The Conversation (0)
dEInk8RUx9 Inc. (TSX: DYA) (OTCQX: DYFSF) (FRA: DMJ) (" dEInk8RUx9 " or the "Company") is pleased to announce that its HydraLytica
CoTec Holdings
Investor Insight
CoTec Holdings (CoTec) leverages disruptive technologies to undervalued critical mineral assets and waste materials into high-value commodities essential for a low-carbon future. By combining innovation with strategic execution, the company offers a unique investment opportunity, characterized by low cost, lower capex, faster cash flow generation, and superior returns.
Overview
CoTec (TSXV:CTH,OTCQB:CTHCF) applies innovative, disruptive technology to undervalued resource assets, aiming to create a portfolio of 20 to 30 modular “mini-mines” or processing facilities. By focusing on strategic minerals — such as rare earths, copper and iron ore — critical to advanced manufacturing, defense and electrification, the company transforms waste materials into valuable strategic commodities. This approach establishes the potential for high-margin revenue streams and positions CoTec for continued growth.
Through investments and efficient processing methods, CoTec targets areas like rare earth magnet recycling, green steel production and copper waste processing — sectors crucial to today’s evolving economies. For investors, this represents a straightforward opportunity to support a forward-thinking company poised for long-term appreciation.
CoTec is advancing four cutting-edge technologies and three strategic assets, with a medium-term goal of acquiring 10 technologies and 20 to 30 assets. The company’s business model is supported by partnerships, joint ventures (JVs), and a disciplined capital management strategy to unlock value across its portfolio.
CoTec is guided by a highly experienced management team and board of directors with deep expertise in mining, technology and corporate finance.
Why Invest in CoTec?
Investors looking for a high-potential opportunity with strong alignment to global trends in sustainability and technology will find CoTec an attractive choice. Here’s why:
- Significant Upside Potential: CoTec’s innovative approach to deploying cutting-edge, disruptive technologies across undervalued and waste assets creates a scalable business model. By targeting sectors of strategic importance such as rare earth magnet recycling, green steel production, and copper waste processing, CoTec aligns with critical global trends that ensure relevance and growth.
- Strategic Positioning: The company is well-positioned in sectors that are increasingly recognized as strategic priorities, with the application of rare earths and other critical minerals in artificial intelligence, renewable energy and defense.
- Experienced Leadership and Insider Confidence: With a leadership team boasting decades of experience in the resource sector and significant insider ownership (approximately 74 percent of the company is owned by management and insiders), CoTec’s leadership is deeply invested in the company’s success.
- Environmental Responsibility: CoTec’s focus on low-carbon resource extraction technologies not only aligns with global sustainability goals but also enables investors to generate financial returns while contributing to environmental stewardship.
- Catalysts for Growth: The company has a clear roadmap with multiple catalysts in the near term, which may include studies, expansions and potential funding announcements, which are expected to unlock further value for shareholders.*
Company Highlights
- CoTec deploys cutting-edge, low-carbon technologies to marginal assets, reclamation opportunities and recycling initiatives, transforming waste materials into strategic, high-value commodities.
- The company holds stakes in four groundbreaking technologies — HyProMag, Binding Solutions, MagIron and Ceibo. These technologies are designed to unlock significant value across strategically chosen assets. The Lac Jeannine iron project in Quebec, with an after tax NPV of US$59.9 million, stands on its own merits but could see further economic and environmental enhancements through the application of CoTec’s technologies. Similarly, HyProMag USA is pioneering the rollout of HyProMag’s rare earth recycling technology in the United States, delivering low-cost, magnet-to-magnet low-carbon resource recovery.
- CoTec accelerates the transition from discovery to production through proprietary technologies and strategic joint ventures, enabling significantly faster revenue generation compared to traditional mining operations.
- Backed by a management team with extensive expertise in mining, finance and technology, CoTec is uniquely positioned to drive innovation and growth in the critical minerals sector.
- Approximately 74 percent of the company is owned by management and insiders, demonstrating the leadership’s strong commitment to the company’s success.
Key Technologies and Assets
HyProMag USA Project
The HPMS process enables magnet-to-magnet short-loop recycling to produce a domestically-sourced recycled magnet with a very low CO2 footprint, bypassing the extensive chemical refining and reprocessing of traditional long-loop processes. HPMS uses 88 percent less energy, 85 percent less water and reduces CO2 by 85 percent. It eliminates complex separation stages, reduces material losses, and lowers operational risk. This streamlined approach is faster, more economical, and strategically critical for the U.S., ensuring self-sufficiency in AI, robotics, and defense, where reliance on Chinese rare earths poses a major geopolitical risk.
HyProMag USA, a US Government Minerals Security Partnership Project, leverages the Hydrogen Processing of Magnetic Scrap (HPMS) technology to recover NdFeB magnets from end-of-life electronics and industrial waste. This revolutionary hydrogen-based recycling process provides a much simpler, lower-risk, and more cost-effective alternative to conventional rare earth extraction, reducing reliance on traditional mining and imports. Over US$100 million was spent on R&D, developed by the University of Birmingham over 15 years.
A feasibility study released in November 2024, underscored the HyProMag USA project potential to become a game-changing domestic source of recycled rare earth magnets for the United States, targeting 10 percent of the country’s domestic demand for NdFeB magnets within five years of commissioning. CoTec, which owns 60.3 percent of HyProMag USA (50 percent through the US JV with Maginito, and CoTec’s 20.3 percent equity ownership in Maginito), is targeting a total annual production capacity of 1,041 tons of recycled NdFeB magnets over a 40-year operating life, post-tax net present value (NPV) of US$262 million at current market prices, increasing to US$503 million at independent forecast prices.
By tapping into the United States’ push for domestically sourced critical mineral resources, HyProMag USA will position itself as a pivotal player in reshaping the permanent magnet supply chain, providing investors with an opportunity to align with a project at the intersection of sustainability, innovation and economic growth.
Lac Jeannine Iron Project
Located in Quebec, the Lac Jeannine Project is an advanced-stage iron tailings project with a published Preliminary Economic Assessment( PEA - preliminary economic assessment). The project involves reprocessing approximately 73 million tonnes (Mt) of tailings to produce high-purity iron concentrate. The PEA incorporated the 2023 drill-program, providing an initial Inferred Mineral Resource of approximately 73 Mt at 6.7 percent total Fe for 4.9 Mt of contained total Fe. Though the PEA is based on an initial 10-year life of mine, estimates are the life of mine could be extended by as much as a further 10 years with further drilling and resource definition during the feasibility study in 2025. Based on open-pit extraction methods and the production of a gravity concentrate via conventional processing techniques and at a discount rate of 7 percent (based solely on an initial 10-year life of mine), the PEA indicated a pre-tax NPV of US$93.6 million, and an IRR of 38 percent, and an after tax NPV of US$59.5 million, and an IRR of 30 percent.
The Independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 for the Lac Jeannine Mineral Resource, Mr. Christian Beaulieu, P.Geo., is a member of l’Ordre des géologues du Québec (#1072). The Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical content relating to the Lac Jeannine Mineral Resource.
MagIron
MagIron focuses on restarting a brownfield iron ore concentrator in Minnesota to produce DR-grade iron concentrate for low-carbon steel production. The company is targeting production capacity of 2 to 3 Mt of concentrate annually with an operational life exceeding 20 years. MagIron is positioned to capitalize on the demand for U.S.-based green steel, with preliminary valuations showing significant uplift since CoTec’s initial investment. CoTec has a 16 percent equity interest in MagIron.
Binding Solutions (BSL)
BSL’s cold agglomeration technology converts mining waste into ISO-compliant pellets or briquettes, primarily for green steel production. This process is a game-changer in the industry, offering substantial reductions in energy use and emissions. CoTec’s equity in BSL has grown significantly in value, with the most recent valuation of the company exceeding US$158 million, a 107 percent increase from CoTec’s initial investment.Ceibo
Ceibo’s low-carbon, low-cost oxidative heap leaching technology enhances recovery rates for sulphide copper minerals such as chalcopyrite. The technology potentially improves copper recovery from 30 percent to 80 percent, making it a potential industry-leading solution for copper extraction. CoTec has a seat on Ceibo’s technical advisory board along with its minority equity interest, and is identifying copper assets where the technology could be applied in the form of a joint venture.
Management & Leadership
Julian Treger - CEO
With over three decades of experience in natural resources and finance, Julian Treger is the driving force behind CoTec’s innovative approach to resource extraction. Previously the CEO of Anglo Pacific Group, Treger successfully transitioned the company from a coal-focused royalty business to a battery-metals-focused streaming company, growing its income from £3 million in 2013 to nearly £62 million in 2021. Treger also brings significant expertise from his roles at Audley Capital and various board positions across the mining sector.
Lucio Genovese - Chairman
A seasoned executive with more than 30 years of experience in metals and mining, Lucio Genovese has held leadership roles at Glencore and is the CEO of Nage Capital Management in Switzerland. He is also chairman at Ferrexpo and a member of the board of directors of Mantos Copper S.A. and Nevada Copper. His deep industry knowledge and expertise in value creation through joint ventures and operational excellence are pivotal to CoTec’s success.
Tom Albanese
Tom Albanese served as chief executive officer of Rio Tinto from 2007 to 2013 and as chief executive officer and director of Vedanta Resources and Vedanta Limited from 2014 to 2017. He currently serves as lead independent director of Nevada Copper and non-executive director of Franco-Nevada, and was previously on the board of directors of Ivanhoe Mines, Palabora Mining Company and Turquoise Hill Resources. He holds a Master of Science degree in mining engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in mineral economics both from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Robert Harward - Non-executive Director
Robert Harward is a retired United States Navy vice admiral (SEAL) and a former deputy commander of the United States Central Command. He served on the US National Security Council in The White House and led several multi-national special forces commands in Afghanistan and Iraq. He joined Lockheed Martin in 2014 as their chief executive in the UAE and expanded his responsibilities to cover the Middle East, leaving to join Shield AI as executive vice-president for international business development and strategy based in the UAE.
Sharon Fay - Non-executive Director
A global investment industry leader with more than 35 years of experience, Sharon Fay has extensive expertise in corporate responsibility and strategic evaluation, making her instrumental in CoTec’s ESG initiatives and governance.
Margot Naudie - Non-executive Director
Magot Naudie is a seasoned capital markets professional with 25 years of experience as senior portfolio manager for North American and global natural resource portfolios. She has held senior roles at leading multi-billion-dollar asset management firms including TD Asset Management, Marret Asset Management and CPP Investment Board. Naudie is the president of Elephant Capital, and the co-founder of Abaxx Technologies. She sits on a number of public and private company boards. Naudie holds an MBA from Ivey Business School and a BA from McGill University. She is also a chartered financial analyst.
Erez Ichilov - Non-executive Director
With a background in mining, technology and project investments, Erez Ichilov has driven multiple ventures in battery materials, critical minerals and sustainable exploration, aligning well with CoTec’s strategic goals.
John Singleton - COO
John Singleton has more than 25 years of experience in the mining industry, including senior roles at Rio Tinto, De Beers Consolidated Mines and Centamin. His background in corporate development, strategy project evaluation, operations and project development equips CoTec with the expertise necessary for scaling its portfolio of assets and technologies. He is a Fellow of the Royal Geological Society and holds a BSc from the University of Bristol and a MSc in Engineering Geology from Imperial College London.
Abraham Jonker - CFO
Abraham Jonker brings 30 years of financial leadership in the mining industry, with a focus on corporate transactions, equity and debt financing, and strategic growth. He has played a pivotal role in raising over $750 million for mining ventures and has served on the boards of other prominent mining companies.
*Forward-Looking Statements
The information above regarding the Company and its investments which are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" which involve risks and uncertainties. Since forward- looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature, they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results in each case could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, including, but not limited to: resource and reserve risks; environmental risks and costs; labor costs and shortages; uncertain supply and price fluctuations in materials; increases in energy costs; labor disputes and work stoppages; leasing costs and the availability of equipment; heavy equipment demand and availability; contractor and subcontractor performance issues; worksite safety issues; project delays and cost overruns; extreme weather conditions; and social and transport disruptions. For further details regarding risks and uncertainties facing the Company, please refer to “Risk Factors” in the Company’s filing statement dated April 6, 2022, a copy of which may be found under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.com, and its other public filings. The Company assumes no responsibility to update forward- looking statements in this news release except as required by law. Readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release and are encouraged to read the Company’s continuous disclosure documents which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.
Troy Minerals Reports Analytical Results from Table Mountain Silica Project, Identifying Broad High-Purity Zones
Troy Minerals Inc. ("Troy" or the "Company") (CSE:TROY)(OTCQB:TROYF)(FSE:VJ3) is pleased to announce that it has received results from a sampling and mapping program on its 100% owned Table Mountain Silica Project, located near Golden, British Columbia, Canada.
Key Highlights
- Three distinct zones of high-purity silica mineralization identified within the Mount Wilson Quartzite Formation.
- 98.86% SiO₂ over a total of 62.11 metres of channel sampling in five channels at the main Table Mountain Zone.
- Outcrop sampling returned 98.18% to 99.74% SiO2 from 45 samples at Table Mountain Zone, 97.83% to 99.49% SiO₂ from 13 samples at South Zone, and 95.82% to 99.82% SiO₂ from 29 samples at Southeast Zone. *
- Very low deleterious elements identified in all samples.
President of Troy Minerals Inc., Yannis Tsitos commented: "These comprehensive maiden assay results validate the potential of Table Mountain as a key high-purity silica asset. Sampling confirmed the exceptional quality and consistency of silica mineralization across the Project. With grades reaching 98 to 99% SiO₂ across multiple zones of extensive outcrop exposure, and sampling ranging from 98.18% to 99.74% SiO₂ at the main Table Mountain Zone, we are rapidly advancing our understanding of this strategic asset. The Project's infrastructure advantages and proximity to existing silica operations further enhance its potential as we work to establish Troy as a significant player in the North American high-purity silica market, positioning the Company for long-term growth."
The sampling program consisted of both systematic grab samples and channel samples, with a total of 110 grab samples (107 outcrop and 3 float) taken within the property area and 70 channel samples collected from 62.11 metres within 74.16 metres of channels.
Figure 1. Index Map
Outcrop Sampling Results
Three main areas returned significant high-purity silica results: the Table Mountain Zone, located at the north end of the Property, the South Zone, and the Southeast Zone.
The most extensively sampled zone was the Table Mountain Zone, which returned an average grade of 98.90% SiO₂ from 45 grab samples (42 outcrop, 3 float), with values ranging from 98.18% to 99.74% SiO₂. Additionally, from these samples the following average values were returned: 0.31% Fe₂O₃, 0.01% CaO, 0.14% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, 0.01% TiO₂, 0.01% P₂O₅, and 14ppm boron. See Figure 2 and Table 1. *
Figure 2. Table Mountain Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 1. Table Mountain Zone Outcrop Samples
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
299516 | 509114 | 5685249 | 99.41 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.39 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
299517 | 509193 | 5685166 | 98.84 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 8 |
299518 | 509314 | 5685171 | 99.20 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 10 |
299519 | 509350 | 5685151 | 98.26 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 15 |
299520 | 509369 | 5685129 | 99.20 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.21 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 16 |
299521 | 509395 | 5685107 | 99.17 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 8 |
299522 | 509418 | 5685094 | 98.78 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 12 |
299523 | 509442 | 5685075 | 98.59 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.26 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 12 |
299524 | 509450 | 5685043 | 99.74 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 6 |
299525 | 509471 | 5685019 | 98.58 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299526 | 509482 | 5684990 | 99.25 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299527 | 509500 | 5684961 | 99.66 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299528 | 509515 | 5684938 | 99.21 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299529 | 509538 | 5684911 | 99.13 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299530 | 509561 | 5684862 | 98.18 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299531 | 509598 | 5684823 | 98.93 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299532 | 509583 | 5684759 | 98.99 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299533 | 509619 | 5684743 | 98.72 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 14 |
299534 | 509641 | 5684726 | 98.18 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 15 |
299535 | 509712 | 5684697 | 99.41 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299536 | 509736 | 5684685 | 99.27 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299537 | 509764 | 5684670 | 98.58 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 8 |
299548 | 509306 | 5685510 | 99.32 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 18 |
299560 | 509476 | 5685127 | 98.99 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 27 |
299561 | 509472 | 5685107 | 99.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299562 | 509457 | 5685115 | 98.74 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 28 |
299563 | 509439 | 5685112 | 98.35 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299564 | 509459 | 5685092 | 99.20 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.32 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299565 | 509487 | 5685107 | 99.49 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 28 |
299566 | 509490 | 5685083 | 98.48 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299567 | 509503 | 5685071 | 99.03 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 21 |
299568 | 509477 | 5685067 | 99.16 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299569 | 509478 | 5685044 | 98.68 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 20 |
299570 | 509506 | 5685041 | 98.46 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 29 |
299571 | 509523 | 5685054 | 98.81 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 22 |
299572 | 509382 | 5685160 | 98.42 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
299573 | 509397 | 5685160 | 98.92 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299574 | 509406 | 5685142 | 99.12 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 17 |
299575 | 509409 | 5685120 | 98.56 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.37 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 21 |
299581 | 509357 | 5685172 | 98.84 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.32 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 18 |
299582 | 509429 | 5685142 | 98.87 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 8 |
299583 | 509446 | 5685146 | 98.25 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 17 |
299584 | 509455 | 5685145 | 99.49 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.27 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 5 |
299585 | 509473 | 5685142 | 98.66 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
299586 | 509493 | 5685133 | 98.52 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <5 |
Note: 299548, 299584, and 299585 are float samples taken near outcrop.
The South Zone, comprising 13 high-grade quartzite outcrop grab samples averaged 98.80% SiO₂ with values ranging from 97.83% to 99.49% SiO₂. These samples averaged 0.28% Fe₂O₃, 0.13% CaO, 0.13% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, <0.01% TiO₂, 0.02% P₂O₅, and 6ppm boron. See Figure 3 and Table 2. *
Figure 3. South Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 2. South Zone Outcrop Samples
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
248351 | 511603 | 5682006 | 98.60 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 15 |
248352 | 511563 | 5681948 | 99.45 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248353 | 511552 | 5681948 | 99.01 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 9 |
248354 | 511551 | 5681951 | 99.09 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 6 |
248355 | 511530 | 5681940 | 98.74 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.23 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248356 | 511522 | 5681942 | 98.82 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.31 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <5 |
248357 | 511512 | 5681951 | 98.31 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 5 |
248358 | 511485 | 5681948 | 98.14 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 8 |
248359 | 511461 | 5681935 | 99.49 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 10 |
248360 | 511436 | 5681932 | 99.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 5 |
248361 | 511444 | 5681918 | 99.42 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248362 | 511440 | 5681942 | 97.83 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 8 |
248364 | 511374 | 5682002 | 98.43 | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.16 | <0.01 | <5 |
The Southeast Zone, comprising 29 high-grade quartzite outcrop grab samples, returned an average of 98.52% SiO₂ with values ranging from 95.82% to 99.82% SiO₂. Average values for other constituents were: 0.35% Fe₂O₃, 0.07% CaO, 0.30% Al₂O₃, 0.06% MgO, 0.02% TiO₂, <0.01% P₂O₅, and 26ppm boron. See Figure 4 and Table 3.*
Figure 4. Southeast Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 3. Southeast Zone Outcrop Samples - %SiO2
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
248384 | 513642 | 5680350 | 98.22 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 27 |
248385 | 513671 | 5680320 | 95.82 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 30 |
248386 | 513685 | 5680313 | 97.77 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 30 |
248387 | 513708 | 5680285 | 98.90 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 30 |
248388 | 513735 | 5680261 | 98.11 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 35 |
248389 | 513748 | 5680244 | 98.05 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 28 |
248390 | 513654 | 5680223 | 98.91 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 29 |
248391 | 513627 | 5680208 | 98.74 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 27 |
248392 | 513600 | 5680217 | 99.52 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
248393 | 513564 | 5680220 | 96.98 | 1.04 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 41 |
248394 | 513592 | 5680259 | 98.91 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 31 |
248395 | 513390 | 5680466 | 99.26 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 25 |
248396 | 513367 | 5680495 | 98.81 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 25 |
248397 | 513332 | 5680531 | 99.25 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
248398 | 513301 | 5680539 | 99.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
248399 | 513283 | 5680559 | 98.76 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.36 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 22 |
248400 | 513263 | 5680602 | 98.77 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 24 |
299501 | 513231 | 5680636 | 98.14 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299502 | 513188 | 5680660 | 99.05 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.27 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299503 | 513160 | 5680700 | 99.07 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299504 | 513133 | 5680705 | 98.85 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299508 | 513834 | 5679986 | 98.68 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299509 | 513876 | 5679941 | 98.88 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 34 |
299510 | 513904 | 5679907 | 99.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 11 |
299511 | 513968 | 5679864 | 99.82 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
299512 | 514023 | 5679832 | 99.21 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 10 |
299513 | 514070 | 5679980 | 97.08 | 1.11 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 18 |
299514 | 514081 | 5680011 | 96.66 | 1.27 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 26 |
299515 | 514075 | 5680039 | 98.58 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 14 |
The remainder of samples were either taken near the contacts of the adjacent units or from non-quartzite outcrops of the adjacent Glenogle shale (east contact) and Beaverfoot dolomite (west contact) and were not included in the statistical summary of the quartzite samples taken.
Channel Sampling Results
Channel sampling was conducted at the Table Mountain Zone, with results consistently similar to the outcrop sampling results. Sampling procedure consisted of continuous chip sampling along a 3-centimetre cut channel. Samples were taken continuously over 1-metre intervals perpendicular to the strike orientation of the outcrop, with the sample sequence starting from the southwest end of the channel. Intervals shorter than 20 centimetres were combined with the previous interval. 66 continuous chip channel samples were collected over 62.11 metres within 74.16 metres in five channels, returning a weighted average of 98.86% SiO₂.
Four additional duplicates were taken as QA/QC checks and passed validation. Sample density is sufficient to indicate the accurate representation of the underlying mineralization.
See Figure 5 and Table 4 below.
Figure 5. Channel Sampling Locations - Table Mountain Zone
Table 4. Table Mountain Zone - Channel Sampling
Channel | From (m) | To (m) | Interval (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
TM1 | 0.00 | 4.74 | 4.74 | 98.83 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 24 |
TM2 | 0.00 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 98.88 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 10 |
5.80 | 6.30 | 0.50 | Overburden | ||||||||
6.30 | 8.83 | 2.53 | 98.90 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 7 | |
8.83 | 9.38 | 0.55 | Overburden | ||||||||
9.38 | 13.0 | 3.62 | 99.21 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 11 | |
TM3 | 0.00 | 7.60 | 7.60 | 99.03 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 7 |
7.60 | 10.20 | 2.60 | Overburden | ||||||||
10.20 | 11.00 | 0.80 | 99.08 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6 | |
11.00 | 11.90 | 0.90 | Overburden | ||||||||
11.90 | 18.00 | 6.10 | 98.79 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 10 | |
TM4 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 5.22 | 99.09 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.33 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 12 |
TM5 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 98.82 | 0.15 | <0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 15 |
3.80 | 4.50 | 0.70 | Overburden | ||||||||
4.50 | 7.00 | 2.50 | 98.85 | 0.12 | <0.01 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 20 | |
7.00 | 10.20 | 3.20 | Overburden | ||||||||
10.20 | 12.00 | 1.80 | 98.77 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.34 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 12 | |
12.00 | 13.00 | 1.00 | Overburden | ||||||||
13.00 | 17.50 | 4.50 | 98.30 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 13 | |
17.50 | 20.10 | 2.60 | Overburden | ||||||||
20.10 | 33.20 | 13.10 | 98.81 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.31 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 9 |
Discussion
Sampling results within the zones were consistently high purity, with the northern Table Mountain Zone returning the best and most consistent grades. The favourable grades reflect field observations of a broad zone of white quartzite measuring at least 150 metres wide and a strike length extending from the Trans-Canada Highway to the south and to the north, beyond the northern end of the Property, representing a total strike length of at least 4 kilometres. Although the western cliff face of Table Mountain clearly demarcates the western margin of the Mount Wilson Formation quartzite, the eastern margin is obscured by a deep boulder field originating from the extensive, steep quartzite exposure in this area.
Channels sampling results demonstrated a consistency in grade over a wide area within the Table Mountain Zone.
All samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories in North Vancouver, British Columbia for B-MS82L (boron) and ME-XRF26 (all other elements). Four sample duplicates were taken in the channel sampling sequence, and passed QA/QC.
* Cautionary Note
The reader is cautioned that grab samples are selective by nature and may not represent the true grade or style of mineralization across the property.
About the Table Mountain Project
The Table Mountain Silica Project comprises 2,304 hectares located 4 kilometres east of Golden, B.C., with excellent year-round access and proximity to the Canadian Pacific Railway Golden Rail Yard. The property hosts up to 10 kilometers of regionally mapped strike length of the Mount Wilson Formation, with apparent widths ranging from 300 to 1,400 metres at surface. The project is strategically positioned near both the Moberly Silica Mine and Sinova Quartz silica quarry, which exhibit economic grade silica greater than 99.6% SiO₂ purity.
Qualified Person
Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Case Lewis, P.Geo., a "Qualified Person" as defined under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and a director of the Table Mountain Project vendor.
About Troy Minerals
Troy Minerals is a Canadian based publicly listed mining company focused on building shareholder value through acquisition, exploration, and development of strategically located "critical" mineral assets. Troy is aggressively advancing its projects within the silica (silicon), vanadium, and rare earths industries within regions that exhibit high and growing demand for such commodities, in both North America and Central-East Asia. The Company's primary objective is the near-term prospect of production with a vision of becoming a cash-flowing mining company to ultimately deliver tangible monetary value to shareholders, state, and local communities.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD,
Rana Vig | CEO & Director Telephone: 604-218-4766
Email: rana@ranavig.com
Forward-Looking Statements
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information: This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Troy Resources Inc. (the "Company") expects to occur, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "potential" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include results of exploration activities may not show quality and quantity necessary for further exploration or future exploitation of minerals deposits, volatility of commodity prices, and continued availability of capital and financing, permitting and other approvals, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.
The Canadian Securities Exchange has not reviewed this press release and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
Westport Fuel Systems: Advanced, Clean Fuel Systems that Deliver Economic, Environmental Benefits
Westport Fuel Systems (NASDAQ:WPRT,TSX:WPRT) delivers advanced fuel system technologies, focused on heavy-duty and light-duty vehicles, to reduce carbon emissions without compromising engine performance. The company offers innovative solutions that enable internal combustion engines to operate on alternative low-carbon fuels, including natural gas, renewable natural gas (RNG) and hydrogen.
Westport operates in a rapidly growing and changing clean transportation market driven by stringent emission regulations, increasing fuel costs, and rising demand for sustainable mobility solutions.
The HPDI system features a revolutionary, patented injector with a dual concentric needle design that delivers small quantities of diesel fuel and large quantities of natural gas, at high pressure, to the combustion chamber. The HPDI fuel system is engineered for heavy-duty trucks and industrial applications. By injecting high-pressure natural gas or hydrogen directly into the combustion chamber, HPDI delivers diesel-like torque and power with up to 98 percent lower CO₂ emissions when using hydrogen. This technology is critical for long-haul trucking and other high-load applications, where maintaining performance and range is essential. This technology is now owned under the Cespira JV, which generated a revenue of $16.2 million in Q3 2024.
Company Highlights
- Westport is a pioneer in the development and commercialization of alternative fuel delivery systems for natural gas, renewable natural gas (RNG), propane, and hydrogen-powered internal combustion engines (ICEs).
- The company is rooted in both the heavy-duty and light-duty vehicle market, leveraging Westport’s proprietary fuel technologies to deliver reductions in carbon emissions for both commercial and passenger vehicles.
- Westport’s High-Pressure Controls and Systems segment focuses on fuel management solutions for hydrogen and other pressurized alternative fuels.
- The flagship HPDI technology, now part of the company’s Cespira joint venture with Volvo Group, enables heavy-duty trucks to operate on natural gas or hydrogen, thereby substantially lowering CO₂ emissions while delivering diesel-equivalent or better performance.
- Westport’s growth trajectory is enhanced by key collaborations, most notably via the formation of Cespira, a joint venture with Volvo Group aimed at accelerating the global adoption of the HPDI technology.
This Westport Fuel Systems profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*
