Coelacanth Energy (TSXV:CEI) is a junior oil and natural gas exploration and development company exploring the prolific Montney region in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Coelacanth is strategically positioned to harness the potential of one of the most resource-rich natural gas basins in North America with a substantial landholding of approximately 150 net sections in the Two Rivers area of Montney.
The company is in the process of deploying $ 80 million to facilitate the smooth transition from exploration to production. Coelacanth’s financial health is further evidenced by its $64.4 million in working capital as of Q2 2024.
Coelacanth’s landholdings are strategically located in the Two Rivers area of Montney, giving it access to a highly productive portion of the basin. Unlike many junior exploration companies, Coelacanth is drill-ready, positioning it favorably among its peers. By securing significant infrastructure and landholdings, Coelacanth ensures its ability to tap into the natural gas and oil resources that lie beneath its properties, a key advantage in the competitive Montney region.
This Coelacanth Energy profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*
Click here to connect with Coelacanth Energy (TSXV:CEI) to receive an Investor Presentation
Coelacanth presents a compelling investment opportunity with its ownership of approximately 150 net sections in the Montney Formation in the Two Rivers oil and liquids rich natural gas region, boasting $64.4 million in working capital and a strategic position near major producers.
Coelacanth Energy (TSXV:CEI) is a junior oil and natural gas exploration and development company, focusing primarily on the prolific Montney region in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. With a substantial landholding of approximately 150 net sections in the Two Rivers area of Montney, Coelacanth is strategically positioned to harness the potential of one of the most resource-rich natural gas basins in North America. This company sets itself apart with its well-structured growth strategy, financial stability, and commitment to sustainability, making it one of the promising junior players in the region.
Coelacanth Energy has established a strong foundation to deliver on its future production targets by ensuring it is fully permitted and funded to embark on its infrastructure developments. The company is in the process of deploying $ 80 million to facilitate the smooth transition from exploration to production. Coelacanth’s financial health is further evidenced by its $64.4 million in working capital as of Q2 2024. This financial cushion not only supports ongoing infrastructure projects but also provides the company with the flexibility to expand its operations.
Capital deployed for project development will be allocated towards constructing processing facilities, pipelines, and necessary gathering lines, which are all crucial components for transporting and processing oil and gas. With processing contracts secured for up to 60 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) and long-term gas takeaway agreements for 100 mmcf/d, Coelacanth is well-positioned to scale its production quickly and efficiently. The company aims to have its infrastructure fully operational by mid April 2025, ramping up cashflow, marking a significant milestone in its transition to a full-scale production company.
The Montney Formation is recognized as one of the most significant natural gas reserves in North America, covering large portions of British Columbia and Alberta. Known for its high levels of natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs), Montney has attracted numerous large oil and gas producers, including companies like Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Shell, ARC Resources (ARX), Tourmaline Oil Corp (TOU), and ConocoPhillips (COP). The presence of such large players highlights the importance of this region in contributing to both the Canadian and global energy markets.
Coelacanth’s landholdings are strategically located in the Two Rivers area of Montney, giving it access to a highly productive portion of the basin. Unlike many junior exploration companies, Coelacanth is drill-ready, positioning it favorably among its peers. By securing significant infrastructure and landholdings, Coelacanth ensures its ability to tap into the natural gas and oil resources that lie beneath its properties, a key advantage in the competitive Montney region.
Coelacanth Energy Inc. has adopted a well-defined two-pronged strategy for growth, which focuses on both immediate production goals and long-term resource development. This approach provides a balanced focus on infrastructure development and resource delineation.
Coelacanth is focused on delineating its land base resources alongside infrastructure development. This involves drilling wells to explore and prove the extent of hydrocarbon deposits across multiple zones within the Montney Formation. By continuing to delineate its resources, the company aims to demonstrate the productivity and economic viability of its assets, which is critical for long-term growth. The delineation process also helps Coelacanth de-risk its projects, ensuring that future drilling activities are economically sound.
Compelling test results and initial reserves bookings
The Two Rivers East project is Coelacanth’s primary development focus. This area has shown significant potential for oil and gas production, with initial tests yielding compelling results. The proved and probable reserves (P+P) for Two Rivers East are estimated at 1,532 mboe per well, with approximately 30 percent of the reserves comprising oil and NGLs. Initial production tests from wells in the Lower Montney zone have confirmed the commerciality of this resource, with one well producing 1,345 barrels of oil equivalent per day at (boepd) at 61 percent oil, and three others producing an average of approximately 1,300 boepd at averaging 38 percent oil. These results underscore the viability of Two Rivers East as a key asset for Coelacanth’s future growth.
The Two Rivers West project also holds considerable proved and probable reserves of approximately 1,148 mboe, 34 percent of which consist of oil and NGLs. Similar to Two Rivers East, initial production tests have demonstrated strong deliverability. For example, the Upper Montney well in this region produced an average of 1,284 boepd during its test phase. These tests indicate that the Two Rivers West project will contribute significantly to Coelacanth’s production capabilities as it continues to expand its operations.
Coelacanth’s strategic location in the Montney, coupled with large contiguous landholdings and established infrastructure, positions the company for long-term growth. The company’s land position in the light oil window of Montney further enhances its value, as light oil typically commands a premium over heavier oil grades. Coelacanth is the number one landholder in this lucrative area, providing it with a significant competitive edge.
Moreover, Coelacanth’s management team has a proven track record, having successfully built and sold six oil and gas companies prior to founding Coelacanth. This experience adds credibility to the company’s long-term growth strategy, instilling confidence that Coelacanth can replicate its past successes in the Montney region.
Rob Zakresky has a significant background in the oil and gas sector, previously serving as the president and CEO of Leucrotta Exploration as well as five additional predecessor companies. He has been with Coelacanth Energy since its inception and is recognized for his strategic leadership and focus on enhancing shareholder value. His expertise in financial management and operations is reflected in his approach to driving the company's growth.
Bret Kimpton joined Coelacanth Energy in 2022, bringing a wealth of experience from his previous role as vice president of production at Storm Resources, where he contributed to significant production growth. He has a strong background in construction and operations, especially in the Montney region of British Columbia, managing various fields. His role at Coelacanth focuses on overseeing operational efficiency and implementing the company's growth strategies.
Nolan Chicoine has also been with Coelacanth Energy since its inception. His responsibilities encompass financial oversight, including financial planning, reporting, and analysis. He plays a crucial role in aligning the financial strategies with the company's operational goals. His background includes significant experience in financial management as CFO for Leucrotta Exploration, Crocotta Energy, and Chamaelo Energy.
Natural gas exploration and production in the prolific Montney region in British Columbia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") is pleased to announce its financial and operating results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2024. All dollar figures are Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
2024 HIGHLIGHTS
| FINANCIAL RESULTS | Three Months Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($000s, except per share amounts) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 4,544 | 4,204 | 8 | 13,736 | 6,663 | 106 | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow from (used in) operating activities | 3,157 | (404 | ) | (881 | ) | 2,203 | (4,234 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted (1) | 0.01 | (-) | (100 | ) | - | (0.01 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (1) | 382 | 1,750 | (78 | ) | 1,515 | (333 | ) | (555 | ) | |||||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | - | - | - | - | (-) | (-) | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | (2,903 | ) | (750 | ) | 287 | (8,897 | ) | (6,573 | ) | 35 | ||||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | (0.01 | ) | (-) | 100 | (0.02 | ) | (0.01 | ) | 100 | |||||||||
| Capital expenditures (1) | 64,952 | 34,656 | 87 | 84,497 | 74,613 | 13 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted working capital (deficiency) (1) | (18,637 | ) | 67,589 | (128 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding (000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average - basic and diluted | 530,398 | 478,731 | 11 | 529,804 | 439,055 | 21 | ||||||||||||
| End of period - basic | 530,670 | 528,650 | - | |||||||||||||||
| End of period - fully diluted | 615,930 | 609,989 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
(1) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section.
(2) See "Test Results and Initial Production Rates" section.
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING RESULTS (1) | December 31 | December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Daily production (2) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 473 | 419 | 13 | 320 | 139 | 130 | ||||||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 29 | 28 | 4 | 34 | 16 | 113 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 502 | 447 | 12 | 354 | 155 | 128 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,490 | 2,858 | 22 | 3,648 | 1,624 | 125 | ||||||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 1,084 | 923 | 17 | 962 | 426 | 126 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate ($/bbl) | 87.06 | 87.38 | (-) | 89.46 | 88.94 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Other NGLs ($/bbl) | 33.28 | 32.32 | 3 | 33.22 | 33.22 | - | ||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 83.97 | 83.88 | - | 83.99 | 83.28 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 2.07 | 2.86 | (28 | ) | 2.14 | 3.26 | (34 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 45.57 | 49.47 | (8 | ) | 39.01 | 42.82 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
| Royalties | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 16.86 | 19.38 | (13 | ) | 18.70 | 20.24 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.13 | 0.26 | (50 | ) | 0.21 | 0.57 | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 8.22 | 10.20 | (19 | ) | 7.66 | 9.57 | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 8.34 | 11.57 | (28 | ) | 9.47 | 13.25 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 1.25 | 1.28 | (2 | ) | 1.58 | 2.21 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 7.88 | 9.57 | (18 | ) | 9.47 | 13.25 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net transportation expenses (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 5.54 | 4.95 | 12 | 3.46 | 4.10 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.76 | 0.81 | (6 | ) | 0.73 | 1.12 | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 5.01 | 4.92 | 2 | 4.04 | 5.75 | (30 | ) | |||||||||||
| Operating netback (loss) (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 53.23 | 47.98 | 11 | 52.36 | 45.69 | 15 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | (0.07 | ) | 0.51 | (114 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.64 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 24.46 | 24.78 | (1 | ) | 17.84 | 14.25 | 25 | |||||||||||
| Depletion and depreciation ($/boe) | (10.76 | ) | (12.18 | ) | (12 | ) | (13.59 | ) | (14.93 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses ($/boe) | (15.46 | ) | (10.77 | ) | 44 | (14.34 | ) | (27.08 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||
| Share based compensation ($/boe) | (7.08 | ) | (16.31 | ) | (57 | ) | (11.12 | ) | (23.49 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||
| Loss on lease termination ($/boe) | (2.02 | ) | - | 100 | (0.57 | ) | - | 100 | ||||||||||
| Finance expense ($/boe) | (18.02 | ) | (1.28 | ) | 1,308 | (6.33 | ) | (3.09 | ) | 105 | ||||||||
| Finance income ($/boe) | 3.65 | 10.01 | (64 | ) | 8.23 | 18.75 | (56 | ) | ||||||||||
| Unutilized transportation ($/boe) | (3.88 | ) | (3.08 | ) | 26 | (5.37 | ) | (6.65 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||
| Net loss ($/boe) | (29.11 | ) | (8.83 | ) | 230 | (25.25 | ) | (42.24 | ) | (40 | ) | |||||||
(1) See "Oil and Gas Terms" section.
(2) See "Product Types" section.
(3) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section.
Selected financial and operational information outlined in this news release should be read in conjunction with Coelacanth's audited financial statements and related Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are available for review under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
OPERATIONS UPDATE
In Q4 2024, Coelacanth achieved two more significant milestones in its vision of moving the Two Rivers Montney Project from a large Montney land block to a proven resource with decades of inventory.
In 2022 and 2023, Coelacanth was able to prove productivity in the Lower Montney over a significant portion of lands at Two Rivers that allowed for the decision to build-out infrastructure and to continue pad drilling at Two Rivers East. During 2024, Coelacanth completed the licensing phase of the infrastructure and started construction while also continuing to develop the Montney resource.
In Q4 2024, Coelacanth was able to substantially complete all pipelines required for its 5-19 pad that connected it from the pad to the future facility and then on to a midstream gathering system. Concurrently, Coelacanth completed a successful Upper Montney well at Two Rivers East and changed the completion design in the Lower Montney on the 5-19 pad. The Upper Montney completion proved significant productivity (previously announced test rate of 1,136 boe/d) (1) in a zone that can be mapped over a significant portion of Coelacanth's lands and should materially increase drilling inventory. The new Lower Montney completions yielded increased overall test rates as well as increasing the oil percentage (3-well average test rates previously announced at 1,624 boe/d with 61% light oil) (1) pointing to potentially higher per-well recoveries of oil and gas and corresponding per-well values than previously estimated.
Construction of the facility continued throughout Q1 2025 and is now substantially complete. With 9 wells and over 11,000 boe/d (1) of test production waiting on completion of the facility, we anticipate yet another major milestone will be reached imminently. We look forward to reporting updates on the Two Rivers East project as new developments arise.
(1) See "Test Results and Initial Production Rates" section for more details.
OIL AND GAS TERMS
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:
| Liquids | |
| Bbls | Barrels |
| Bbls/d | Barrels per day |
| NGLs | Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane) |
| Condensat | Pentane and heavier hydrocarbons |
| Natural Gas | |
| Mcf | Thousands of cubic feet |
| Mcf/d | Thousands of cubic feet per day |
| MMcf/d | Millions of cubic feet per day |
| MMbtu | Million of British thermal units |
| MMbtu/d | Million of British thermal units per day |
| Oil Equivalent | |
| Boe | Barrels of oil equivalent |
| Boe/d | Barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
This news release refers to certain measures that are not determined in accordance with IFRS (or "GAAP"). These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful than, financial measures that are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of the Company's performance. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP and other financial measures provides useful information to shareholders and investors in understanding and evaluating the Company's ongoing operating performance, and the measures provide increased transparency to better analyze the Company's performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted funds flow (used)
Management uses adjusted funds flow (used) to analyze performance and considers it a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's ability to generate the cash necessary to fund future capital investments and abandonment obligations and to repay debt, if any. Adjusted funds flow (used) is a non-GAAP financial measure and has been defined by the Company as cash flow from (used in) operating activities excluding the change in non-cash working capital related to operating activities, movements in restricted cash deposits and expenditures on decommissioning obligations. Management believes the timing of collection, payment or incurrence of these items involves a high degree of discretion and as such may not be useful for evaluating the Company's cash flows. Adjusted funds flow (used) is reconciled from cash flow from (used) in operating activities as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Cash flow from (used in) operating activities | 3,157 | (404 | ) | 2,203 | (4,234 | ) | ||||||
| Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
| Decommissioning expenditures | 161 | 206 | 1,427 | 1,883 | ||||||||
| Change in restricted cash deposits | (5,361 | ) | - | (2,376 | ) | (784 | ) | |||||
| Change in non-cash working capital | 2,425 | 1,948 | 261 | 2,802 | ||||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (non-GAAP) | 382 | 1,750 | 1,515 | (333 | ) | |||||||
Net transportation expenses
Management considers net transportation expenses an important measure as it demonstrates the cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses is calculated as transportation expenses less unutilized transportation and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Transportation expenses | 887 | 680 | 3,313 | 1,930 | ||||||||
| Unutilized transportation | (387 | ) | (262 | ) | (1,891 | ) | (1,035 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses (non-GAAP) | 500 | 418 | 1,422 | 895 | ||||||||
Operating netback
Management considers operating netback an important measure as it demonstrates its profitability relative to current commodity prices. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalties, operating expenses, and net transportation expenses and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 4,544 | 4,204 | 13,736 | 6,663 | ||||||||
| Royalties | (820 | ) | (866 | ) | (2,698 | ) | (1,489 | ) | ||||
| Operating expenses | (786 | ) | (813 | ) | (3,335 | ) | (2,062 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses | (500 | ) | (418 | ) | (1,422 | ) | (895 | ) | ||||
| Operating netback (non-GAAP) | 2,438 | 2,107 | 6,281 | 2,217 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures
Coelacanth utilizes capital expenditures as a measure of capital investment on property, plant, and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets and property acquisitions compared to its annual budgeted capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures – property, plant, and equipment | 233 | 4,584 | 1,206 | 26,928 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures – exploration and evaluation assets | 64,719 | 30,072 | 83,291 | 47,685 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures (non-GAAP) | 64,952 | 34,656 | 84,497 | 74,613 | ||||||||
Capital Management Measures
Adjusted working capital (deficiency)
Management uses adjusted working capital (deficiency) as a measure to assess the Company's financial position. Adjusted working capital is calculated as current assets and restricted cash deposits less current liabilities, excluding the current portion of decommissioning obligations.
| ($000s) | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||
| Current assets | 11,579 | 87,616 | ||||
| Less: | ||||||
| Current liabilities | (37,234 | ) | (28,754 | ) | ||
| Working capital (deficiency) | (25,655 | ) | 58,862 | |||
| Add: | ||||||
| Restricted cash deposits | 4,900 | 6,784 | ||||
| Current portion of decommissioning obligations | 2,118 | 1,943 | ||||
| Adjusted working capital (deficiency) (Capital management measure) | (18,637 | ) | 67,589 |
Non-GAAP Financial Ratios
Adjusted Funds Flow (Used) per share
Adjusted funds flow (used) per share is a non-GAAP financial ratio, calculated using adjusted funds flow (used) and the same weighted average basic and diluted shares used in calculating net loss per share.
Net transportation expenses per boe
The Company utilizes net transportation expenses per boe to assess the per unit cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses per boe is calculated as net transportation expenses divided by total production for the applicable period.
Operating netback per boe
The Company utilizes operating netback per boe to assess the operating performance of its petroleum and natural gas assets on a per unit of production basis. Operating netback per boe is calculated as operating netback divided by total production for the applicable period.
Supplementary Financial Measures
The supplementary financial measures used in this news release (primarily average sales price per product type and certain per boe and per share figures) are either a per unit disclosure of a corresponding GAAP measure, or a component of a corresponding GAAP measure, presented in the financial statements. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a per unit basis are calculated by dividing the aggregate GAAP measure (or component thereof) by the applicable unit for the period. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a component basis of a corresponding GAAP measure are a granular representation of a financial statement line item and are determined in accordance with GAAP.
PRODUCT TYPES
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:
Natural gas refers to shale gas.
Oil and condensate refers to condensate and tight oil combined.
Other NGLs refers to butane, propane and ethane combined.
Oil and NGLs refers to tight oil and NGLs combined.
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent as described above.
The following is a complete breakdown of sales volumes for applicable periods by specific product types of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs:
| Three Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
| December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
| Sales Volumes by Product Type | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 22 | 12 | 32 | 7 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 29 | 28 | 35 | 16 | ||||||||
| NGLs (bbls/d) | 51 | 40 | 67 | 23 | ||||||||
| Tight oil (bbls/d) | 451 | 407 | 287 | 132 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 22 | 12 | 32 | 7 | ||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 473 | 419 | 319 | 139 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 29 | 28 | 35 | 16 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 502 | 447 | 354 | 155 | ||||||||
| Shale gas (mcf/d) | 3,490 | 2,858 | 3,648 | 1,624 | ||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,490 | 2,858 | 3,648 | 1,624 | ||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 1,084 | 923 | 962 | 426 | ||||||||
TEST RESULTS AND INITIAL PRODUCTION RATES
The 5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 9.4 days and produced at an average rate of 377 bbl/d oil and 2,202 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The A5-19 Basal Montney well was production tested for 5.9 days and produced at an average rate of 117 bbl/d oil and 630 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The B5-19 Upper Montney well was production tested for 6.3 days and produced at an average rate of 92 bbl/d oil and 2,100 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The C5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 5.8 days and produced at an average rate of 736 bbl/d oil and 2,660 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The D5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 12.6 days and produced at an average rate of 170 bbl/d oil and 580 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The E5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 11.4 days and produced at an average rate of 312 bbl/d oil and 890 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable, and production was starting to decline.
The F5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 4.9 days and produced at an average rate of 728 bbl/d oil and 1,607 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The G5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 7.1 days and produced at an average rate of 415 bbl/d oil and 1,489 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The H5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 8.1 days and produced at an average rate of 411 bbl/d oil and 1,166 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable and production was starting to decline.
A pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried out on these nine wells and thus certain of the test results provided herein should be considered to be preliminary until such analysis or interpretation has been completed. Test results and initial production rates disclosed herein, particularly those short in duration, may not necessarily be indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery.
Any references to peak rates, test rates, IP30, IP90, IP180 or initial production rates or declines are useful for confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates and declines are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will continue production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long-term performance or ultimate recovery. IP30 is defined as an average production rate over 30 consecutive days, IP90 is defined as an average production rate over 90 consecutive days and IP180 is defined as an average production rate over 180 consecutive days. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating aggregate production for the Company.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil and condensate, other NGLs, and natural gas production, capital programs, and adjusted working capital (deficiency). The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities, and the availability and cost of labour and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs, and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty, and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Coelacanth is an oil and natural gas company, actively engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas reserves in northeastern British Columbia, Canada.
Further Information
For additional information, please contact:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
Suite 2110, 530 - 8th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: (403) 705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/249584
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") is pleased to announce its 2024 year-end reserves as independently evaluated by GLJ Ltd. ("GLJ") effective December 31, 2024 (the "GLJ Report" or the "Report"), in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 ("NI 51-101") and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation ("COGE") Handbook. All dollar figures are Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
Introduction
During 2024, Coelacanth drilled an additional 3 Lower Montney wells on its 5-19 pad and started the construction of pipelines and facilities to allow for the production of all 9 wells on the 5-19 pad to come on production in Q2 2025. The 9 wells consist of 7 Lower Montney wells, 1 Upper Montney well and 1 Basal Montney well that have tested over 11,000 boe/d (flush production) (1). On completion of phase 1 of the facility in May 2025, Coelacanth will have capacity to produce 30.0 mmcf/d of gas plus the concurrent oil production for a combined capacity of approximately 7,500-8,000 boe/d. Phase 2 (adding compression) is scheduled for Q4 2025 and will double capacity.
Coelacanth almost doubled its reserves from 2023 while still only having recognized reserves on less than 10% of its 150 section Montney land block at Two Rivers. A total of 23 combined wells and locations are included in the Report comprised of 13 drilled and completed Montney wells plus 10 Montney undeveloped locations. The 13 existing wells include 8 Lower Montney wells, 4 Upper Montney wells, and 1 Basal Montney well. All 10 undeveloped locations booked were Lower Montney leaving potential to book additional Upper and Basal Montney wells on the same lands. Coelacanth believes it has been conservative in its bookings and, over time, will be able to expand the current reserve base to cover a greater portion of the land base.
The Report includes a total of $148.3 million of future development capital ("FDC") of which $33.5 million is in Jan-May of 2025 for phase 1 of the facility. By the end of May, the capital for phase 1 of the facility will have been spent and all of the proved developed non-producing and probable developed non-producing reserves will change to producing status. These adjustments will have a material effect on the Report given the FDC for phase 1 of the facility will be removed (thereby increasing the overall value) and the producing portion of the Report will increase dramatically with wells coming on production. Coelacanth is planning to engage GLJ to provide a mid-year update of the Report to better illustrate the magnitude of the changes.
Coelacanth's business plan for the Two Rivers Montney Project includes:
Coelacanth is currently:
Coelacanth is excited to initiate its business plan to systematically develop the property, establish the ultimate reserve recoveries and move the established recoverable resource from land to its established producing reserve base.
Reserve Highlights
Coelacanth is pleased to report material increases in both reserves and value:
Notes:
(1) See "Test Results and Initial Production Rates".
Reserves Summary
Coelacanth's December 31, 2024 reserves as prepared by GLJ effective December 31, 2024 and based on the GLJ (2025-01) future price forecast are as follows: (1,4)
| Working Interest Reserves (2) | Tight Oil (Mbbl) | Shale Natural Gas (Mmcf) | NGLs (Mbbl) | Total Oil Equivalent (Mboe) (3) |
| Proved | ||||
| Producing | 344 | 8,097 | 150 | 1,843 |
| Developed non-producing | 1,874 | 38,862 | 720 | 9,071 |
| Undeveloped | 1,137 | 27,324 | 506 | 6,197 |
| Total proved | 3,355 | 74,283 | 1,376 | 17,111 |
| Probable | 2,154 | 44,543 | 825 | 10,403 |
| Total proved & probable | 5,509 | 118,826 | 2,201 | 27,515 |
Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) "Working Interest" or "Gross" reserves means Coelacanth's working interest (operating and non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interest of Coelacanth.
(3) Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil.
(4) Disclosure of Net reserves are included in Company's Annual Information Form ("AIF") dated April 23, 2025 filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. "Net" reserves means Coelacanth's working interest (operated and non-operated) share after deduction of royalties, plus Coelacanth's royalty interest in reserves.
Reserves Values
The estimated future net revenues before taxes associated with Coelacanth's reserves effective December 31, 2024 and based on the GLJ (2025-01) future price forecast are summarized in the following table: (1,2,3,4)
| Discount factor per year | |||||
| ($000s) | 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% |
| Proved | |||||
| Producing | 21,615 | 17,655 | 14,827 | 12,765 | 11,220 |
| Developed non-producing | 131,346 | 97,179 | 74,105 | 57,825 | 45,878 |
| Undeveloped | 93,068 | 63,389 | 44,903 | 32,689 | 24,196 |
| Total proved | 246,030 | 178,224 | 133,834 | 103,279 | 81,294 |
| Probable | 221,362 | 147,285 | 105,806 | 80,431 | 63,701 |
| Total proved & probable | 467,391 | 325,509 | 239,640 | 183,710 | 144,995 |
Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) The estimated future net revenues are stated prior to provision for interest, debt service charges or general administrative expenses and after deduction of royalties, operating costs, estimated well abandonment and reclamation costs and estimated future capital expenditures.
(3) The estimated future net revenue contained in the table does not necessarily represent the fair market value of the reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast price and cost assumptions contained in the GLJ Report will be attained and variations could be material. The recovery and reserve estimates described herein are estimates only. Actual reserves may be greater or less than those calculated.
(4) The after-tax present values of future net revenue attributed to Coelacanth's reserves are included in Company's AIF dated April 23, 2025 filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Price Forecast
The GLJ (2025-01) price forecast is as follows:
| Year | WTI Oil @ Cushing ($US / Bbl) | Edmonton Light Oil ($Cdn / Bbl) | AECO Natural Gas ($Cdn / Mmbtu) | Chicago Natural Gas ($US / Mmbtu) | Foreign Exchange (Cdn$/US$) |
| 2025 | 71.25 | 91.33 | 2.05 | 2.79 | 0.7050 |
| 2026 | 73.50 | 93.32 | 3.00 | 3.70 | 0.7300 |
| 2027 | 76.00 | 96.45 | 3.50 | 4.01 | 0.7500 |
| 2028 | 78.53 | 99.82 | 4.00 | 4.10 | 0.7500 |
| 2029 | 80.10 | 101.80 | 4.08 | 4.18 | 0.7500 |
| 2030 | 81.70 | 103.84 | 4.16 | 4.27 | 0.7500 |
| 2031 | 83.34 | 105.92 | 4.24 | 4.35 | 0.7500 |
| 2032 | 85.00 | 108.04 | 4.33 | 4.45 | 0.7500 |
| 2033 | 86.70 | 110.20 | 4.41 | 4.54 | 0.7500 |
| 2034 | 88.44 | 112.40 | 4.50 | 4.63 | 0.7500 |
| Escalate thereafter (1) | 2.0% per year | 2.0% per year | 2.0% per year | 2.0% per year |
Note:
(1) Escalated at two per cent per year starting in 2034 in the January 1, 2025 GLJ price forecast with the exception of foreign exchange, which remains flat.
Reserve Life Index ("RLI")
Coelacanth's RLI presented below is based on estimated Q4 2024 average production of 1,084 boe per day.
| Reserve Category | RLI |
| Proved plus Probable Reserves | 69.0 |
| Proved Reserves | 42.9 |
Reserves Reconciliation
The following summary reconciliation of Coelacanth's working interest reserves compares changes in the Company's reserves as at December 31, 2024 to the reserves as at December 31, 2023 based on the GLJ (2025-01) future price forecast: (1,2)
| Total Proved | Tight Oil | Shale Natural Gas | NGLs | Total Oil Equivalent |
| (Mbbl) | (Mmcf) | (Mbbl) | (Mboe) (3) | |
| Opening balance | 2,291 | 44,784 | 720 | 10,475 |
| Discoveries | - | - | - | - |
| Extensions and improved recovery | 1,212 | 27,468 | 509 | 6,298 |
| Technical revisions | (28) | 3,663 | 173 | 756 |
| Acquisitions | - | - | - | - |
| Dispositions | - | - | - | - |
| Economic factors | (15) | (297) | (1) | (66) |
| Production | (105) | (1,335) | (24) | (352) |
| Closing balance | 3,355 | 74,283 | 1,376 | 17,111 |
| Proved plus Probable | Tight Oil | Shale Natural Gas | NGLs | Total Oil Equivalent |
| (Mbbl) | (Mmcf) | (Mbbl) | (Mboe) (3) | |
| Opening balance | 3,038 | 60,432 | 970 | 14,080 |
| Discoveries | - | - | - | - |
| Extensions and improved recovery | 2,599 | 56,330 | 1,043 | 13,031 |
| Technical revisions | (9) | 3,734 | 213 | 825 |
| Acquisitions | - | - | - | - |
| Dispositions | - | - | - | - |
| Economic factors | (13) | (334) | - | (69) |
| Production | (105) | (1,335) | (24) | (352) |
| Closing balance | 5,509 | 118,826 | 2,201 | 27,515 |
Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) "Working Interest" or "Gross" reserves means Coelacanth's working interest (operating and non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interest of Coelacanth.
(3) Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil.
Capital Expenditures
Capital allocation by category is as follows:
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
| Undeveloped land | 765 | 1,006 | 1,164 |
| Acquisitions | 765 | 1,006 | 1,164 |
| Drilling and completion | 38,353 | 61,274 | 9,009 |
| Facilities and related infrastructure | 44,935 | 12,094 | 3,689 |
| Geological, geophysical and other | 444 | 239 | 42 |
| Exploration and development expenditures | 83,732 | 73,607 | 12,740 |
| Total capital expenditures | 84,497 | 74,613 | 13,904 |
Finding and Development Costs ("F&D") and Finding, Development and Acquisition Costs ("FD&A")
Coelacanth has presented FD&A and F&D costs below:
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 3 Year Cumulative | |||||
| Proved & | Proved & | Proved & | Proved & | |||||
| ($000's, except where noted) | Proved | Probable | Proved | Probable | Proved | Probable | Proved | Probable |
| Exploration and development expenditures | 83,732 | 83,732 | 73,607 | 73,607 | 12,740 | 12,740 | 170,079 | 170,079 |
| Change in FDC (1) | (1,713) | 30,469 | 90,598 | 77,759 | 11,400 | 33,748 | 100,285 | 141,976 |
| F&D costs | 82,019 | 114,201 | 164,205 | 151,366 | 24,140 | 46,488 | 270,364 | 312,055 |
| Acquisitions | 765 | 765 | 1,006 | 1,006 | 1,164 | 1,164 | 2,935 | 2,935 |
| FD&A costs | 82,784 | 114,966 | 165,211 | 152,372 | 25,304 | 47,652 | 273,299 | 314,990 |
| Reserve Additions (Mboe) (2) | ||||||||
| Exploration and development | 6,989 | 13,789 | 8,637 | 9,784 | 1,169 | 3,400 | 16,795 | 26,973 |
| Acquisitions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6,989 | 13,789 | 8,637 | 9,784 | 1,169 | 3,400 | 16,795 | 26,973 | |
| F&D costs ($/boe) | 11.74 | 8.28 | 19.01 | 15.47 | 20.65 | 13.67 | 16.10 | 11.57 |
| FD&A costs ($/boe) | 11.84 | 8.34 | 19.13 | 15.57 | 21.65 | 14.02 | 16.27 | 11.68 |
Notes:
(1) Future development capital ("FDC") expenditures required to recover reserves estimated by GLJ. The aggregate of the exploration and development costs incurred in the most recent financial period and the change during that period in estimated future development costs generally may not reflect total finding and development costs related to reserve additions for that period.
(2) Sum of extensions and improved recovery, technical revisions and economic factors in the reserves reconciliation included above.
For Coelacanth's full NI 51-101 disclosure related to its 2024 year-end reserves please refer to the Company's AIF dated April 23, 2025 filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this document contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil, NGLs and natural gas production and reserves and reserves values, capital programs, and oil, NGLs, and natural gas commodity prices. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities and the availability and cost of labor and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Reserves Data
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of tight oil, shale gas, and NGLs reserves and the future cash flows attributed to such reserves. The reserve and associated cash flow information set forth above are estimates only. In general, estimates of economically recoverable tight oil, shale gas, and NGLs reserves and the future net cash flows therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as historical production from the properties, production rates, ultimate reserve recovery, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of oil and natural gas, royalty rates, the assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies and future operating costs, all of which may vary materially.
Individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves for all properties due to the effects of aggregation.
This news release contains estimates of the net present value of the Company's future net revenue from its reserves. Such amounts do not represent the fair market value of the Company's reserves.
The reserves data contained in this news release has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 ("NI 51-101"). The reserve data provided in this news release presents only a portion of the disclosure required under NI 51-101. All of the required information will be contained in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on the analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data; the use of established technology, and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Reserves are classified according to the degree of certainty associated with the estimates as follows:
Proved Reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
Probable Reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
Industry Metrics
This news release contains metrics commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry. Each of these metrics is determined by the Company as set out below or elsewhere in this news release. These metrics are "F&D costs", "FD&A costs", and "reserve-life index". These metrics do not have standardized meanings and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. As such, they should not be used to make comparisons.
Management uses these oil and gas metrics for its own performance measurements and to provide shareholders with measures to compare the Company's performance over time, however, such measures are not reliable indicators of the Company's future performance and future performance may not compare to the performance in previous periods.
"F&D costs" are calculated by dividing the sum of the total capital expenditures for the year (in dollars) by the change in reserves within the applicable reserves category (in boe). F&D costs, including FDC, includes all capital expenditures in the year as well as the change in FDC required to bring the reserves within the specified reserves category on production.
"FD&A costs" are calculated by dividing the sum of the total capital expenditures for the year inclusive of the net acquisition costs and disposition proceeds (in dollars) by the change in reserves within the applicable reserves category inclusive of changes due to acquisitions and dispositions (in boe). FD&A costs, including FDC, includes all capital expenditures in the year inclusive of the net acquisition costs and disposition proceeds as well as the change in FDC required to bring the reserves within the specified reserves category on production.
The Company uses F&D and FD&A as a measure of the efficiency of its overall capital program including the effect of acquisitions and dispositions. The aggregate of the exploration and development costs incurred in the most recent financial year and the change during that year in estimated future development costs generally will not reflect total finding and development costs related to reserves additions for that year.
"Reserve life index" or "RLI" is calculated by dividing the reserves (in boe) in the referenced category by the latest quarter of production (in boe) annualized. The Company uses this measure to determine how long the booked reserves will last at current production rates if no further reserves were added.
BOE Conversions
BOE's may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A BOE conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 Bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Abbreviations
| Bbl | barrel |
| Mbbl | thousands of barrels |
| MMbtu | millions of British thermal units |
| Mcf | thousand cubic feet |
| MMcf | million cubic feet |
| NGLs | natural gas liquids |
| BOE | barrel of oil equivalent |
| MBOE | thousands of barrels of oil equivalent |
| WTI | West Texas Intermediate at Cushing, Oklahoma |
Test Results and Initial Production Rates
The 5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 9.4 days and produced at an average rate of 377 bbl/d oil and 2,202 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The A5-19 Basal Montney well was production tested for 5.9 days and produced at an average rate of 117 bbl/d oil and 630 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The B5-19 Upper Montney well was production tested for 6.3 days and produced at an average rate of 92 bbl/d oil and 2,100 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The C5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 5.8 days and produced at an average rate of 736 bbl/d oil and 2,660 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The D5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 12.6 days and produced at an average rate of 170 bbl/d oil and 580 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The E5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 11.4 days and produced at an average rate of 312 bbl/d oil and 890 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable, and production was starting to decline.
The F5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 4.9 days and produced at an average rate of 728 bbl/d oil and 1,607 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The G5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 7.1 days and produced at an average rate of 415 bbl/d oil and 1,489 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The H5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 8.1 days and produced at an average rate of 411 bbl/d oil and 1,166 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable and production was starting to decline.
A pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried out on these nine wells and thus certain of the test results provided herein should be considered to be preliminary until such analysis or interpretation has been completed. Test results and initial production rates disclosed herein, particularly those short in duration, may not necessarily be indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery.
Any references to peak rates, test rates, IP30, IP90, IP180 or initial production rates or declines are useful for confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates and declines are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will continue production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long-term performance or ultimate recovery. IP30 is defined as an average production rate over 30 consecutive days, IP90 is defined as an average production rate over 90 consecutive days and IP180 is defined as an average production rate over 180 consecutive days. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating aggregate production for the Company.
For further information, please contact:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
2110, 530 - 8th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: (403) 705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Robert Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/249585
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") announces that its board of directors approved the granting of incentive stock options ("Options") under its stock option plan to acquire up to an aggregate of 3,877,378 common shares ("Common Shares") of the Corporation and the granting of restricted share units ("RSUs") under its restricted share unit plan to obtain up to an aggregate of 2,657,622 Common Shares to certain of its directors and officers. It has also approved the granting of 1,849,001 Options and 906,999 RSUs to certain of its employees and consultants.
All of the Options are exercisable for a period of five years at a price of $0.81 per Common Share and 33⅓% of the Options will vest on the date that is one year after the date of the grant of such Options and the remainder will vest 33⅓% per year thereafter. All of the RSUs are exercisable for a period of three years at no additional cost and 33⅓% of the RSUs will vest on the date that is one year after the date of the grant of such RSUs and the remainder will vest 33⅓% per year thereafter.
Following the grant of Options and RSUs, Coelacanth has an aggregate of 22,697,637 Options and 8,460,065 RSUs outstanding. Coelacanth's share based incentive plans limit the total number of Common Shares underlying the aggregate outstanding Options and RSUs to no more than 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of 531,352,966. As of the date of this press release, the total number of Common Shares underlying the outstanding Options and RSUs on an aggregate basis is 31,157,702 or approximately 5.86% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
2110, 530 - 8th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: 403-705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN TO U.S. NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/237872
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") announces that it has completed and tested 4 additional wells at its Two Rivers East Project including 3 Lower Montney Wells and 1 Upper Montney well on the 5-19 pad.
LOWER MONTNEY
The 3 new Lower Montney wells (F5-19, G5-19, H5-19) were drilled with an average horizontal length of 3,285 metres and completed with approximately 2.5 tons of sand per horizontal metre. The wells were placed on test for clean-up for an average of 7 days until a stabilized rate was achieved. The test rates noted below are based on the final 24 hours of each test.
The average rate achieved for the 3 new Lower Montney wells was 1,624 boepd per well comprised of 989 bbls per day of 41 API light sweet oil and 3.8 mmcf/d of liquids-rich gas. The rates per well are outlined in the table below:
| Well | Oil - bbls/d | Gas - mmcf/d | Total - boe/d | % Light Oil |
| F5-19 | 1,061 | 3.2 | 1,595 | 67 |
| G5-19 | 900 | 4.0 | 1,573 | 57 |
| H5-19 | 1,007 | 4.2 | 1,703 | 59 |
| Average | 989 | 3.8 | 1,624 | 61 |
The overall rates and more specifically the oil rates were materially higher than the previous 3 wells on the pad (C5-19, D5-19 and E5-19) that achieved an average test rate of 1,338 boepd including 729 bbls/d of light oil and 3.7 mmcf/d of gas (see press release dated January 18, 2024 for more information including per well test results and initial production rates). Although the 3 new Lower Montney wells were drilled with slightly longer lateral lengths and the completion design was slightly modified in an attempt to increase the overall oil production, the tests have exceeded expectations.
UPPER MONTNEY
The Upper Montney well (B5-19) was drilled with a horizontal length of 2,647 metres and completed with approximately 2.5 tons of sand per horizontal metre. The well flowed on cleanup for 6 days and achieved a rate of 1,136 boepd comprised of 271 bbls/d of 40 API light oil and 5.2 mmcf/d of liquids-rich gas. In comparison to the Lower Montney Wells noted above, the B5-19 was 20% shorter in horizontal length and had 42% less frac stages leaving room for future optimization.
Management is very pleased with the B5-19 test result particularly the potential impact on Coelacanth's development inventory over its 150-section contiguous Montney land block. The Upper Montney is extensively mapped over Coelacanth's lands, but the impact of this test is amplified given it is a 10-mile step-out from Coelacanth's Two Rivers West project and 5 miles from the nearest competitor well.
INFRASTRUCTURE & TAKEAWAY
As previously disclosed, Coelacanth has secured long-term takeaway and processing for up to 60 mmcf/d of gas and is in process of constructing the required facilities and pipelines to handle the 5-19 and subsequent pads. Initial testing and start-up of the facility is anticipated for late April 2025.
Overall, Coelacanth believes this was a very significant second step in its development that has materially expanded the development fairway of the Upper Montney as well as increased the productivity of the Lower Montney that was already established as productive.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
2110, 530 - 8th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: 403-705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
Oil and Gas Terms
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:
| Liquids | |
| Bbls | Barrels |
| Bbls/d | Barrels per day |
| NGLs | Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane) |
| Natural Gas | |
| Mcf | Thousands of cubic feet |
| Mcf/d | Thousands of cubic feet per day |
| MMcf/d | Millions of cubic feet per day |
| Oil Equivalent | |
| Boe | Barrels of oil equivalent |
| Boe/d | Barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Product Types
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:
Natural gas refers to shale gas
Oil refers to tight oil
NGLs refers to butane, propane and pentanes combined
Liquids refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent as described above.
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this document contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil, NGLs and natural gas production and capital programs. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities and the availability and cost of labor and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Test Results and Initial Production Rates
The B5-19 Upper Montney well was production tested for 6.3 days and produced at an average rate of 92 bbl/d oil and 2,100 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The F5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 4.9 days and produced at an average rate of 728 bbl/d oil and 1,607 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The G5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 7.1 days and produced at an average rate of 415 bbl/d oil and 1,489 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.
The H5-19 Basal Montney well was production tested for 8.1 days and produced at an average rate of 411 bbl/d oil and 1,166 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable and production was starting to decline.
A pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried out on these four wells and thus certain of the test results provided herein should be considered to be preliminary until such analysis or interpretation has been completed. Test results and initial production rates disclosed herein, particularly those short in duration, may not necessarily be indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/232259
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI) ("Coelacanth" or the "Company") is pleased to announce its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. All dollar figures are Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
| FINANCIAL RESULTS | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($000s, except per share amounts) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 2,362 | 679 | 248 | 9,192 | 2,459 | 274 | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow used in operating activities | (3,730 | ) | (2,553 | ) | 46 | (954 | ) | (3,830 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted (1) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | - | (-) | (0.01 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (1) | (207 | ) | (773 | ) | (73 | ) | 1,133 | (2,083 | ) | (154 | ) | |||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | (-) | (-) | - | - | (-) | - | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | (2,464 | ) | (1,869 | ) | 32 | (5,994 | ) | (5,823 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
| Per share - basic and diluted | (-) | (-) | - | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (1) | 15,760 | 31,176 | (49 | ) | 19,545 | 39,957 | (51 | ) | ||||||||||
| Adjusted working capital (1) | 47,264 | 23,516 | 101 | |||||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding (000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average - basic and diluted | 530,212 | 426,476 | 24 | 529,605 | 425,685 | 24 | ||||||||||||
| End of period - basic | 530,267 | 426,670 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
| End of period - fully diluted | 617,214 | 469,781 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING RESULTS (1) | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | % Change | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Daily production (2) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 221 | 39 | 467 | 268 | 46 | 483 | ||||||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 371 | 36 | 12 | 200 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 254 | 46 | 452 | 304 | 58 | 424 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 271 | 3,702 | 1,208 | 206 | ||||||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 829 | 201 | 313 | 921 | 259 | 256 | ||||||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and condensate ($/bbl) | 89.68 | 99.00 | (9 | ) | 90.88 | 93.73 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other NGLs ($/bbl) | 31.39 | 28.07 | 12 | 33.20 | 33.97 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 82.10 | 88.43 | (7 | ) | 84.00 | 81.69 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 1.41 | 3.60 | (61 | ) | 2.16 | 3.58 | (40 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 30.99 | 36.85 | (16 | ) | 36.41 | 34.83 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Royalties | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 15.52 | 20.08 | (23 | ) | 19.73 | 22.51 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.06 | 0.79 | (92 | ) | 0.23 | 0.82 | (72 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 5.02 | 8.26 | (39 | ) | 7.44 | 8.82 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 10.07 | 18.92 | (47 | ) | 10.10 | 17.68 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 1.68 | 3.17 | (47 | ) | 1.68 | 2.95 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 10.07 | 18.98 | (47 | ) | 10.10 | 17.68 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net transportation expenses (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 2.36 | 2.40 | (2 | ) | 2.30 | 1.86 | 24 | |||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | 0.76 | 1.40 | (46 | ) | 0.72 | 1.36 | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 3.91 | 7.05 | (45 | ) | 3.65 | 6.76 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating netback (loss) (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil and NGLs ($/bbl) | 54.15 | 47.03 | 15 | 51.87 | 39.64 | 31 | ||||||||||||
| Natural gas ($/mcf) | (1.09 | ) | (1.76 | ) | (38 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (1.55 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||
| Oil equivalent ($/boe) | 11.99 | 2.56 | 368 | 15.22 | 1.57 | 869 | ||||||||||||
| Depletion and depreciation ($/boe) | (14.89 | ) | (21.33 | ) | (30 | ) | (14.71 | ) | (18.24 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses ($/boe) | (12.51 | ) | (47.09 | ) | (73 | ) | (13.90 | ) | (46.70 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||
| Share based compensation ($/boe) | (13.81 | ) | (34.70 | ) | (60 | ) | (12.72 | ) | (32.12 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||
| Finance expense ($/boe) | (2.71 | ) | (9.61 | ) | (72 | ) | (1.72 | ) | (5.27 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||
| Finance income ($/boe) | 9.54 | 37.32 | (74 | ) | 10.03 | 29.26 | (66 | ) | ||||||||||
| Unutilized transportation ($/boe) | (9.94 | ) | (28.44 | ) | (65 | ) | (5.96 | ) | (10.95 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||
| Net loss ($/boe) | (32.33 | ) | (101.29 | ) | (68 | ) | (23.76 | ) | (82.45 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
| (1) See "Oil and Gas Terms" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| (2) See "Product Types" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| (3) See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selected financial and operational information outlined in this news release should be read in conjunction with Coelacanth's unaudited condensed interim financial statements and related Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, which are available for review under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com. | ||||||||||||||||||
OPERATIONS UPDATE
In Q3 2024, Coelacanth started the construction of its planned $80.0 million infrastructure project that includes over 35 kilometers of pipelines and a facility to handle current behind pipe volumes and future expansions. Ultimately the facility will be able to handle approximately 16,000 boe/d of which Coelacanth has approximately 4,400 boe/d tested but shut-in at the 5-19 Two Rivers East pad. The infrastructure is expected to be operational by mid-April 2025. Funding for this project is from cash on hand of approximately $64 million at the inception of the project plus up to $27.0 million from a mid-stream company that will fund the pipeline connection to its area gathering lines upon achievement of certain project milestones.
An additional four Montney wells are currently being completed and tested on the 5-19 pad which will add additional capacity to be brought on once the facility is operational. Debt financing of $52.0 million was secured subsequent to the quarter through two revolving bank credit facilities with $35.0 million currently being invested in the four new Montney wells noted plus a water disposal well.
Although the construction and start-up of the Two Rivers East project is a huge step in Coelacanth's development, we believe we are just scratching the surface on what the potential of this large Montney asset base may ultimately be able to perform.
We look forward to reporting updates on the Two Rivers East project in the upcoming quarters.
OIL AND GAS TERMS
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:
| Liquids | |
| Bbls | Barrels |
| Bbls/d | Barrels per day |
| NGLs | Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane) |
| Condensate | Pentane and heavier hydrocarbons |
| Natural Gas | |
| Mcf | Thousands of cubic feet |
| Mcf/d | Thousands of cubic feet per day |
| MMcf/d | Millions of cubic feet per day |
| MMbtu | Million of British thermal units |
| MMbtu/d | Million of British thermal units per day |
| Oil Equivalent | |
| Boe | Barrels of oil equivalent |
| Boe/d | Barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
This news release refers to certain measures that are not determined in accordance with IFRS (or "GAAP"). These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful than, financial measures that are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of the Company's performance. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP and other financial measures provides useful information to shareholders and investors in understanding and evaluating the Company's ongoing operating performance, and the measures provide increased transparency to better analyze the Company's performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted funds flow (used)
Management uses adjusted funds flow (used) to analyze performance and considers it a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's ability to generate the cash necessary to fund future capital investments and abandonment obligations and to repay debt, if any. Adjusted funds flow (used) is a non-GAAP financial measure and has been defined by the Company as cash flow from (used in) operating activities excluding the change in non-cash working capital related to operating activities, movements in restricted cash deposits and expenditures on decommissioning obligations. Management believes the timing of collection, payment or incurrence of these items involves a high degree of discretion and as such may not be useful for evaluating the Company's cash flows. Adjusted funds flow (used) is reconciled from cash flow from (used in) operating activities as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Cash flow used in operating activities | (3,730 | ) | (2,553 | ) | (954 | ) | (3,830 | ) | ||||
| Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
| Decommissioning expenditures | 790 | 925 | 1,266 | 1,677 | ||||||||
| Change in restricted cash deposits | 2,139 | - | 2,985 | (784 | ) | |||||||
| Change in non-cash working capital | 594 | 855 | (2,164 | ) | 854 | |||||||
| Adjusted funds flow (used) (non-GAAP) | (207 | ) | (773 | ) | 1,133 | (2,083 | ) | |||||
Net transportation expenses
Management considers net transportation expenses an important measure as it demonstrates the cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses is calculated as transportation expenses less unutilized transportation and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Transportation expenses | 1,055 | 654 | 2,426 | 1,250 | ||||||||
| Unutilized transportation | (757 | ) | (525 | ) | (1,504 | ) | (773 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses (non-GAAP) | 298 | 129 | 922 | 477 | ||||||||
Operating netback
Management considers operating netback an important measure as it demonstrates its profitability relative to current commodity prices. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalties, operating expenses, and net transportation expenses and is calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Oil and natural gas sales | 2,362 | 679 | 9,192 | 2,459 | ||||||||
| Royalties | (383 | ) | (152 | ) | (1,878 | ) | (623 | ) | ||||
| Operating expenses | (767 | ) | (350 | ) | (2,549 | ) | (1,249 | ) | ||||
| Net transportation expenses | (298 | ) | (129 | ) | (922 | ) | (477 | ) | ||||
| Operating netback (non-GAAP) | 914 | 48 | 3,843 | 110 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures
Coelacanth utilizes capital expenditures as a measure of capital investment on property, plant, and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets and property acquisitions compared to its annual budgeted capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are calculated as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| ($000s) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures - property, plant, and equipment | 396 | 15,785 | 973 | 22,344 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures - exploration and evaluation assets | 15,364 | 15,391 | 18,572 | 17,613 | ||||||||
| Capital expenditures (non-GAAP) | 15,760 | 31,176 | 19,545 | 39,957 | ||||||||
Capital Management Measures
Adjusted working capital
Management uses adjusted working capital as a measure to assess the Company's financial position. Adjusted working capital is calculated as current assets and restricted cash deposits less current liabilities, excluding the current portion of decommissioning obligations.
| ($000s) | September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||
| Current assets | 49,905 | 87,616 | ||||
| Less: | ||||||
| Current liabilities | (14,235 | ) | (28,754 | ) | ||
| Working capital | 35,670 | 58,862 | ||||
| Add: | ||||||
| Restricted cash deposits | 10,001 | 6,784 | ||||
| Current portion of decommissioning obligations | 1,593 | 1,943 | ||||
| Adjusted working capital (Capital management measure) | 47,264 | 67,589 |
Non-GAAP Financial Ratios
Adjusted Funds Flow (Used) per Share
Adjusted funds flow (used) per share is a non-GAAP financial ratio, calculated using adjusted funds flow (used) and the same weighted average basic and diluted shares used in calculating net loss per share.
Net transportation expenses per boe
The Company utilizes net transportation expenses per boe to assess the per unit cost of utilized transportation related to the Company's production. Net transportation expenses per boe is calculated as net transportation expenses divided by total production for the applicable period.
Operating netback per boe
The Company utilizes operating netback per boe to assess the operating performance of its petroleum and natural gas assets on a per unit of production basis. Operating netback per boe is calculated as operating netback divided by total production for the applicable period.
Supplementary Financial Measures
The supplementary financial measures used in this news release (primarily average sales price per product type and certain per boe and per share figures) are either a per unit disclosure of a corresponding GAAP measure, or a component of a corresponding GAAP measure, presented in the financial statements. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a per unit basis are calculated by dividing the aggregate GAAP measure (or component thereof) by the applicable unit for the period. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a component basis of a corresponding GAAP measure are a granular representation of a financial statement line item and are determined in accordance with GAAP.
PRODUCT TYPES
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:
Natural gas refers to shale gas
Oil and condensate refers to condensate and tight oil combined
Other NGLs refers to butane, propane and ethane combined
Oil and NGLs refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent.
The following is a complete breakdown of sales volumes for applicable periods by specific product types of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs:
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||
| Sales Volumes by Product Type | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 33 | 4 | 36 | 6 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 36 | 12 | ||||||||
| NGLs (bbls/d) | 66 | 11 | 72 | 18 | ||||||||
| Tight oil (bbls/d) | 188 | 35 | 232 | 40 | ||||||||
| Condensate (bbls/d) | 33 | 4 | 36 | 6 | ||||||||
| Oil and condensate (bbls/d) | 221 | 39 | 268 | 46 | ||||||||
| Other NGLs (bbls/d) | 33 | 7 | 36 | 12 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGLs (bbls/d) | 254 | 46 | 304 | 58 | ||||||||
| Shale gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 3,702 | 1,208 | ||||||||
| Natural gas (mcf/d) | 3,450 | 929 | 3,702 | 1,208 | ||||||||
| Oil equivalent (boe/d) | 829 | 201 | 921 | 259 | ||||||||
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "intends", "forecast", "plans", "guidance" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company's oil and condensate, other NGLs, and natural gas production, capital programs, and adjusted working capital. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities, and the availability and cost of labour and services.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs, and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty, and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company's expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Coelacanth is an oil and natural gas company, actively engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas reserves in northeastern British Columbia, Canada.
Further Information
For additional information, please contact:
Coelacanth Energy Inc.
Suite 2110, 530 - 8th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: (403) 705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca
Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/230803
News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia
Historically, oil price swings would set off alarms about inflation. But today’s economists are more cautious about declaring oil as the prime driver of consumer price hikes.
Before examining the changing relationship between oil prices and inflation, it's important to understand the link between oil and the economy.
Traditionally, the most-watched inflation indicator is the consumer price index (CPI), which the US Bureau of Labor Statistics defines as “a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services.”
The CPI basket includes products and services in many categories, with the highest weighted ones including shelter, food, energy, transportation, medical care, recreation, education and communication.
While oil price movements are directly reflected by the energy category, their economic impact has historically stretched beyond that.
At the macroeconomic level, higher oil prices make it more expensive for companies to produce and transport goods or offer services. Rising oil prices can also indirectly raise the costs of production, transportation and heating for businesses, making production more expensive. In turn, producers may choose to pass on those costs to consumers.
At the microeconomic level, rising prices at the pump and in stores can cut into discretionary spending that might otherwise have been spent on new electronics, clothes or a vacation. Higher goods and services prices in the long term can dampen demand for those products, leading to slow economic growth or even a recession.
However, a 2023 analysis by the US Federal Reserve focused on oil prices and inflation in advanced economies showed that the ripple-through effect of rising oil prices on other parts of the economy has lessened over time.
“History shows the two are correlated, but the relationship has deteriorated since the oil price spike of the 1970s,” said Bob Iaccino, co-founder of Path Trading Partners.
Indeed, the narrative that oil prices directly cause inflation is now considered an oversimplification by many. New evidence, both historical and structural, points instead to a much more nuanced, and at times inverse, relationship between the two.
In the 1970s and early 1980s, the world witnessed back-to-back oil crises triggered by the OPEC embargo in 1973 and the Iranian Revolution in 1979. Oil prices soared, and inflation in the US and other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) economies followed suit. By the end of 1980, the CPI had more than doubled, giving rise to the term “stagflation” — a period of low growth, high unemployment and high inflation.
But the underlying causes of that inflation are now contested.
An analysis by Lutz Kilian, vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, challenges the traditional view.
“Worldwide shifts in monetary policy regimes in the early 1970s played a major role in causing both oil price increases and the high inflation in many OECD economies,” Killian highlighted in a 2024 presentation.
Under this view, it was expansionary monetary policy — not oil prices alone — that lit the inflationary fire.
Structural models have shown that the primary cause of price surges was oil demand shocks, rather than supply shocks or geopolitically driven shortages. The oil price, in many respects, followed inflationary pressures rather than led them.
The relationship between oil prices and the CPI has eroded in the years since then. When the fuel climbed from US$14 to US$30 per barrel within six months in 1991 during the first Gulf War, the CPI barely budged.
Additionally, the monumental oil price rally that drove crude prices up from just US$16 to US$50 between 1999 and 2005 had a marginal impact on the CPI. More importantly, these more recent oil prices spikes had little impact on economic growth, unemployment rates or inflation levels.
What's behind this decoupling?
Some have suggested improvements in energy efficiency have lowered energy consumption per dollar across many industries. Others have argued that since the 1990s, monetary policymakers have changed the methods by which they control inflation, in effect softening the impact of higher oil prices.
Economists, including those at the St. Louis Federal Reserve, have pointed to the fact that the US CPI basket has increasingly become more heavily weighted with services rather than goods tied to oil.
In the past, the Federal Reserve often responded to rising inflation (and by extension, oil prices) by raising interest rates. But does this monetary tightening then pull oil prices down?
Not necessarily. In fact, Iaccino pointed out in 2022 that in the last six rate hike cycles, oil prices actually rose by an average of 16.06 percent in the six months following the first hike of each cycle, although the hikes themselves may not be the cause of that pattern.
“There are many other factors affecting the price of crude oil, including geopolitics and sudden increases in supply or demand,” he noted. “Typically, rising crude oil prices are either a significant component in the cause of broader inflation, or the rise in oil price is a function of a strong economy and greater demand.”
This complexity was on full display in 2023. Oil prices briefly dipped after the Fed raised interest rates in May, but they rebounded quickly, climbing from US$65.48 in early May to US$83.60 by late July — even after another rate hike. It was clear that supply-side dynamics, such as OPEC+ production decisions and falling US inventories, had a stronger short-term influence than monetary policy.
The first quarter of 2025 has reinforced the idea that oil prices are shaped more by geopolitics and market fundamentals than by central banks.
Oil prices started the year above US$70 and climbed through mid-January. However, they pulled back through the remainder of the quarter as economic instability led by US tariff threats and trade wars coupled with soft demand weighed on prices.
Prices tumbled even further in April after OPEC+ reversed course on production cuts, announcing a 411,000 barrel-per-day production increase. Analysts saw this move as a punitive measure against over-producing members like Iraq and Kazakhstan, despite the group officially claiming it was to “support market stability.”
In April, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, told the Investing News Network, “We're into supply destruction territory for some of the high-cost producers.” He added that if prices remain in the high US$50s, US output will likely slow — a dynamic that may help realign supply and demand later in the year.
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) now expects Brent crude to average US$68 per barrel in 2025, citing growing inventories and subdued demand. The EIA's April report also forecasts a further drop to US$61 per barrel in 2026.
While oil is an important factor in inflation dynamics, it is no longer the inflationary hammer it once was.
As Kilian emphasizes, “Rising oil prices were a symptom rather than the cause of high US inflation (in the 1970s)." That lesson appears to hold true today, as monetary policy, labor costs and supply chain dynamics play increasingly dominant roles in shaping price pressures.
Moreover, the disconnect between headline oil prices and refined product costs, such as gasoline or diesel, complicates matters. Factors like refining costs, taxes and distribution markups can dilute the direct pass-through of crude oil changes to the consumer level.
Natural gas markets illustrate a parallel complexity. While colder-than-average winter conditions in early 2025 pushed US natural gas prices up 13.9 percent in Q1, the overall inflationary impact has remained marginal and contained largely within energy-related sectors.
The once-clear link between oil and inflation has become fogged by decades of structural economic shifts, policy changes and new global dynamics. Oil prices remain an important — but no longer dominant — signal of inflation.
In 2025, watching oil is still useful, but interpreting its message requires caution. A broader macroeconomic view does not demonstrate a single cause-and-effect story anymore, but rather a crucial variable in a vastly interconnected market propelled by real-world events.
In other words, the next time oil prices spike or plunge, investors, policymakers and consumers alike should ask a more complicated question: Why?
This is an updated version of an article first published by the Investing News Network in 2021.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Alvopetro Energy Ltd. (TSXV: ALV) (OTCQX: ALVOF) announces an operational update, financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and details for both our Q1 2025 earnings call and our upcoming annual general and special meeting.
All references herein to $ refer to United States dollars, unless otherwise stated and all tabular amounts are in thousands of United States dollars, except as otherwise noted.
President & CEO, Corey C. Ruttan commented:
"A 41% increase in Q1 2025 sales volumes provides a strong start to the year and we are well positioned for an exciting organically funded 2025 capital program. We now have the ability to invest in high rate of return opportunities in Brazil and the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Our first two wells in Canada are exceeding expectations and we are looking forward to an expanding capital program including a strong inventory of oil drilling locations. These new opportunities further strengthen our disciplined capital allocation model, balancing returns to stakeholders and organic growth."
Operational Update
April Sales Volumes
Natural gas, NGLs and crude oil sales: | April 2025 | March 2025 | Q1 2025 |
Brazil: | |||
Natural gas (Mcfpd), by field: | |||
Caburé | 12,532 | 12,652 | 11,710 |
Murucututu | 945 | 1,877 | 2,093 |
Total natural gas (Mcfpd) | 13,477 | 14,529 | 13,803 |
NGLs (bopd) | 126 | 146 | 135 |
Oil (bopd) | - | 12 | 10 |
Total (boepd) – Brazil | 2,372 | 2,580 | 2,446 |
Canada: | |||
Oil (bopd) – Canada | 90 | - | - |
Total Company – boepd (1) | 2,462 | 2,580 | 2,446 |
(1) Alvopetro reported volumes are based on sales volumes which, due to the timing of sales deliveries, may differ from production volumes. |
April sales volumes in Brazil averaged 2,372 boepd, including natural gas sales of 13.5 MMcfpd and associated natural gas liquids sales from condensate of 126 bopd, based on field estimates. Murucututu sales volumes were impacted by downtime on the 183-A3 well to complete an intervention to enhance productivity through the isolation of lower intervals. In Canada , the two wells drilled in the first quarter of 2025 came on production in April (50% working interest). After the initial clean-up period, oil sales commenced contributing an additional 90 bopd net to Alvopetro in April and bringing the Company's total sales to 2,462 boepd, based on field estimates, a decrease of 5% compared to March and an increase of 1% compared to Q1.
Quarterly Natural Gas Pricing Update
Effective May 1, 2025 , our natural gas price under our long-term gas sales agreement with Bahiagás has been adjusted to BRL2.08 /m 3 , a 7% increase from the February 2025 price of BRL1.95 /m 3 . All natural gas sales from May 1, 2025 to July 31, 2025 will be sold at BRL2.08 /m 3 ( $11.09 /Mcf, net of applicable sales taxes, based on average heat content to date and the April 30, 2025 BRL/USD exchange rate of 5.66).
Development Activities - Brazil
On our 100% Murucututu natural gas field, we spud the 183-D4 well targeting the Caruaçu Formation approximately 110 metres structurally updip of our 183-A3 success. Operational challenges associated with the drilling rig led to significant delays and while drilling the main target Caruaçu intervals we became differentially stuck ultimately resulting in the loss of the bottom hole assembly. We are currently drilling a sidetrack of the lower 680 metres of the well. We estimate total costs for the project of $7.7 million , of which $3.7 million was incurred in Q1 2025.
On the unitized area (the "Unit") which includes the Caburé natural gas field, we have five development wells planned for 2025, with the first wells expected to be drilled starting this quarter.
Western Canadian Strategic Entry
On February 5, 2025 , we announced a new strategic entry into Canada (the "Farmin"). Under the Farmin we agreed to fund 100% of two earning wells in exchange for a 50% non-operated working interest in 12,243 acres of land focused on the Mannville Stack heavy oil resource in Western Saskatchewan . This is currently one of the leading plays in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin with high original oil place reservoirs that are being effectively exploited using open hole multilateral drilling technology. Our objective with the strategic entry into Canada was to expand our inventory of highly prospective opportunities but with a differentiated risk profile. The early results from our first two earning wells in Western Canada demonstrate this vision. Within 45 days of finalizing the Farmin, with our partner, we had obtained two well licenses, surface access, constructed two well pads and drilled two multilateral wells with a total of over 15 kilometres of open hole reservoir contact. When we completed the Farmin we had established a gross initial production rate target of 100 to 120 bopd per well. Both earning wells were on production by early April and both are exceeding our pre-Farmin expectations. We have further expanded our joint Mannville focused land base up to 15,861 acres (7,931 acres net) and are looking forward to drilling up to an additional four (2.0 net) multilateral wells through the rest of 2025.
Financial and Operating Highlights – First Quarter of 2025
(1) Alvopetro reported volumes are based on sales volumes which, due to the timing of sales deliveries, may differ from production volumes. |
(2) Refer to the sections entitled " Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures ". |
The following table provides a summary of Alvopetro's financial and operating results for the periods noted. The consolidated financial statements with the Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") are available on our website at www.alvopetro.com and will be available on the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca .
As at and Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||
2025 | 2024 | Change (%) | ||||
Financial | ||||||
($000s, except where noted) | ||||||
Natural gas, oil and condensate sales | 14,013 | 11,752 | 19 | |||
Net income | 6,070 | 4,550 | 33 | |||
Per share – basic ($) (1) | 0.16 | 0.12 | 33 | |||
Per share – diluted ($) (1) | 0.16 | 0.12 | 33 | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | 8,817 | 8,213 | 7 | |||
Per share – basic ($) (1) | 0.24 | 0.22 | 9 | |||
Per share – diluted ($) (1) | 0.23 | 0.22 | 5 | |||
Funds flow from operations (2) | 9,222 | 8,513 | 8 | |||
Per share – basic ($) (1) | 0.25 | 0.23 | 9 | |||
Per share – diluted ($) (1) | 0.24 | 0.23 | 4 | |||
Dividends declared | 3,643 | 3,296 | 11 | |||
Per share (1) (2) | 0.10 | 0.09 | 11 | |||
Capital expenditures | 8,375 | 2,439 | 243 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 17,264 | 17,450 | (1) | |||
Net working capital (2) | 9,742 | 15,047 | (35) | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||
Basic (000s) (1) | 37,312 | 37,282 | - | |||
Diluted (000s) (1) | 37,752 | 37,693 | - | |||
As at and Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||
2025 | 2024 | Change | ||||
Operations | ||||||
Average daily sales volumes (3) : | ||||||
Natural gas (Mcfpd), by field: | ||||||
Caburé (Mcfpd) | 11,710 | 9,236 | 27 | |||
Murucututu (Mcfpd) | 2,093 | 430 | 387 | |||
Total natural gas (Mcfpd) | 13,803 | 9,666 | 43 | |||
NGLs – condensate (bopd) | 135 | 78 | 73 | |||
Oil (bopd) | 10 | 12 | (17) | |||
Total (boepd) | 2,446 | 1,701 | 44 | |||
Average realized prices (2) : | ||||||
Natural gas ($/Mcf) | 10.44 | 12.57 | (17) | |||
NGLs – condensate ($/bbl) | 81.05 | 87.89 | (8) | |||
Oil ($/bbl) | 64.96 | 65.06 | - | |||
Total ($/boe) | 63.67 | 75.94 | (16) | |||
Operating netback ($/boe) (2) | ||||||
Realized sales price | 63.67 | 75.94 | (16) | |||
Royalties | (7.60) | (2.02) | 276 | |||
Production expenses | (5.30) | (7.76) | (32) | |||
Operating netback | 50.77 | 66.16 | (23) | |||
Operating netback margin (2) | 80 % | 87 % | (8) | |||
Notes:
(1) | Per share amounts are based on weighted average shares outstanding other than dividends per share, which is based on the number of common shares outstanding at each dividend record date. The weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding in the computation of funds flow from operations and cash flows from operating activities per share is the same as for net income per share. |
(2) | See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" section within this news release. |
(3) | Alvopetro reported volumes are based on sales volumes which, due to the timing of sales deliveries, may differ from production volumes. |
Q1 2025 Results Webcast
Alvopetro will host a live webcast to discuss our Q1 2025 financial results at 8:00 am Mountain time on Thursday May 8, 2025. Details for joining the event are as follows:
DATE: May 8, 2025
TIME : 8:00 AM Mountain/ 10:00 AM Eastern
LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83279531812 https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84476502014
DIAL-IN NUMBERS: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kcHhjt9Duj
WEBINAR ID : 844 7650 2014
The webcast will include a question-and-answer period. Online participants will be able to ask questions through the Zoom portal. Dial-in participants can email questions directly to socialmedia@alvopetro.com .
Annual General Meeting
Alvopetro's annual general and special meeting (the "Meeting") will be held on Wednesday, June 18, 2025 at the offices of Torys LLP (Suite 4600, 525 8 th SW, Calgary, Alberta ) beginning at 9:30 a.m. Mountain time. The management information circular and all related materials will be available on our website and www.sedarplus.ca later this month.
All interested parties are invited to attend the Meeting. We will also be broadcasting the meeting via live webcast for the interest of all shareholders. Please be advised that shareholders will not be able to vote any shares through this webcast format. Details for joining the event are as follows:
DATE: June 18, 2025
TIME : 9:30 AM Mountain/ 11:30 AM Eastern
LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83279531812 https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89512204386
DIAL-IN NUMBERS: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kenh5nLlte
WEBINAR ID : 895 1220 4386
Corporate Presentation
Alvopetro's updated corporate presentation is available on our website at:
http://www.alvopetro.com/corporate-presentation .
Social Media
Follow Alvopetro on our social media channels at the following links:
Twitter - https://twitter.com/AlvopetroEnergy
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/alvopetro/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/alvopetro-energy-ltd
Alvopetro Energy Ltd. is deploying a balanced capital allocation model where we seek to reinvest roughly half our cash flows into organic growth opportunities and return the other half to stakeholders. Alvopetro's organic growth strategy is to focus on the best combinations of geologic prospectivity and fiscal regime. Alvopetro is balancing capital investment opportunities in Canada and Brazil where we are building off the strength of our Caburé and Murucututu natural gas fields and the related strategic midstream infrastructure.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
Abbreviations:
$000s | = | thousands of U.S. dollars |
boepd | = | barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") per day |
bopd | = | barrels of oil and/or natural gas liquids (condensate) per day |
BRL | = | Brazilian Real |
Mcf | = | thousand cubic feet |
Mcfpd | = | thousand cubic feet per day |
MMcf | = | million cubic feet |
MMcfpd | = | million cubic feet per day |
NGLs | = | natural gas liquids (condensate) |
Q1 2024 | = | three months ended March 31, 2024 |
Q1 2025 | = | three months ended March 31, 2025 |
Q4 2024 | = | three months ended December 31, 2024 |
USD | = | United States dollars |
GAAP or IFRS | = | IFRS Accounting Standards |
Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
This news release contains references to various non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios, capital management measures and supplementary financial measures as such terms are defined in National Instrument 52-112 Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures Disclosure . Such measures are not recognized measures under GAAP and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and might not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. While these measures may be common in the oil and gas industry, the Company's use of these terms may not be comparable to similarly defined measures presented by other companies. The non-GAAP and other financial measures referred to in this report should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than measures prescribed by IFRS and they are not meant to enhance the Company's reported financial performance or position. These are complementary measures that are used by management in assessing the Company's financial performance, efficiency and liquidity and they may be used by investors or other users of this document for the same purpose. Below is a description of the non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios, capital management measures and supplementary financial measures used in this news release. For more information with respect to financial measures which have not been defined by GAAP, including reconciliations to the closest comparable GAAP measure, see the " Non-GAAP Measures and Other Financial Measures " section of the Company's MD&A which may be accessed through the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca .
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Operating Netback
Operating netback is calculated as natural gas, oil and condensate revenues less royalties and production expenses. This calculation is provided in the " Operating Netback " section of the Company's MD&A using our IFRS measures. The Company's MD&A may be accessed through the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca . Operating netback is a common metric used in the oil and gas industry used to demonstrate profitability from operations.
Non-GAAP Financial Ratios
Operating Netback per boe
Operating netback is calculated on a per unit basis, which is per barrel of oil equivalent ("boe"). It is a common non-GAAP measure used in the oil and gas industry and management believes this measurement assists in evaluating the operating performance of the Company. It is a measure of the economic quality of the Company's producing assets and is useful for evaluating variable costs as it provides a reliable measure regardless of fluctuations in production. Alvopetro calculated operating netback per boe as operating netback divided by total sales volumes (boe). This calculation is provided in the " Operating Netback " section of the Company's MD&A using our IFRS measures. The Company's MD&A may be accessed through the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca . Operating netback is a common metric used in the oil and gas industry used to demonstrate profitability from operations on a per boe basis.
Operating netback margin
Operating netback margin is calculated as operating netback per boe divided by the realized sales price per boe. Operating netback margin is a measure of the profitability per boe relative to natural gas, oil and condensate sales revenues per boe and is calculated as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
2025 | 2024 | |||
Operating netback - $ per boe | 50.77 | 66.16 | ||
Average realized price - $ per boe | 63.67 | 75.94 | ||
Operating netback margin | 80 % | 87 % | ||
Funds Flow from Operations Per Share
Funds flow from operations per share is a non-GAAP ratio that includes all cash generated from operating activities and is calculated before changes in non-cash working capital, divided by the weighted average shares outstanding for the respective period. For the periods reported in this news release the cash flows from operating activities per share and funds flow from operations per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
$ per share | 2025 | 2024 | ||
Per basic share: | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities | 0.24 | 0.22 | ||
Funds flow from operations | 0.25 | 0.23 | ||
Per diluted share: | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities | 0.23 | 0.22 | ||
Funds flow from operations | 0.24 | 0.23 | ||
Capital Management Measures
Funds Flow from Operations
Funds flow from operations is a non-GAAP capital management measure that includes all cash generated from operating activities and is calculated before changes in non-cash working capital. The most comparable GAAP measure to funds flow from operations is cash flows from operating activities. Management considers funds flow from operations important as it helps evaluate financial performance and demonstrates the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash to fund future growth opportunities. Funds flow from operations should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flows from operating activities however management finds that the impact of working capital items on the cash flows reduces the comparability of the metric from period to period. A reconciliation of funds flow from operations to cash flows from operating activities is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
2025 | 2024 | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | 8,817 | 8,213 | ||
Changes in non-cash working capital | 405 | 300 | ||
Funds flow from operations | 9,222 | 8,513 | ||
Net Working Capital
Net working capital is computed as current assets less current liabilities. Net working capital is a measure of liquidity, is used to evaluate financial resources, and is calculated as follows:
As at March 31 | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Total current assets | 25,090 | 24,149 | |
Total current liabilities | (15,348) | (9,102) | |
Net working capital | 9,742 | 15,047 | |
Supplementary Financial Measures
" Average realized natural gas price - $/Mcf " is comprised of natural gas sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company's natural gas sales volumes.
" Average realized NGL – condensate price - $/bbl " is comprised of condensate sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company's NGL sales volumes from condensate.
" Average realized oil price - $/bbl " is comprised of oil sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company's oil sales volumes.
" Average realized price - $/boe " is comprised of natural gas, condensate and oil sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company's total natural gas, NGL and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).
" Dividends per share " is comprised of dividends declared, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the number of shares outstanding at the dividend record date.
" Royalties per boe " is comprised of royalties, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the total natural gas, NGL and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).
" Production expenses per boe " is comprised of production expenses, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the total natural gas, NGL and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).
BOE Disclosure
The term barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6 Mcf/bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalence is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. All boe conversions in this news release are derived from converting gas to oil in the ratio mix of six thousand cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil.
Contracted Natural Gas Volumes
The 2025 contracted daily firm volumes under Alvopetro's long-term gas sales agreement of 400 e 3 m 3 /d (before any provisions for take or pay allowances) represents contracted volumes based on contract referenced natural gas heating value. Alvopetro's reported natural gas sales volumes are prior to any adjustments for heating value of Alvopetro natural gas. Alvopetro's natural gas is approximately 7.8% higher than the contract reference heating value. Therefore, to satisfy the contractual firm deliveries Alvopetro would be required to deliver approximately 371e 3 m 3 /d (13.1MMcfpd).
Well Results
There is no representation by Alvopetro that the information contained in this news release with respect to initial production data from the wells drilled in Canada is necessarily indicative of long-term performance or ultimate recovery. The reader is cautioned not to unduly rely on such data as such data may not be indicative of future performance of the well or of expected production or operational results for Alvopetro in the future.
Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Language
This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words "will", "expect", "intend", "plan", "may", "believe", "estimate", "forecast", "anticipate", "should" and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information. Forward‐looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. A number of factors could cause actual results to vary significantly from the expectations discussed in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect current assumptions and expectations regarding future events. Accordingly, when relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions, Alvopetro cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these statements, as forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties. More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements concerning the expected natural gas price, gas sales and gas deliveries under Alvopetro's long-term gas sales agreement, future production and sales volumes, plans relating to the Company's operational activities, proposed exploration and development activities and the timing for such activities, capital spending levels, future capital and operating costs, the anticipated outcome of the GORR dispute, the timing and taxation of dividends and plans for dividends in the future, anticipated timing for upcoming drilling and testing of other wells, and projected financial results. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon assumptions and judgments with respect to the future including, but not limited to the success of future drilling, completion, testing, recompletion and development activities and the timing of such activities, the performance of producing wells and reservoirs, well development and operating performance, expectations and assumptions concerning the timing of regulatory licenses and approvals, equipment availability, environmental regulation, including regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing and stimulation, the ability to monetize hydrocarbons discovered, the outlook for commodity markets and ability to access capital markets, foreign exchange rates, the outcome of any disputes, the outcome of redeterminations, general economic and business conditions, forecasted demand for oil and natural gas, the impact of global pandemics, weather and access to drilling locations, the availability and cost of labour and services, and the regulatory and legal environment and other risks associated with oil and gas operations. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect. Actual results achieved during the forecast period will vary from the information provided herein as a result of numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors. Current and forecasted natural gas nominations are subject to change on a daily basis and such changes may be material. In addition, the declaration, timing, amount and payment of future dividends remain at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Although we believe that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because we can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses, reliance on industry partners, availability of equipment and personnel, uncertainty surrounding timing for drilling and completion activities resulting from weather and other factors, changes in applicable regulatory regimes and health, safety and environmental risks), commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, market uncertainty associated with trade or tariff disputes, and general economic conditions. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect. Although Alvopetro believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking information is based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking information because Alvopetro can give no assurance that it will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on factors that could affect the operations or financial results of Alvopetro are included in our AIF which may be accessed on Alvopetro's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca . The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof and Alvopetro undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
SOURCE Alvopetro Energy Ltd.
View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2025/07/c6827.html
News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia
