
March 26, 2025
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. (CSE: SX) (OTC: SXOOF) (FSE: 85G1) announces that it has received preliminary results from surface sampling and early-stage mineralogical analysis on its Notre-Dame Critical Minerals Project, located within the Nitassinan, the traditional and ancestral territory, of the Innu First Nation of Mashteuiatsh in Québec. The results have confirmed the presence of niobium, tantalum, gallium and rare earths in multiple samples collected from a channel at surface and select drill intervals.
These results support the Company’s initial exploration hypothesis and reinforce the project's growing potential to host valuable technology and energy transition metals. The discovery stems from detailed earlier geochemical assays conducted over the past several months. The past and recent sampling reveal consistent anomalous values of niobium, tantalum, gallium and other rare earth minerals occur in multiple targets throughout the Notre-Dame Project. This new data confirms the presence of these critical elements in concentrations that warrant further investigation and support expanding exploration activities in the upcoming field season.
"These initial findings validate our ongoing efforts on the Notre-Dame Project and underscore the potential significance of this underexplored region," said Herb Duerr, CEO of St-Georges Eco-Mining. “(…) it is particularly encouraging to identify a carbonatite body that appears to extend at least 75 meters in length and up to 20 meters in width, based on limited early drilling. Even more significant is the surface mineralization, which can be traced consistently to depths ranging from 16 to 36 meters. Notably, every drill hole targeting the lens observed at surface successfully intersected the expected geological structure and encountered niobium mineralization at depth, with several intercepts over meaningful widths. Drilling has outlined 75 meters of strike along a shallow-dipping system that remains open at depth and begins virtually at surface (…)."
The company will initiate additional fieldwork this spring, including trenching, detailed mapping, and expanded sampling, to delineate mineralized zones and better understand the geological controls behind these critical metal occurrences. Further metallurgical testing will also be undertaken to assess the extractability of niobium, tantalum, gallium and the suite of rare earth minerals under the company’s eco-friendly approach.
The mapping, drilling, and sampling works carried out at the Notre-Dame Project in 2024 confirmed the presence of a carbonatite dike measuring 75 meters by 20 meters that is open in several directions and at depth, inside which anomalous REE, and Nb-Ta elements were found. Some analysis triggered the analysis overlimit threshold and will be sent to the labs for further analysis. The Company is providing the available preliminary results in the table below.
The Company’s surface sampling, taken from one channel of 8 meters at surface, yielded the following results with the lower number considered as a background value on the project:
Niobium (Nb) – from 100 to 2,360 ppm (143ppm to 3,376 ppm or 0.3376% of niobium pentoxide (Nb₂O₅)
Tantalum (Ta) – from 10 to 60 ppm
Gallium (Ga) – from 15 to 48 ppm
Total Rare Earth (TREEs) – from 200 to 4,000 ppm
The exploration drilling campaign yielded the following results in the table below on one of the targeted zones adjacent to the project access road. These values contained intervals of Nb that exceeded the assay detections limit of 2,500 ppm (in excess of 3,578ppm or 0.3578% of niobium pentoxide or Nb₂O₅)
Drill Hole # | From (m) | To (m) | Interval (m) | Nb ppm* | Ta ppm | Ga ppm | TREE ppm |
24-02 | 20.0 | 24.0 | 4.0 | >2,215** | 103.0 | 15 | 1,390 |
24-04 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 1.0 | 1,085 | 38.0 | 19 | 578 |
24-05 | 13.4 | 15.0 | 1.6 | 335 | 11.0 | 13 | 3,023 |
and | 15.0 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 845 | 22.0 | 15 | 1,008 |
24-06 | 13.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 470 | 18.0 | 9 | 1,320 |
and | 18.0 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 1,240 | 30.0 | 18 | 786 |
24-09 | 47.0 | 50.0 | 3.0 | >1,907** | 106.0 | 24 | 449 |
24-12 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 1,250 | 36.0 | 17 | 1,842 |
24-13 | 36.0 | 37.0 | 1.0 | 715 | 6.0 | 21 | 1,199 |
24-14 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1,405 | 35.4 | 18 | 1,069 |
Channel-1*** | 0.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 670 | 17.0 | 15 | 1,217 |
included | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2,124 | 39.2 | 25 | 1,615 |
* | Geochemistry done via Li Borate Fusion Method with ICP-MS finish (ALS, ME-MS81) | ||||||
** | Assay value of some samples is greater than 2500 ppm Nb (over limit) and results could increase or decrease after further analysis | ||||||
*** | Mineralization in channel sampling conducted at surface intersected the same carbonatite at depth via drilling |
DRILL HOLES | |||||||||
Hole Name | UTM-X* | UTM-Y | Elev | Az(°) | Dip (°) | Length | Qty | From | To |
NDL24-02 | 682578E | 5441883N | 224 | N225 | -45 | 81 | 24 | L273389 | L273412 |
NDL24-03 | 682578E | 5441883N | 224 | N225 | -70 | 48 | 26 | L273363 | L273388 |
NDL24-04 | 682578E | 5441883N | 224 | N265 | -45 | 78 | 22 | L273341 | L273362 |
NDL24-05 | 682578E | 5441883N | 224 | N265 | -70 | 51 | 26 | L273315 | L273340 |
NDL24-06 | 682578E | 5441883N | 224 | N290 | -45 | 87 | 21 | L273294 | L273314 |
NDL24-07 | 682598E | 5441843N | 218 | N215 | -45 | 60 | 25 | L273269 | L273293 |
NDL24-08 | 682598E | 5441843N | 218 | N310 | -45 | 150 | 30 | L273239 | L273268 |
NDL24-09 | 682551E | 5441882N | 219 | N60 | -45 | 54 | 51 | L273188 | L273238 |
NDL24-10 | 682551E | 5441882N | 219 | N60 | -60 | 30 | 0 | No sample taken | |
NDL24-11 | 682551E | 5441882N | 219 | N140 | -38 | 21 | 13 | L273175 | L273187 |
NDL24-12 | 682564E | 5441874N | 218 | N315 | -45 | 54 | 13 | L273162 | L273174 |
NDL24-13 | 682564E | 5441874N | 218 | N50 | -45 | 69 | 50 | L273112 | L273161 |
NDL24-14 | 682564E | 5441874N | 218 | N235 | -45 | 51 | 11 | L273101 | L273111 |
Quality Control
An 8-meter surface channel was cut directly above the mineralized carbonatite intersected in drilling. The channel was sampled at 1-meter intervals, with cuts 20 cm deep and 2 cm wide. Each sample was geo-referenced, described, tagged, sealed, and placed in identified transport bags. These were securely shipped to Magnor Exploration Inc.’s warehouse in Saguenay, Québec, and then forwarded to ALS Laboratories for analysis. No company-inserted standards, blanks, or duplicates were included. Instead, ALS Laboratories added certified reference materials (OREAS L11, OREAS 232b, and OREAS 243), blanks, and duplicates upon receipt. Results were verified by an ALS geochemist.
All recovered drill core was stored in NQ-sized boxes, labeled, sealed, and securely stored before shipment to Magnor’s facility. The core was logged, measured, and geologically characterized. Selected intervals were tagged, split in half, sealed, and sent via secure transport to ALS Laboratories in Val-d'Or, Québec. Samples were crushed to 70% passing <2 mm, split by riffle splitter, then pulverized to 85% passing <75 µm. Geochemical assays were performed for 36 trace elements (including REEs) by lithium borate fusion with ICP-MS (ME-MS81). A separate analysis using four-acid digestion with ICP-MS was conducted for 60 trace elements, including lithium.
The technical information contained in this report has been reviewed by Jean-Paul Barrette Géo/ P.Geo, is is an independent project geologist and consultant. Mr. Barrette is a member of the Ordre des Géologues du Québec (OGQ, # 619). Mr. Barrette has sufficient experience (40 years) relevant to the style of mineralization and the type of deposit under study and the activity undertaken to qualify as a competent person as defined by NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. Barrette carried out several geological reconnaissance works in the Notre-Dame sector and recently made a of compilation of historical works.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
‘Herb Duerr’
HERB DUERR
President & CEO
About St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
St-Georges develops new technologies and holds a diversified portfolio of assets and patent-pending Intellectual Property within several highly prospective subsidiaries including: EVSX, a leading North American advanced battery processing and recycling initiative; St Georges Metallurgy, with metallurgical R&D and related IP, including processing and recovering high grade lithium from spodumene; Iceland Resources, with high grade gold exploration projects including the flagship Thor Project; H2SX, developing technology to convert methane into solid carbon and turquoise hydrogen; and Quebec exploration projects including the Manicouagan and Julie (CSM) projects on Quebec’s North Shore, and Notre-Dame niobium Project in Lac St Jean.
Visit the Company website at www.stgeorgesecomining.com
For general information: public@stgeorgesecomining.com
The Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE) has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or
the accuracy of the contents of this release.
SX:CNX
The Conversation (0)
24 July
Advances Halleck Creek Demonstration Plant-$15 placement
American Rare Earths Limited (ARR:AU) has announced Advances Halleck Creek Demonstration Plant-$15 placement
21 July
Resignation of Managing Director/CEO
18 July
Project Update - Optimisation Underway Halleck Creek
American Rare Earths Limited (ARR:AU) has announced Project Update - Optimisation Underway Halleck Creek
15 July
Lockheed Eyes Pacific Seabed Mining Boom
Defense manufacturer Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) is in early talks with undersea mining companies to open access to two dormant seabed exploration licenses it has held since the 1980s
The move signals a renewed US push to tap the ocean floor for critical minerals.
The licenses, which cover swaths of the eastern Pacific seabed in international waters, were awarded to Lockheed by US regulators decades ago during a previous wave of interest in deep-sea mining.
Though the projects never progressed to extraction, they are now gaining fresh attention as nations and corporations seek alternative sources of key minerals used in electric vehicles, defense technologies, and clean energy systems.
“We are in early stages of conversations with several companies about giving them access to our licences and allowing them to process those materials,” Frank St. John, Lockheed’s chief operating officer, told the Financial Times.
While St. John declined to quantify the potential value of the deposits, he added that interested parties have “done the homework and determined there is value there.”
Lockheed’s seabed licenses could represent a strategic foothold in a mineral-rich region, containing polymetallic nodules that can hold commercially viable concentrations of key metals.
The timing also coincides with recent executive action from the White House.
USPresident Donald Trump, who returned to office in January, signed an executive order in April asserting US rights to issue mining licenses in international waters and encouraging the stockpiling of seabed metals as strategic resources.
The order bypasses ongoing negotiations at the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the UN agency tasked with regulating deep-sea mining, and instead relies on the 1980 US Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act as the legal foundation.
It emphasizes the need to “establish the US as a global leader in seabed mineral exploration and development both within and beyond national jurisdiction.” While the US has not ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea — the treaty from which the ISA derives its authority — it has signed a 1994 agreement recognizing the treaty’s seabed provisions and operates its own permitting system through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Lockheed said it welcomes the renewed policy attention. “We believe the US has the opportunity to develop a gold standard for commercial recovery of nodules in an environmentally responsible manner.”
Court upholds TMC disclosures on deep-dea mining risks
Lockheed is not alone in navigating the legal uncertainties surrounding seabed mining.
The Metals Company (TMC) (NASDAQ:TMC), a deep-sea mining startup, recently survived a shareholder lawsuit alleging it had misled investors about the environmental impacts and financial backing of its operations.
US District Judge Eric Komitee dismissed the claims, ruling that the company’s comparisons to conventional mining methods were not misleading, even if deep-sea mining still carries environmental risks.
“It is eminently possible that (1) deep-sea mining causes meaningful environmental harm, and yet (2) such harm is significantly less than the harm caused by existing methods,” the judge wrote.
TMC had disclosed in filings that deep-sea mining could result in damage and that the regulatory path remained uncertain. Its legal win may encourage others — like Lockheed — to proceed more openly with their seabed plans, albeit cautiously.
Deep-sea mining industry cautiously awakens
The growing pursuit of potentially extracting resources from the world's oceans comes at a critical juncture for the seabed-mining industry. For decades, a de facto moratorium on mining in international waters has been in place due to regulatory uncertainty and environmental concerns.
The ISA has issued more than 30 exploratory permits, but has yet to finalize commercial extraction rules. That delay has prompted frustration from some parties, while drawing calls from others for a pause or outright ban.
Currently, the ISA is holding key assemblies in Jamaica to hash out the long-awaited mining code to regulate commercial activity on the ocean floor with provisions for environmental safeguards, royalties, and tax obligations.
But a growing number of countries — 37 at last count — have pushed for a precautionary pause, citing risks to deep-sea ecosystems that remain largely uncharted. Scientists warn that mining these habitats could cause irreversible damage.
In 2023, Lockheed appeared to step back from the sector by selling two UK-sponsored exploration licenses in the Pacific, a move interpreted by analysts as signaling reduced confidence in deep-sea mining.
However, its retained US licenses suggest it never fully exited the space.
The Trump administration’s executive order marks the most assertive US step yet to undermine the ISA’s multilateral approach, raising fears among diplomats that the agency may lose legitimacy.
China, which has also invested heavily in seabed mining, responded sharply to the move.
“The US authorization violates international law and harms the overall interests of the international community,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said earlier this year.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Keep reading...Show less
09 July
Plans, Policies, Partnerships: Austrade’s Paul Burfield on Australia's Critical Minerals Landscape
Australia is well positioned to support the near term development of diverse resilience and sustainable US global supply chains, according to Austrade Senior Trade and Investment Commissioner Paul Burfield.
“There are 600 Navy Resource Deposits and more than 350 operating mines across Australia with enormous potential to grow further as much of our country remains under explored,” he said at Fastmarkets’ Lithium Supply & Battery Raw Materials Conference in Las Vegas.
For his part, the commissioner talked about the current Australian resource landscape, highlighting critical minerals.
He also tackled Australia’s growing relationship with the US amidst trade tensions and how he sees the the countries’ partnership progressing.
Australia’s resource sector in a global lens
Burfield warned of vulnerabilities in today’s concentrated supply chains, with critical minerals production and refining largely dominated by a few countries.
The commissioner cited the current global mining industry, referring to how production and refining has been concentrated and “extremely vulnerable” to trade disruption.
He emphasised the risk of price manipulation, export restrictions and instability in markets like lithium, where China currently handles approximately 70 percent of refining.
Slide from Burfield highlighting Australia's vast resource potential.
Image via Georgia Williams.
Australia, he argued, offers a secure, transparent and progressive regulatory landscape.
Backed by world-class workforce expertise and technologies, Australia remains attractive to international partners seeking resilient, diversified sources of supply.
“It doesn't sound like much, but in a sector that is growing at 300 percent, a 10 percent reduction in dependence can be quite significant for this reason, and many others, international allies and like minded partners are increasingly looking to Australia as a reliable and secure supplier permits that they need to grow issues in the future.”
National strengths and industry momentum
The commissioner regarded Australia’s workforce and a deep venture, world class engineering, technology and support technology companies as essential contributors to its competitive advantage.
“In fact, you'll hear accents like mine and many that are much higher across the boardrooms of most of the world's mining and engineering companies,” he said.
According to him, Australia’s mining, engineering and technology sector contributes a quarter of a trillion dollars to its overall economy. These also employ over 1.1 million people in Australia.
Metals-wise, he said that the country plays a role in essential defense, advanced technology and energy security as the top producer of bauxite, lithium and rutile.
He added that Australia is among the top five producers of cobalt, manganese and rare earths like tasman, zircon and zinc.
A stable political system, a reliable and transparent regulatory environment, dependable contract legal environment, excellent environmental, social governance structures and supportive government policies, incentives and programs were also cited as Australia’s strengths, saying that it is among the most progressive countries in these aspects.
Government incentives and investments
“The Australian government (continues) to help develop strategically important critical minerals projects by providing targeted and proportionate support de-risk projects and help overcome distortions,” Burfield said.
He mentioned Australia’s critical minerals facility of about AU$4 billion, which he said is probably debt laden.
In April, the Albanese Government made a pledge of an initial investment of AU$1.2 billion in the reserve upon re-election, including through an AU$1 billion increase in the existing critical minerals facility.
“This will take our total investment in the Facility to $5 billion, providing vital support to private sector and international partners with the upfront capital costs of new projects,” the government said.
In addition to this and other financing options, Burfield cited the AU$7 billion critical minerals production tax incentive, which was passed on February 12.
The incentive will provide a refundable tax credit on 10 percent of eligible costs associated with the production of critical minerals and rare earths, aligning with Australia’s goal of developing its critical minerals sector.
Burfield also highlighted the National Reconstruction Fund, which was launched in September 2023.
“(This aims) to drive Australia's ambitions in advanced manufacturing, and has a billion dollar facility eligible for Australian minerals projects.”
Australia-US alliance
In the midst of his presentation, Burfield said that the intent to build a critical minerals reserve is Australia’s “own version of stock market,” similar to the US.
He said that in terms of a relationship with the US, Australia has already established ourselves as a trusted partner.
“This is demonstrated in several ways, particularly through the decision to consider Australia as a domestic source under Title Three of the Defensive Production Act (DPA), allowing Australian companies to be eligible for US government funding to support our manufacturing and industrial based capacities.”
In 2023, Australia was lined up as a “domestic source” under title three of the DPA, a change part of the broader Australia and US security partnership that aims to strengthen supply chains and industrial bases for both countries.
Australia currently produces 29 of the 50 minerals listed on the US critical minerals list, with the ability to supply up to 36.
Burfield said 49 projects have been identified as shovel-ready, pending private investment and off-take agreements. These projects are believed to “help fuel the growth of the US economy, its manufacturing sector and to drive new industries.”
“(Our collaboration (with the US) is built on these resilient, high quality, rural mineral supply chains and our close industry and government tasks,” he continued. “For over 100 years, (the collaboration stood side by side through war, peace and profound global change. So it goes without saying that Australia could commit a strategy which provides an enduring, long term policy framework to grow our critical middle sectors has been built to reflect our shared and mutual interests.”
Burfield assured the public that Australia and the US are working closely to strengthen supply chains to ensure that specific strategic projects get the support that they need.
Towards the end, he said that plans are in place to develop projects, including government awards, joint ventures and binding off takes. Both countries are expecting that these moves will play a crucial role in terms of supply chains for the defense and battery sectors and beyond.
“We’re really pleased to support these ambitions as a country and provide access to the resources that Australia needs to develop national prosperity and national security.”
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Australia for real-time news updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Gabrielle de la Cruz, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Keep reading...Show less
08 July
Strong Leach Recoveries and Low Impurities
Latest News
Latest Press Releases
Related News
TOP STOCKS
American Battery4.030.24
Aion Therapeutic0.10-0.01
Cybin Corp2.140.00