Jupiter Energy’s cash-flow positive standing, substantial proven recoverable reserves and long-term strategic positioning in resource-rich Kazakhstan, make a compelling investment value proposition. Its commitment to sustainable operations, backed by its recent strategic investment in developing its 100 percent gas utilisation infrastructure, adds to the company’s investor appeal.
Jupiter Energy (ASX:JPR) is an established oil exploration and production company that operates three oilfields in Kazakhstan. The company has been producing approximately 600 to 700 barrels of oil per day from its licensed fields and has successfully navigated Kazakhstan’s regulatory and operational landscape since 2008. Its operations are fully compliant, with its three commercial production licenses secured until 2045/46/49. Jupiter Energy’s reserve base has been independently confirmed by a Sproule International competent person’s report (CPR), effective 31 December 2023, detailing significant recoverable reserves.
Jupiter Energy has a reputation as a reliable operator in the region. The company holds 100 percent ownership of its licenses, which cover a total area of approximately 123 sq km in the oil-rich Mangistau region. The license area is close to the port city of Aktau and strategically located in an area with established oil processing facilities and substantial oil and gas infrastructure, including pipelines to the country’s major oil refineries.
Jupiter has successfully transitioned its oilfields through the various regulatory phases required to reach full commercial production. Its three oilfields – Akkar East, Akkar North (East Block) and West Zhetybai – all operate under their respective 25-year full commercial licences. The company’s established compliance and operational framework underline its commitment to long-term sustainable production in Kazakhstan.
According to the Sproule International CPR, released in January 2024, Jupiter Energy’s recoverable reserves under the SPE/PRMS classification are as follows:
These figures confirm Jupiter’s substantial reserve base, with its Kazakh State Approved Reserves recorded at approximately 52 mmbbls (GOST C1 + C2 classification).
The company is also building the necessary pipelines to enable its current and future production wells to be connected into its larger neighbour’s existing gas utilisation infrastructure. This development will allow for the processing and utilisation of associated gas generated during oil production, not only complying with Kazakhstan’s legislation that is focussed on carbon-free operations but also benefiting the local community and contributing to Kazakhstan’s objective of reaching carbon neutrality over the coming decades. This project has seen close collaboration between Jupiter Energy, its larger oil producing neighbour and the Kazakh Ministry of Energy, thereby strengthening its relations with the Kazakh government and its people.
At the helm of Jupiter Energy is a highly experienced corporate and technical leadership team, driving the company towards achieving its goals and increasing shareholder value.
Block 31 is Jupiter Energy’s flagship project located in the Mangistau Basin of West Kazakhstan. Covering an area of approximately 123 sq km, it lies in a highly prospective region with proven oil reserves. The company acquired extensive 3D seismic data over the entire block and surrounding areas, totaling 235 sq km, which then enabled the identification of multiple drilling targets.
Jupiter has since drilled nine wells on Block 31, targeting the Akkar North (East Block), Akkar East, and West Zhetybai oilfields. The current production from Block 31 is approximately 640 barrels of oil per day, with plans to increase output to around 1,000 barrels per day with the drilling of a new well, with the spud data of this well expected in late November 2024. Further increases in production will come via the workovers of existing wells and the drilling of further new wells, planned from 2025 to 2030.
Block 31's strategic significance is bolstered by its newly constructed gas utilization infrastructure, which will allow for the processing and management of associated gas produced during oil production, ensuring this gas is 100 percent utilised by the company, its larger oil producing neighbour and/or by local communities. Kazakhstan has imposed stringent regulations against gas flaring, the practice of burning gas by-products that are generated during oil production. This means that 100 percent gas utilisation is a mandatory requirement for oil producers with full commercial licences in Kazakhstan.
Jupiter’s gas utilisation infrastructure, currently under construction, is expected to be approved for operation in November 2024. This will enable its oilfields to connect to a larger neighbouring producer’s existing gas utilisation facility, which will in turn process and manage the oilfields’ gas by-product. The strategic investment in gas utilisation infrastructure strengthens Jupiter’s relations with the local community and signifies its commitment to sustainable production and helping Kazakhstan reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades.
Geoff Gander graduated from the University of Western Australia in 1984, where he completed a Bachelor of Commerce degree. He has been involved in the listing and running of public companies since 1994. He was appointed as a director of Jupiter Energy in January 2005 and he is currently responsible for the overall operational leadership of the company, as well as investor relations and group corporate development.
Baltabek Kuandykov is currently the president of Meridian Petroleum, a privately held Kazakh oil & gas company. He was formerly the president of Nelson Resources, an oil development and production company operating in Kazakhstan which was listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange until its acquisition by Lukoil in 2005. Kuandykov has considerable experience in the oil and gas industry in the region, having served as president of Kazakhoil (predecessor of the Kazakh State oil company KazMunaiGas), and is a well-respected consultant to Chevron Overseas Petroleum on CIS projects. He also worked in a senior capacity for Kazneftegazrazvedka and was president of Kazakhstancaspishelf. Kuandykov has extensive government experience in Kazakhstan, having served as deputy minister of geology, head of the oil and gas directorate at the Ministry of Geology, and was deputy minister of energy and fuel resources.
Alexey Kruzhkov holds an engineering degree and an MBA with over 10 years’ experience working in the investment industry, focusing primarily on the oil & gas, mining and real estate sectors. He has served as a director on the boards of companies listed in Canada and Norway. He is a member of the executive team of Waterford Finance and Investment Limited. He holds British and Russian citizenships.
Alexander Kuzev is an oil industry professional with over 26 years of experience. Most of his career has been spent working in the Former Soviet Union with much of that time responsible for the overall management of field operations with a focus on production sustainability, technology and field maintenance. He brings an important technical advisory skill set to the Jupiter Energy board, as well as in-country experience, having been involved with various Kazakhstan-based oil and gas operations since the late 1990s.
Keith Martens has over 40 years’ experience as an oil finder and manager around the world. He has served as a technical advisor and consultant to a number of Australian oil & gas companies, and was instrumental in the discovery of Jupiter’s Akkar East and West Zhetybai oil fields when he was consulting to Jupiter Energy between 2007 and 2014. More recently, Martens has been working on the Eastern Margin of the Permian Basin in Texas with Winchester Energy and in the Paradox Basin in Utah and Colorado, as both lead explorationist and non-executive chairman of ASX listed Grand Gulf Energy (ASX:GGE).
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") announces that it has completed and tested 4 additional wells at its Two Rivers East Project including 3 Lower Montney Wells and 1 Upper Montney well on the 5-19 pad.
LOWER MONTNEY
The 3 new Lower Montney wells (F5-19, G5-19, H5-19) were drilled with an average horizontal length of 3,285 metres and completed with approximately 2.5 tons of sand per horizontal metre. The wells were placed on test for clean-up for an average of 7 days until a stabilized rate was achieved. The test rates noted below are based on the final 24 hours of each test.
The average rate achieved for the 3 new Lower Montney wells was 1,624 boepd per well comprised of 989 bbls per day of 41 API light sweet oil and 3.8 mmcf/d of liquids-rich gas. The rates per well are outlined in the table below:
| Well | Oil - bbls/d | Gas - mmcf/d | Total - boe/d | % Light Oil |
| F5-19 | 1,061 | 3.2 | 1,595 | 67 |
| G5-19 | 900 | 4.0 | 1,573 | 57 |
| H5-19 | 1,007 | 4.2 | 1,703 | 59 |
| Average | 989 | 3.8 | 1,624 | 61 |
The overall rates and more specifically the oil rates were materially higher than the previous 3 wells on the pad (C5-19, D5-19 and E5-19) that achieved an average test rate of 1,338 boepd including 729 bbls/d of light oil and 3.7 mmcf/d of gas (see press release dated January 18, 2024 for more information including per well test results and initial production rates). Although the 3 new Lower Montney wells were drilled with slightly longer lateral lengths and the completion design was slightly modified in an attempt to increase the overall oil production, the tests have exceeded expectations.
UPPER MONTNEY
The Upper Montney well (B5-19) was drilled with a horizontal length of 2,647 metres and completed with approximately 2.5 tons of sand per horizontal metre. The well flowed on cleanup for 6 days and achieved a rate of 1,136 boepd comprised of 271 bbls/d of 40 API light oil and 5.2 mmcf/d of liquids-rich gas. In comparison to the Lower Montney Wells noted above, the B5-19 was 20% shorter in horizontal length and had 42% less frac stages leaving room for future optimization.
Management is very pleased with the B5-19 test result particularly the potential impact on Coelacanth's development inventory over its 150-section contiguous Montney land block. The Upper Montney is extensively mapped over Coelacanth's lands, but the impact of this test is amplified given it is a 10-mile step-out from Coelacanth's Two Rivers West project and 5 miles from the nearest competitor well.
INFRASTRUCTURE & TAKEAWAY
As previously disclosed, Coelacanth has secured long-term takeaway and processing for up to 60 mmcf/d of gas and is in process of constructing the required facilities and pipelines to handle the 5-19 and subsequent pads. Initial testing and start-up of the facility is anticipated for late April 2025.
Overall, Coelacanth believes this was a very significant second step in its development that has materially expanded the development fairway of the Upper Montney as well as increased the productivity of the Lower Montney that was already established as productive.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
2110, 530 - 8th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: 403-705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
Oil and Gas Terms
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:
| Liquids | |
| Bbls | Barrels |
| Bbls/d | Barrels per day |
| NGLs | Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane) |
| Natural Gas | |
| Mcf | Thousands of cubic feet |
| Mcf/d | Thousands of cubic feet per day |
| MMcf/d | Millions of cubic feet per day |
| Oil Equivalent | |
| Boe | Barrels of oil equivalent |
| Boe/d | Barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Product Types
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:
Natural gas refers to shale gas
Oil refers to tight oil
NGLs refers to butane, propane and pentanes combined
Liquids refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent as described above.
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this document contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil, NGLs and natural gas production and capital programs. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities and the availability and cost of labor and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Test Results and Initial Production Rates
The B5-19 Upper Montney well was production tested for 6.3 days and produced at an average rate of 92 bbl/d oil and 2,100 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The F5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 4.9 days and produced at an average rate of 728 bbl/d oil and 1,607 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The G5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 7.1 days and produced at an average rate of 415 bbl/d oil and 1,489 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The H5-19 Basal Montney well was production tested for 8.1 days and produced at an average rate of 411 bbl/d oil and 1,166 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable and production was starting to decline.
A pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried out on these four wells and thus certain of the test results provided herein should be considered to be preliminary until such analysis or interpretation has been completed. Test results and initial production rates disclosed herein, particularly those short in duration, may not necessarily be indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/232259
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") is pleased to announce its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. All dollar figures are Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
| FINANCIAL RESULTS | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($000s, except per share amounts) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 2,362 | 679 | 248 | 9,192 | 2,459 | 274 | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow used in operating activities | (3,730 | ) | (2,553 | ) | 46 | (954 | ) | (3,830 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted (1) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | - | (-) | (0.01 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (1) | (207 | ) | (773 | ) | (73 | ) | 1,133 | (2,083 | ) | (154 | ) | |||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | (-) | (-) | - | - | (-) | - | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | (2,464 | ) | (1,869 | ) | 32 | (5,994 | ) | (5,823 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | (-) | (-) | - | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (1) | 15,760 | 31,176 | (49 | ) | 19,545 | 39,957 | (51 | ) | ||||||||||
| Adjusted working capital (1) | 47,264 | 23,516 | 101 | |||||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding (000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average - basic and diluted | 530,212 | 426,476 | 24 | 529,605 | 425,685 | 24 | ||||||||||||
| End of period - basic | 530,267 | 426,670 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
| End of period - fully diluted | 617,214 | 469,781 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING RESULTS (1) | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Daily production (2) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 221 | 39 | 467 | 268 | 46 | 483 | ||||||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 371 | 36 | 12 | 200 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 254 | 46 | 452 | 304 | 58 | 424 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 271 | 3,702 | 1,208 | 206 | ||||||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 829 | 201 | 313 | 921 | 259 | 256 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate ($/bbl) | 89.68 | 99.00 | (9 | ) | 90.88 | 93.73 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other NGLs ($/bbl) | 31.39 | 28.07 | 12 | 33.20 | 33.97 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 82.10 | 88.43 | (7 | ) | 84.00 | 81.69 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 1.41 | 3.60 | (61 | ) | 2.16 | 3.58 | (40 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 30.99 | 36.85 | (16 | ) | 36.41 | 34.83 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Royalties | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 15.52 | 20.08 | (23 | ) | 19.73 | 22.51 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.06 | 0.79 | (92 | ) | 0.23 | 0.82 | (72 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 5.02 | 8.26 | (39 | ) | 7.44 | 8.82 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 10.07 | 18.92 | (47 | ) | 10.10 | 17.68 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 1.68 | 3.17 | (47 | ) | 1.68 | 2.95 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 10.07 | 18.98 | (47 | ) | 10.10 | 17.68 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net transportation expenses (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 2.36 | 2.40 | (2 | ) | 2.30 | 1.86 | 24 | |||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.76 | 1.40 | (46 | ) | 0.72 | 1.36 | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 3.91 | 7.05 | (45 | ) | 3.65 | 6.76 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating netback (loss) (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 54.15 | 47.03 | 15 | 51.87 | 39.64 | 31 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | (1.09 | ) | (1.76 | ) | (38 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (1.55 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 11.99 | 2.56 | 368 | 15.22 | 1.57 | 869 | ||||||||||||
| Depletion and depreciation ($/boe) | (14.89 | ) | (21.33 | ) | (30 | ) | (14.71 | ) | (18.24 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses ($/boe) | (12.51 | ) | (47.09 | ) | (73 | ) | (13.90 | ) | (46.70 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||
| Share based compensation ($/boe) | (13.81 | ) | (34.70 | ) | (60 | ) | (12.72 | ) | (32.12 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||
| Finance expense ($/boe) | (2.71 | ) | (9.61 | ) | (72 | ) | (1.72 | ) | (5.27 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||
| Finance income ($/boe) | 9.54 | 37.32 | (74 | ) | 10.03 | 29.26 | (66 | ) | ||||||||||
| Unutilized transportation ($/boe) | (9.94 | ) | (28.44 | ) | (65 | ) | (5.96 | ) | (10.95 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||
| Net loss ($/boe) | (32.33 | ) | (101.29 | ) | (68 | ) | (23.76 | ) | (82.45 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
| (1) See "Oil and Gas Terms" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| (2) See "Product Types" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| (3) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selected financial and operational information outlined in this news release should be read in conjunction with Coelacanth's unaudited condensed interim financial statements and related Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, which are available for review under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com. | ||||||||||||||||||
OPERATIONS UPDATE
In Q3 2024, Coelacanth started the construction of its planned $80.0 million infrastructure project that includes over 35 kilometers of pipelines and a facility to handle current behind pipe volumes and future expansions. Ultimately the facility will be able to handle approximately 16,000 boe/d of which Coelacanth has approximately 4,400 boe/d tested but shut-in at the 5-19 Two Rivers East pad. The infrastructure is expected to be operational by mid-April 2025. Funding for this project is from cash on hand of approximately $64 million at the inception of the project plus up to $27.0 million from a mid-stream company that will fund the pipeline connection to its area gathering lines upon achievement of certain project milestones.
An additional four Montney wells are currently being completed and tested on the 5-19 pad which will add additional capacity to be brought on once the facility is operational. Debt financing of $52.0 million was secured subsequent to the quarter through two revolving bank credit facilities with $35.0 million currently being invested in the four new Montney wells noted plus a water disposal well.
Although the construction and start-up of the Two Rivers East project is a huge step in Coelacanth's development, we believe we are just scratching the surface on what the potential of this large Montney asset base may ultimately be able to perform.
We look forward to reporting updates on the Two Rivers East project in the upcoming quarters.
OIL AND GAS TERMS
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:
| Liquids | |
| Bbls | Barrels |
| Bbls/d | Barrels per day |
| NGLs | Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane) |
| Condensate | Pentane and heavier hydrocarbons |
| Natural Gas | |
| Mcf | Thousands of cubic feet |
| Mcf/d | Thousands of cubic feet per day |
| MMcf/d | Millions of cubic feet per day |
| MMbtu | Million of British thermal units |
| MMbtu/d | Million of British thermal units per day |
| Oil Equivalent | |
| Boe | Barrels of oil equivalent |
| Boe/d | Barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
This news release refers to certain measures that are not determined in accordance with IFRS (or "GAAP"). These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful than, financial measures that are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of the Company's performance. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP and other financial measures provides useful information to shareholders and investors in understanding and evaluating the Company's ongoing operating performance, and the measures provide increased transparency to better analyze the Company's performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted funds flow (used)
Management uses adjusted funds flow (used) to analyze performance and considers it a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's ability to generate the cash necessary to fund future capital investments and abandonment obligations and to repay debt, if any. Adjusted funds flow (used) is a non-GAAP financial measure and has been defined by the Company as cash flow from (used in) operating activities excluding the change in non-cash working capital related to operating activities, movements in restricted cash deposits and expenditures on decommissioning obligations. Management believes the timing of collection, payment or incurrence of these items involves a high degree of discretion and as such may not be useful for evaluating the Company's cash flows. Adjusted funds flow (used) is reconciled from cash flow from (used in) operating activities as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Cash flow used in operating activities | (3,730 | ) | (2,553 | ) | (954 | ) | (3,830 | ) | ||||
| Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
| Decommissioning expenditures | 790 | 925 | 1,266 | 1,677 | ||||||||
| Change in restricted cash deposits | 2,139 | - | 2,985 | (784 | ) | |||||||
| Change in non-cash working capital | 594 | 855 | (2,164 | ) | 854 | |||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (non-GAAP) | (207 | ) | (773 | ) | 1,133 | (2,083 | ) | |||||
Net transportation expenses
Management considers net transportation expenses an important measure as it demonstrates the cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses is calculated as transportation expenses less unutilized transportation and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Transportation expenses | 1,055 | 654 | 2,426 | 1,250 | ||||||||
| Unutilized transportation | (757 | ) | (525 | ) | (1,504 | ) | (773 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses (non-GAAP) | 298 | 129 | 922 | 477 | ||||||||
Operating netback
Management considers operating netback an important measure as it demonstrates its profitability relative to current commodity prices. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalties, operating expenses, and net transportation expenses and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 2,362 | 679 | 9,192 | 2,459 | ||||||||
| Royalties | (383 | ) | (152 | ) | (1,878 | ) | (623 | ) | ||||
| Operating expenses | (767 | ) | (350 | ) | (2,549 | ) | (1,249 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses | (298 | ) | (129 | ) | (922 | ) | (477 | ) | ||||
| Operating netback (non-GAAP) | 914 | 48 | 3,843 | 110 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures
Coelacanth utilizes capital expenditures as a measure of capital investment on property, plant, and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets and property acquisitions compared to its annual budgeted capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures - property, plant, and equipment | 396 | 15,785 | 973 | 22,344 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures - exploration and evaluation assets | 15,364 | 15,391 | 18,572 | 17,613 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures (non-GAAP) | 15,760 | 31,176 | 19,545 | 39,957 | ||||||||
Capital Management Measures
Adjusted working capital
Management uses adjusted working capital as a measure to assess the Company's financial position. Adjusted working capital is calculated as current assets and restricted cash deposits less current liabilities, excluding the current portion of decommissioning obligations.
| ($000s) | September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||
| Current assets | 49,905 | 87,616 | ||||
| Less: | ||||||
| Current liabilities | (14,235 | ) | (28,754 | ) | ||
| Working capital | 35,670 | 58,862 | ||||
| Add: | ||||||
| Restricted cash deposits | 10,001 | 6,784 | ||||
| Current portion of decommissioning obligations | 1,593 | 1,943 | ||||
| Adjusted working capital (Capital management measure) | 47,264 | 67,589 |
Non-GAAP Financial Ratios
Adjusted Funds Flow (Used) per Share
Adjusted funds flow (used) per share is a non-GAAP financial ratio, calculated using adjusted funds flow (used) and the same weighted average basic and diluted shares used in calculating net loss per share.
Net transportation expenses per boe
The Company utilizes net transportation expenses per boe to assess the per unit cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses per boe is calculated as net transportation expenses divided by total production for the applicable period.
Operating netback per boe
The Company utilizes operating netback per boe to assess the operating performance of its petroleum and natural gas assets on a per unit of production basis. Operating netback per boe is calculated as operating netback divided by total production for the applicable period.
Supplementary Financial Measures
The supplementary financial measures used in this news release (primarily average sales price per product type and certain per boe and per share figures) are either a per unit disclosure of a corresponding GAAP measure, or a component of a corresponding GAAP measure, presented in the financial statements. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a per unit basis are calculated by dividing the aggregate GAAP measure (or component thereof) by the applicable unit for the period. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a component basis of a corresponding GAAP measure are a granular representation of a financial statement line item and are determined in accordance with GAAP.
PRODUCT TYPES
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:
Natural gas refers to shale gas
Oil and condensate refers to condensate and tight oil combined
Other NGLs refers to butane, propane and ethane combined
Oil and NGLs refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent.
The following is a complete breakdown of sales volumes for applicable periods by specific product types of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| Sales Volumes by Product Type | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 33 | 4 | 36 | 6 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 36 | 12 | ||||||||
| NGLs (bbls/d) | 66 | 11 | 72 | 18 | ||||||||
| Tight oil (bbls/d) | 188 | 35 | 232 | 40 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 33 | 4 | 36 | 6 | ||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 221 | 39 | 268 | 46 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 36 | 12 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 254 | 46 | 304 | 58 | ||||||||
| Shale gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 3,702 | 1,208 | ||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 3,702 | 1,208 | ||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 829 | 201 | 921 | 259 | ||||||||
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil and condensate, other NGLs, and natural gas production, capital programs, and adjusted working capital. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities, and the availability and cost of labour and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs, and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty, and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Coelacanth is an oil and natural gas company, actively engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas reserves in northeastern British Columbia, Canada.
Further Information
For additional information, please contact:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
Suite 2110, 530 - 8th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: (403) 705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/230803
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia