit operating costs/NDCC to assess how well the Corporation's producing mine and power facilities are performing and to assess overall production efficiency and effectiveness internally across periods and compared to its competitors.
Unit operating cost (NDCC) for nickel is expressed in U.S. dollars per pound sold, while electricity is expressed in Canadian dollars per megawatt hour sold.
The tables below reconcile cost of sales per the financial statements to unit operating cost/NDCC:
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the three months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements | $ | 110.1 | $ | 10.9 | $ | 2.8 | $ | (98.4) | $ | 25.4 |
Less: | ||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales | (14.1) | (0.6) | ||||||||
96.0 | 10.3 | |||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: | ||||||||||
Cobalt by-product, fertilizer and other revenue | (33.8) | - | ||||||||
Impact of opening/closing inventory and other (2) | (6.3) | - | ||||||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation | 55.9 | 10.3 | ||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 7.8 | 230 | ||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Gigawatt | ||||||||
pounds | hours | |||||||||
Unit operating cost (3)(4) | $ | 7.17 | $ | 44.95 | ||||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC) (5) | $ | 5.16 |
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the three months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements | $ | 128.1 | $ | 5.7 | $ | 15.1 | $ | (98.9) | $ | 50.0 |
Less: | ||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales | (12.5) | (0.6) | ||||||||
115.6 | 5.1 | |||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: | ||||||||||
Cobalt by-product, fertilizer and other revenue | (37.1) | - | ||||||||
Cobalt gain | (0.3) | - | ||||||||
Impact of opening/closing inventory and other (2) | (18.2) | - | ||||||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation | 60.0 | 5.1 | ||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 6.3 | 190 | ||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Gigawatt | ||||||||
pounds | hours | |||||||||
Unit operating cost (3)(4) | $ | 9.56 | $ | 27.06 | ||||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC) (5) | $ | 7.24 |
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements | $ | 385.7 | $ | 24.2 | $ | 15.7 | $ | (330.9) | $ | 94.7 |
Less: | ||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales | (42.4) | (1.5) | ||||||||
343.3 | 22.7 | |||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: | ||||||||||
Cobalt by-product, fertilizer and other revenue | (117.7) | - | ||||||||
Impact of opening/closing inventory and other (2) | (17.8) | - | ||||||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation | 207.8 | 22.7 | ||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 25.0 | 645 | ||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Gigawatt | ||||||||
pounds | hours | |||||||||
Unit operating cost (3)(4) | $ | 8.30 | $ | 35.26 | ||||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC) (5) | $ | 6.10 |
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Adjustment | Total | ||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements | $ | 454.8 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 29.2 | $ | (294.2) | $ | 205.4 |
Less: | ||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales | (40.7) | (1.5) | ||||||||
414.1 | 14.1 | |||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: | ||||||||||
Cobalt by-product, fertilizer and other revenue | (182.3) | - | ||||||||
Cobalt gain | (2.7) | - | ||||||||
Impact of opening/closing inventory and other (2) | (35.3) | - | ||||||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation | 193.8 | 14.1 | ||||||||
Sales volume for the period | 20.7 | 520 | ||||||||
Volume units | Millions of | Gigawatt | ||||||||
pounds | hours | |||||||||
Unit operating cost (3)(4) | $ | 9.37 | $ | 27.07 | ||||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC) (5) | $ | 6.97 |
(1) | Other is composed of the cost of sales of the Oil and Gas and Corporate and Other reportable segments. |
(2) | Other is primarily composed of royalties and other contributions, sales discounts, effect of average exchange rate changes and other non-cash items. |
(3) | Unit operating cost/NDCC may not calculate exactly based on amounts presented due to foreign exchange and rounding. |
(4) | Power, unit operating cost price per MWh. |
(5) | Unit operating costs in US$ are converted at the average exchange rate for the period. |
Adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations and adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share
The Corporation defines adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations as net earnings/loss from continuing operations less items not reflective of the Corporation's current or future operational performance. These adjusting items include, but are not limited to, inventory write-downs/obsolescence, impairment of assets, gains and losses on the acquisition or disposal of assets, unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on financial assets and liabilities and other one-time adjustments that have not occurred in the past two years and are not expected to recur in the next two years. While some adjustments are recurring (such as unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss and revaluations of allowances for expected credit losses (ACL)), management believes that they do not reflect the Corporation's current or future operational performance.
Net earnings/loss from continuing operations at Oil and Gas is deducted from/added back to adjusted earnings/loss from continuing operations as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its financial results relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and CUPET, and environmental rehabilitation costs for legacy assets, which are not reflective of the Corporation's core operating activities or future operational performance. The adjustment for net earnings/loss from continuing operations at Oil and Gas represented a change in the composition of adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations during the three months ended December 31, 2023 to better reflect the Corporation's core operating activities and future operational performance and the prior year measure has been restated for comparative purposes.
Adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share is defined consistent with the definition above and divided by the Corporation's weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Management uses these measures internally and believes that they provide investors with performance measures with which to assess the Corporation's current or future operational performance by adjusting for items or transactions that are not reflective of its current or future operational performance.
The tables below reconcile net earnings (loss) from continuing operations and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share, both per the financial statements, to adjusted net loss from continuing operations and adjusted net loss from continuing operations per share, respectively:
2024 | 2023 | |||||||
For the three months ended September 30 | $ millions | $/share | $ millions | $/share | ||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 1.8 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (24.8) | $ | (0.06) |
Adjusting items: | ||||||||
Sherritt - Unrealized foreign exchange loss - continuing operations | 0.3 | - | (0.9) | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Gain on repurchase of notes | (1.1) | - | - | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Unrealized loss on nickel put options | 2.6 | 0.01 | - | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Realized gain on nickel put options | (3.4) | (0.01) | - | - | ||||
Metals - Moa JV - Impairment of property, plant and equipment | - | - | 1.5 | - | ||||
Metals - Moa JV - Inventory write-down/obsolescence | - | - | 1.6 | - | ||||
Metals - Fort Site - Inventory write-down | - | - | 7.3 | 0.02 | ||||
Metals - Metals Marketing - Cobalt gain | - | - | 0.3 | - | ||||
Power - Gain on revaluation of GNC receivable | (15.5) | (0.04) | (5.0) | (0.01) | ||||
Power - Loss on revaluation of Energas payable | 4.0 | 0.01 | 0.5 | - | ||||
Oil and Gas - Net (earnings) loss from continuing operations, net of | ||||||||
unrealized foreign exchange gain/loss | (1.1) | - | 7.0 | 0.02 | ||||
Total adjustments, before tax | $ | (14.2) | $ | (0.03) | $ | 12.3 | $ | 0.03 |
Tax adjustments | 0.9 | - | 0.4 | - | ||||
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations | $ | (11.5) | $ | (0.03) | $ | (12.1) | $ | (0.03) |
2024 | 2023 | |||||||
For the nine months ended September 30 | $ millions | $/share | $ millions | $/share | ||||
Net loss from continuing operations | $ | (50.6) | $ | (0.13) | $ | (10.9) | $ | (0.03) |
Adjusting items: | ||||||||
Sherritt - Unrealized foreign exchange loss - continuing operations | 0.3 | - | 0.2 | - | ||||
Sherritt's share - Severance related to restructuring | 3.5 | 0.01 | - | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Unrealized gain on nickel put options | (0.8) | - | - | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Realized gain on nickel put options | (3.4) | (0.01) | - | - | ||||
Corporate and Other - Gain on repurchase of notes | (1.8) | - | (3.5) | (0.01) | ||||
Metals - Moa JV - Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 0.5 | - | 1.5 | - | ||||
Metals - Moa JV - Inventory write-down/obsolescence | 2.5 | - | 3.0 | 0.01 | ||||
Metals - Fort Site - Inventory write-down | 0.9 | - | 8.1 | 0.02 | ||||
Metals - Metals Marketing - Inventory write-down | - | - | 1.1 | - | ||||
Metals - Metals Marketing - Cobalt gain | - | - | 2.7 | 0.01 | ||||
Power - Loss (gain) on revaluation of GNC receivable | 2.9 | 0.01 | (18.2) | (0.04) | ||||
Power - Loss on revaluation of Energas payable | - | - | 8.9 | 0.02 | ||||
Oil and Gas - Net (earnings) loss from continuing operations, net of | ||||||||
unrealized foreign exchange gain/loss | (0.7) | - | 5.9 | 0.02 | ||||
Total adjustments, before tax | $ | 3.9 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 9.7 | $ | 0.03 |
Tax adjustments | 0.6 | - | 0.4 | - | ||||
Adjusted net (loss) earnings from continuing operations | $ | (46.1) | $ | (0.12) | $ | (0.8) | $ | 0.00 |
Spending on capital
The Corporation defines spending on capital for each segment as property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures on a cash basis adjusted to the accrual basis in order to account for assets that are available for use by the Corporation and the Moa Joint Venture prior to payment and includes adjustments to accruals. The Metals segment's spending on capital includes the Fort Site's expenditures, plus the Corporation's 50% share of the Moa Joint Venture's expenditures, which is accounted for using the equity method for accounting purposes.
Combined spending on capital is the aggregate of each segment's spending on capital or the Corporation's consolidated property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures and the property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures of the Moa Joint Venture on a 50% basis, all adjusted to the accrual basis.
Combined spending on capital is used by management, and management believes this information is used by investors, to analyze the Corporation and the Moa Joint Venture's investments in non-current assets that are held for use in the production of nickel, cobalt, fertilizers, oil and gas and power generation.
The tables below reconcile property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures per the financial statements to combined spending on capital, expressed in Canadian dollars:
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Combined | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures (2) | $ | 10.6 | $ | 0.3 | $ | - | $ | 10.9 | $ | (9.8) | $ | 1.1 |
Intangible asset expenditures (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
10.6 | 0.3 | - | 10.9 | $ | (9.8) | $ | 1.1 | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Accrual adjustment | 0.6 | (1.8) | (0.1) | (1.3) | ||||||||
Spending on capital | $ | 11.2 | $ | (1.5) | $ | (0.1) | $ | 9.6 | ||||
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Combined | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures (2) | $ | 13.7 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 14.5 | $ | (7.6) | $ | 6.9 |
Intangible asset expenditures (2) | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | ||||||
13.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 14.6 | $ | (7.6) | $ | 7.0 | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Accrual adjustment | 2.0 | - | - | 2.0 | ||||||||
Spending on capital | $ | 15.7 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 16.6 | ||||
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Combined | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures (2) | $ | 27.8 | $ | 4.4 | $ | - | $ | 32.2 | $ | (25.8) | $ | 6.4 |
Intangible asset expenditures (2) | - | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | ||||||
27.8 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 32.4 | $ | (25.8) | $ | 6.6 | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Accrual adjustment | 0.6 | (1.8) | (0.2) | (1.4) | ||||||||
Spending on capital | $ | 28.4 | $ | 2.6 | $ | - | $ | 31.0 | ||||
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2023 | |||||||||||
Metals | Power | Other (1) | Combined | Adjustment | Total | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures (2) | $ | 39.4 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 41.5 | $ | (26.9) | $ | 14.6 |
Intangible asset expenditures (2) | - | - | 1.2 | 1.2 | - | 1.2 | ||||||
39.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 42.7 | $ | (26.9) | $ | 15.8 | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Accrual adjustment | 2.0 | - | (0.7) | 1.3 | ||||||||
Spending on capital | $ | 41.4 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 44.0 |
(1) | Includes property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures of the Oil and Gas and Corporate and Other reportable segments. |
(2) | Total property, plant and equipment expenditures and total intangible asset expenditures as presented in the Corporation's condensed consolidated statements of cash flow. |
Combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow
The Corporation defines cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities by segment as cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities for each segment calculated in accordance with IFRS and adjusted to remove the impact of cash provided (used) by wholly-owned subsidiaries. Combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities is the aggregate of each segment's cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities including the Corporation's 50% share of the Moa JV's cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting and excluded from consolidated cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities.
The Corporation defines free cash flow for each segment as cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities by segment, less cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including exploration and evaluation assets. Combined free cash flow is the aggregate of each segment's free cash flow or the Corporation's consolidated cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities, less consolidated cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including exploration and evaluation assets, less distributions received from Moa JV, plus cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities for the Corporation's 50% share of the Moa JV, less cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets for the Corporation's 50% share of the Moa JV.
The Corporate and Other segment's cash used by continuing operations for operating activities is adjusted to exclude distributions received from Moa JV. Distributions from the Moa JV excluded from Corporate and Other are included in the Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture to arrive at total cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities per the financial statements.
The Metals segment's free cash flow includes the Fort Site and Metals Marketing's free cash flow, plus the Corporation's 50% share of the Moa JV's free cash flow, which is accounted for using the equity method for accounting purposes.
Combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow are used by management, and management believes this information is used by investors, to analyze cash flows generated from operations and assess its operations' ability to provide cash or its use of cash, and in the case of combined free cash flow, after funding cash capital requirements, to service current and future working capital needs and service debt.
The tables below reconcile combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities to cash provided (used) by continuing operations per the financial statements to combined free cash flow:
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
Metals (1)(2) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Combined | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities | $ | 34.8 | $ | (8.6) | $ | (1.9) | $ | (3.2) | $ | 21.1 | $ | (0.7) | $ | 20.4 | ||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures | (10.6) | (0.3) | - | - | (10.9) | 9.8 | (1.1) | |||||||||
Intangible expenditures | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 24.2 | $ | (8.9) | $ | (1.9) | $ | (3.2) | $ | 10.2 | $ | 9.1 | $ | 19.3 |
$ millions, for the three months ended September 30 | 2023 (Restated) | |||||||||||||||
Metals (1)(2) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Combined | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities | $ | 10.7 | $ | 2.8 | $ | 2.6 | $ | (13.2) | $ | 2.9 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 4.4 | ||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures | (13.7) | (0.6) | (0.2) | - | (14.5) | 7.6 | (6.9) | |||||||||
Intangible expenditures | - | - | (0.1) | - | (0.1) | - | (0.1) | |||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | (3.0) | $ | 2.2 | $ | 2.3 | $ | (13.2) | $ | (11.7) | $ | 9.1 | $ | (2.6) |
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
Metals (3)(4) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Combined | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities | $ | 87.2 | $ | (6.7) | $ | (20.7) | $ | (28.4) | $ | 31.4 | $ | (35.8) | $ | (4.4) | ||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures | (27.8) | (4.4) | - | - | (32.2) | 25.8 | (6.4) | |||||||||
Intangible expenditures | - | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | |||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 59.4 | $ | (11.1) | $ | (20.9) | $ | (28.4) | $ | (1.0) | $ | (10.0) | $ | (11.0) |
$ millions, for the nine months ended September 30 | 2023 (Restated) | |||||||||||||||
Metals (3)(4) | Power | Oil and | Corporate | Combined | Adjustment | Total | ||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities | $ | 112.5 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 3.8 | $ | (59.9) | $ | 65.9 | $ | (19.6) | $ | 46.3 | ||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures | (39.4) | (1.9) | (0.2) | - | (41.5) | 26.9 | (14.6) | |||||||||
Intangible expenditures | - | - | (1.2) | - | (1.2) | - | (1.2) | |||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 73.1 | $ | 7.6 | $ | 2.4 | $ | (59.9) | $ | 23.2 | $ | 7.3 | $ | 30.5 |
(1) | Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $0.7 million, $35.9 million and $(1.8) million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (September 30, 2023 - $(1.8) million, $(12.2) million and $24.7 million, respectively). |
(2) | Property, plant and equipment expenditures and intangible expenditures for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $9.9 million, $0.7 million and nil, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2024 (September 30, 2023 - $7.5 million, $6.2 million and nil, respectively). |
(3) | Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $35.8 million, $47.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 (September 30, 2023 - $51.6 million, $(17.4) million and $78.3 million, respectively). |
(4) | Property, plant and equipment expenditures and intangible expenditures for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $25.9 million, $1.9 million and nil, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 (September 30, 2023 - $26.8 million, $12.6 million and nil, respectively). |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241029102650/en/
For further investor information contact:
Tom Halton
Director, Investor Relations and Corporate Affairs
Telephone: (416) 935-2451
Toll-free: 1 (800) 704-6698
E-mail: investor@sherritt.com
Sherritt International Corporation
Bay Adelaide Centre, East Tower
22 Adelaide St. West, Suite 4220
Toronto, ON M5H 4E3
www.sherritt.com
News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia
Latest News
Fortune Minerals Investor Kit
- Corporate info
- Insights
- Growth strategies
- Upcoming projects
GET YOUR FREE INVESTOR KIT
Latest Press Releases
Related News
TOP STOCKS
Investing News Network websites or approved third-party tools use cookies. Please refer to the cookie policy for collected data, privacy and GDPR compliance. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies.