The Conversation (0)
Frontier Energy Limited (ASX: FHE; OTCQB: FRHYF) (Frontier or the Company) is pleased to announce it has reached an in-principle agreement with the City of Perth for the development of WA’s first publicly available Green Hydrogen Refuelling Station (Refuelling Station).
HIGHLIGHTS
- Frontier Energy and City of Perth to develop WA’s first publicly available green hydrogen refuelling station in West Perth
- Proposed location of refuelling station is approximately 2km from Central Perth
- WA Government has identified domestically produced green hydrogen as a key to reducing WA’s reliance on diesel imports
- There is vast potential for reducing WA’s emissions by replacing diesel and petrol with green hydrogen in transport and bulk haulage
Frontier and the City of Perth have identified and selected a convenient and accessible location for this refuelling station on City of Perth-owned land at Thomas St, West Perth. This location is approximately 2km from Central Perth, near the Mitchell and Kwinana Freeway access points. Hydrogen powered vehicles have faster refuelling times and the ability to travel longer distances carrying larger loads before refuelling.
Development of this refuelling station is subject to final approvals, as well as a Final Investment Decision by Frontier.
Image 1 – Map of Refuelling Station location and surrounding infrastructure
Perth City Lord Mayor Basil Zempilas commented: “Hydrogen-fuelled cars are predicted to grow in popularity over the coming years so having a city-based refuelling station forms an important part of our sustainability plan.
“Frontier Energy is working to become one of the first companies in Australia to produce green hydrogen commercially and will be an important partner for the City as we strive to create a healthy city where environmental, social and economic systems are in balance.”
Frontier Managing Director, Sam Lee Mohan, commented: “The displacement of diesel by hydrogen, most notably in the long haulage industry, is likely to be a major market for hydrogen in the future. Critical to the development of this industry is not only the development of the green hydrogen product, but also the development of critical associated infrastructure such as refuelling stations.
“This initiative aligns with Frontier’s long-term ambition to become a vertically integrated producer across the renewable energy sector, including green hydrogen. The Company would like to thank the City of Perth for its work in arriving at this point and we look forward to developing this exciting project together.”
Using green hydrogen to replace diesel and petrol
Hydrogen can be used as fuel to power Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV) including cars, buses, trucks, and trains. Refuelling hydrogen cars, buses and trucks requires a network of refuelling stations, similar to the existing petrol station network.
Benefits:
FCEVs are more efficient than conventional internal combustion engine vehicles and produce no harmful tailpipe emissions. The advantages of hydrogen powered vehicles compared to battery electric vehicles include faster refuelling times and the ability to travel longer distances carrying larger loads before refuelling.
This is perhaps most apparent in long-haul road transportation, which is hugely important to WA’s economy, where the combination of battery weight, extended recharging times and limited range are impediments for purely electric solutions. On each of these factors, FCEVs offer an attractive alternative.
When energy contained in fuel and engine efficiencies are accounted for, hydrogen in a FCEV drive is approximately equivalent to 4 - 6 times diesel on a $/kg basis. This implies that a $8-12/kg hydrogen price is equivalent to a ~$2/kg diesel price (in line with current prices), as measured by equivalent output in a diesel car or a FCEV. Additional premium for zero emissions is likely to accrue to hydrogen used in transport.
Refuelling station technology and FCEV technology is maturing, with stations and fleets being rolled out globally.
WA Opportunity:
Currently, there are no publicly accessible refuelling stations in WA and only a very small FCEV fleet.
Click here for the full ASX Release
This article includes content from Frontier Energy, licensed for the purpose of publishing on Investing News Australia. This article does not constitute financial product advice. It is your responsibility to perform proper due diligence before acting upon any information provided here. Please refer to our full disclaimer here.
FHE:AU
CoTec Holdings: Innovating the Future of Resource Extraction
CoTec Holdings (TSXV:CTH,OTCQB:CTHCF) (CoTec) leverages disruptive technologies to undervalued critical mineral assets and waste materials into high-value commodities essential for a low-carbon future. The company offers a unique investment opportunity, characterized by low cost, lower capex, faster cash flow generation, and superior returns through innovation and strategic execution.
CoTec targets sectors crucial to today’s evolving economies like rare earth magnet recycling, green steel production and copper waste processing by advancing four cutting-edge technologies and three strategic assets.
CoTec's medium-term goal of acquiring 10 technologies and 20 to 30 assets. The company’s business model is supported by partnerships, joint ventures (JVs), and a disciplined capital management strategy to unlock value across its portfolio.
CoTec is guided by a highly experienced management team and board of directors with deep expertise in mining, technology and corporate finance.
Company Highlights
- CoTec deploys cutting-edge, low-carbon technologies to marginal assets, reclamation opportunities and recycling initiatives, transforming waste materials into strategic, high-value commodities.
- The company holds stakes in four groundbreaking technologies — HyProMag, Binding Solutions, MagIron and Ceibo. These technologies are designed to unlock significant value across strategically chosen assets. The Lac Jeannine iron project in Quebec, with an after tax NPV of US$59.9 million, stands on its own merits but could see further economic and environmental enhancements through the application of CoTec’s technologies. Similarly, HyProMag USA is pioneering the rollout of HyProMag’s rare earth recycling technology in the United States, delivering low-cost, magnet-to-magnet low-carbon resource recovery.
- CoTec accelerates the transition from discovery to production through proprietary technologies and strategic joint ventures, enabling significantly faster revenue generation compared to traditional mining operations.
- Backed by a management team with extensive expertise in mining, finance and technology, CoTec is uniquely positioned to drive innovation and growth in the critical minerals sector.
- Approximately 74 percent of the company is owned by management and insiders, demonstrating the leadership’s strong commitment to the company’s success.
This CoTec Holdings profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*
Click here to connect with CoTec Holdings (TSXV:CTH,OTCQB:CTHCF) to receive an Investor Presentation
Troy Minerals Reports Analytical Results from Table Mountain Silica Project, Identifying Broad High-Purity Zones
Troy Minerals Inc. ("Troy" or the "Company") (CSE:TROY)(OTCQB:TROYF)(FSE:VJ3) is pleased to announce that it has received results from a sampling and mapping program on its 100% owned Table Mountain Silica Project, located near Golden, British Columbia, Canada.
Key Highlights
- Three distinct zones of high-purity silica mineralization identified within the Mount Wilson Quartzite Formation.
- 98.86% SiO₂ over a total of 62.11 metres of channel sampling in five channels at the main Table Mountain Zone.
- Outcrop sampling returned 98.18% to 99.74% SiO2 from 45 samples at Table Mountain Zone, 97.83% to 99.49% SiO₂ from 13 samples at South Zone, and 95.82% to 99.82% SiO₂ from 29 samples at Southeast Zone. *
- Very low deleterious elements identified in all samples.
President of Troy Minerals Inc., Yannis Tsitos commented: "These comprehensive maiden assay results validate the potential of Table Mountain as a key high-purity silica asset. Sampling confirmed the exceptional quality and consistency of silica mineralization across the Project. With grades reaching 98 to 99% SiO₂ across multiple zones of extensive outcrop exposure, and sampling ranging from 98.18% to 99.74% SiO₂ at the main Table Mountain Zone, we are rapidly advancing our understanding of this strategic asset. The Project's infrastructure advantages and proximity to existing silica operations further enhance its potential as we work to establish Troy as a significant player in the North American high-purity silica market, positioning the Company for long-term growth."
The sampling program consisted of both systematic grab samples and channel samples, with a total of 110 grab samples (107 outcrop and 3 float) taken within the property area and 70 channel samples collected from 62.11 metres within 74.16 metres of channels.
Figure 1. Index Map
Outcrop Sampling Results
Three main areas returned significant high-purity silica results: the Table Mountain Zone, located at the north end of the Property, the South Zone, and the Southeast Zone.
The most extensively sampled zone was the Table Mountain Zone, which returned an average grade of 98.90% SiO₂ from 45 grab samples (42 outcrop, 3 float), with values ranging from 98.18% to 99.74% SiO₂. Additionally, from these samples the following average values were returned: 0.31% Fe₂O₃, 0.01% CaO, 0.14% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, 0.01% TiO₂, 0.01% P₂O₅, and 14ppm boron. See Figure 2 and Table 1. *
Figure 2. Table Mountain Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 1. Table Mountain Zone Outcrop Samples
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
299516 | 509114 | 5685249 | 99.41 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.39 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
299517 | 509193 | 5685166 | 98.84 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 8 |
299518 | 509314 | 5685171 | 99.20 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 10 |
299519 | 509350 | 5685151 | 98.26 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 15 |
299520 | 509369 | 5685129 | 99.20 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.21 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 16 |
299521 | 509395 | 5685107 | 99.17 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 8 |
299522 | 509418 | 5685094 | 98.78 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 12 |
299523 | 509442 | 5685075 | 98.59 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.26 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 12 |
299524 | 509450 | 5685043 | 99.74 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 6 |
299525 | 509471 | 5685019 | 98.58 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299526 | 509482 | 5684990 | 99.25 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299527 | 509500 | 5684961 | 99.66 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299528 | 509515 | 5684938 | 99.21 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299529 | 509538 | 5684911 | 99.13 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299530 | 509561 | 5684862 | 98.18 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299531 | 509598 | 5684823 | 98.93 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299532 | 509583 | 5684759 | 98.99 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299533 | 509619 | 5684743 | 98.72 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 14 |
299534 | 509641 | 5684726 | 98.18 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 15 |
299535 | 509712 | 5684697 | 99.41 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299536 | 509736 | 5684685 | 99.27 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7 |
299537 | 509764 | 5684670 | 98.58 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 8 |
299548 | 509306 | 5685510 | 99.32 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 18 |
299560 | 509476 | 5685127 | 98.99 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 27 |
299561 | 509472 | 5685107 | 99.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299562 | 509457 | 5685115 | 98.74 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 28 |
299563 | 509439 | 5685112 | 98.35 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299564 | 509459 | 5685092 | 99.20 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.32 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299565 | 509487 | 5685107 | 99.49 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 28 |
299566 | 509490 | 5685083 | 98.48 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299567 | 509503 | 5685071 | 99.03 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 21 |
299568 | 509477 | 5685067 | 99.16 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299569 | 509478 | 5685044 | 98.68 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 20 |
299570 | 509506 | 5685041 | 98.46 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 29 |
299571 | 509523 | 5685054 | 98.81 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 22 |
299572 | 509382 | 5685160 | 98.42 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
299573 | 509397 | 5685160 | 98.92 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 18 |
299574 | 509406 | 5685142 | 99.12 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 17 |
299575 | 509409 | 5685120 | 98.56 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.37 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 21 |
299581 | 509357 | 5685172 | 98.84 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.32 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 18 |
299582 | 509429 | 5685142 | 98.87 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 8 |
299583 | 509446 | 5685146 | 98.25 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 17 |
299584 | 509455 | 5685145 | 99.49 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.27 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 5 |
299585 | 509473 | 5685142 | 98.66 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
299586 | 509493 | 5685133 | 98.52 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <5 |
Note: 299548, 299584, and 299585 are float samples taken near outcrop.
The South Zone, comprising 13 high-grade quartzite outcrop grab samples averaged 98.80% SiO₂ with values ranging from 97.83% to 99.49% SiO₂. These samples averaged 0.28% Fe₂O₃, 0.13% CaO, 0.13% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, <0.01% TiO₂, 0.02% P₂O₅, and 6ppm boron. See Figure 3 and Table 2. *
Figure 3. South Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 2. South Zone Outcrop Samples
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
248351 | 511603 | 5682006 | 98.60 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 15 |
248352 | 511563 | 5681948 | 99.45 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248353 | 511552 | 5681948 | 99.01 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 9 |
248354 | 511551 | 5681951 | 99.09 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 6 |
248355 | 511530 | 5681940 | 98.74 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.23 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248356 | 511522 | 5681942 | 98.82 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.31 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <5 |
248357 | 511512 | 5681951 | 98.31 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 5 |
248358 | 511485 | 5681948 | 98.14 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 8 |
248359 | 511461 | 5681935 | 99.49 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 10 |
248360 | 511436 | 5681932 | 99.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 5 |
248361 | 511444 | 5681918 | 99.42 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 6 |
248362 | 511440 | 5681942 | 97.83 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 8 |
248364 | 511374 | 5682002 | 98.43 | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.16 | <0.01 | <5 |
The Southeast Zone, comprising 29 high-grade quartzite outcrop grab samples, returned an average of 98.52% SiO₂ with values ranging from 95.82% to 99.82% SiO₂. Average values for other constituents were: 0.35% Fe₂O₃, 0.07% CaO, 0.30% Al₂O₃, 0.06% MgO, 0.02% TiO₂, <0.01% P₂O₅, and 26ppm boron. See Figure 4 and Table 3.*
Figure 4. Southeast Zone Outcrop Sampling - %SiO2
Table 3. Southeast Zone Outcrop Samples - %SiO2
Sample # | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
248384 | 513642 | 5680350 | 98.22 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 27 |
248385 | 513671 | 5680320 | 95.82 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 30 |
248386 | 513685 | 5680313 | 97.77 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 30 |
248387 | 513708 | 5680285 | 98.90 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 30 |
248388 | 513735 | 5680261 | 98.11 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 35 |
248389 | 513748 | 5680244 | 98.05 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 28 |
248390 | 513654 | 5680223 | 98.91 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 29 |
248391 | 513627 | 5680208 | 98.74 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 27 |
248392 | 513600 | 5680217 | 99.52 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
248393 | 513564 | 5680220 | 96.98 | 1.04 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 41 |
248394 | 513592 | 5680259 | 98.91 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 31 |
248395 | 513390 | 5680466 | 99.26 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 25 |
248396 | 513367 | 5680495 | 98.81 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 25 |
248397 | 513332 | 5680531 | 99.25 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
248398 | 513301 | 5680539 | 99.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
248399 | 513283 | 5680559 | 98.76 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.36 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 22 |
248400 | 513263 | 5680602 | 98.77 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 24 |
299501 | 513231 | 5680636 | 98.14 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299502 | 513188 | 5680660 | 99.05 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.27 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299503 | 513160 | 5680700 | 99.07 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 27 |
299504 | 513133 | 5680705 | 98.85 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 26 |
299508 | 513834 | 5679986 | 98.68 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 21 |
299509 | 513876 | 5679941 | 98.88 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 34 |
299510 | 513904 | 5679907 | 99.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 11 |
299511 | 513968 | 5679864 | 99.82 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 23 |
299512 | 514023 | 5679832 | 99.21 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 10 |
299513 | 514070 | 5679980 | 97.08 | 1.11 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 18 |
299514 | 514081 | 5680011 | 96.66 | 1.27 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 26 |
299515 | 514075 | 5680039 | 98.58 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 14 |
The remainder of samples were either taken near the contacts of the adjacent units or from non-quartzite outcrops of the adjacent Glenogle shale (east contact) and Beaverfoot dolomite (west contact) and were not included in the statistical summary of the quartzite samples taken.
Channel Sampling Results
Channel sampling was conducted at the Table Mountain Zone, with results consistently similar to the outcrop sampling results. Sampling procedure consisted of continuous chip sampling along a 3-centimetre cut channel. Samples were taken continuously over 1-metre intervals perpendicular to the strike orientation of the outcrop, with the sample sequence starting from the southwest end of the channel. Intervals shorter than 20 centimetres were combined with the previous interval. 66 continuous chip channel samples were collected over 62.11 metres within 74.16 metres in five channels, returning a weighted average of 98.86% SiO₂.
Four additional duplicates were taken as QA/QC checks and passed validation. Sample density is sufficient to indicate the accurate representation of the underlying mineralization.
See Figure 5 and Table 4 below.
Figure 5. Channel Sampling Locations - Table Mountain Zone
Table 4. Table Mountain Zone - Channel Sampling
Channel | From (m) | To (m) | Interval (m) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | MgO (%) | P2O5 (%) | TiO2 (%) | B (ppm) |
TM1 | 0.00 | 4.74 | 4.74 | 98.83 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 24 |
TM2 | 0.00 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 98.88 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 10 |
5.80 | 6.30 | 0.50 | Overburden | ||||||||
6.30 | 8.83 | 2.53 | 98.90 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 7 | |
8.83 | 9.38 | 0.55 | Overburden | ||||||||
9.38 | 13.0 | 3.62 | 99.21 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 11 | |
TM3 | 0.00 | 7.60 | 7.60 | 99.03 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 7 |
7.60 | 10.20 | 2.60 | Overburden | ||||||||
10.20 | 11.00 | 0.80 | 99.08 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6 | |
11.00 | 11.90 | 0.90 | Overburden | ||||||||
11.90 | 18.00 | 6.10 | 98.79 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 10 | |
TM4 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 5.22 | 99.09 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.33 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 12 |
TM5 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 98.82 | 0.15 | <0.01 | 0.29 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 15 |
3.80 | 4.50 | 0.70 | Overburden | ||||||||
4.50 | 7.00 | 2.50 | 98.85 | 0.12 | <0.01 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 20 | |
7.00 | 10.20 | 3.20 | Overburden | ||||||||
10.20 | 12.00 | 1.80 | 98.77 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.34 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 12 | |
12.00 | 13.00 | 1.00 | Overburden | ||||||||
13.00 | 17.50 | 4.50 | 98.30 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 13 | |
17.50 | 20.10 | 2.60 | Overburden | ||||||||
20.10 | 33.20 | 13.10 | 98.81 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.31 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 9 |
Discussion
Sampling results within the zones were consistently high purity, with the northern Table Mountain Zone returning the best and most consistent grades. The favourable grades reflect field observations of a broad zone of white quartzite measuring at least 150 metres wide and a strike length extending from the Trans-Canada Highway to the south and to the north, beyond the northern end of the Property, representing a total strike length of at least 4 kilometres. Although the western cliff face of Table Mountain clearly demarcates the western margin of the Mount Wilson Formation quartzite, the eastern margin is obscured by a deep boulder field originating from the extensive, steep quartzite exposure in this area.
Channels sampling results demonstrated a consistency in grade over a wide area within the Table Mountain Zone.
All samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories in North Vancouver, British Columbia for B-MS82L (boron) and ME-XRF26 (all other elements). Four sample duplicates were taken in the channel sampling sequence, and passed QA/QC.
* Cautionary Note
The reader is cautioned that grab samples are selective by nature and may not represent the true grade or style of mineralization across the property.
About the Table Mountain Project
The Table Mountain Silica Project comprises 2,304 hectares located 4 kilometres east of Golden, B.C., with excellent year-round access and proximity to the Canadian Pacific Railway Golden Rail Yard. The property hosts up to 10 kilometers of regionally mapped strike length of the Mount Wilson Formation, with apparent widths ranging from 300 to 1,400 metres at surface. The project is strategically positioned near both the Moberly Silica Mine and Sinova Quartz silica quarry, which exhibit economic grade silica greater than 99.6% SiO₂ purity.
Qualified Person
Technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Case Lewis, P.Geo., a "Qualified Person" as defined under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and a director of the Table Mountain Project vendor.
About Troy Minerals
Troy Minerals is a Canadian based publicly listed mining company focused on building shareholder value through acquisition, exploration, and development of strategically located "critical" mineral assets. Troy is aggressively advancing its projects within the silica (silicon), vanadium, and rare earths industries within regions that exhibit high and growing demand for such commodities, in both North America and Central-East Asia. The Company's primary objective is the near-term prospect of production with a vision of becoming a cash-flowing mining company to ultimately deliver tangible monetary value to shareholders, state, and local communities.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD,
Rana Vig | CEO & Director Telephone: 604-218-4766
Email: rana@ranavig.com
Forward-Looking Statements
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information: This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Troy Resources Inc. (the "Company") expects to occur, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "potential" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include results of exploration activities may not show quality and quantity necessary for further exploration or future exploitation of minerals deposits, volatility of commodity prices, and continued availability of capital and financing, permitting and other approvals, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.
The Canadian Securities Exchange has not reviewed this press release and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
