Barrick Gold Expects Lower Q3 Output Due to Tanzania Troubles

The world's largest gold miner believes its gold output will drop in Q3, but says it remains on track to meet its full-year guidance.

barrick gold

Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX,NYSE:ABX) anticipates a drop in Q3 gold output due to ongoing troubles at its Tanzanian unit, Acacia Mining (LSE:ACA).

In its preliminary quarterly report, the world’s top gold miner said it produced 1.24 million ounces of gold from July to September, less than the 1.38 million ounces it produced during the same period a year earlier. Barrick’s Q3 copper production rose to 115 million pounds from 100 million pounds a year ago.

Despite the decline in its gold production, the Canadian company said Thursday (October 12) that it is on track to meet its full-year production forecast of 5.3 to 5.6 million ounces of gold.

Gold Outlook Report - Late 2017!

Get your FREE Updated Gold Outlook Report. Includes expert commentary, production numbers and gold stocks to keep an eye on.

Click here to get your free report!

“Our operations continue to deliver solid results and remain on track for the year, with third-quarter gold and copper production in line with expectations,” Barrick President Kelvin Dushnisky said in a statement. “As stated previously, we expect higher production and lower costs in the fourth quarter.”

Barrick owns over 60 percent of Acacia Mining, and as mentioned, issues there are largely responsible for the company’s drop in Q3 production. Acacia Mining has been under pressure since the Tanzanian government accused it of evading taxes for years, and was hurt further after President John Magufuli imposed a ban on gold concentrate exports.

Earlier on Thursday, Acacia Mining reported that its gold production declined 8.3 percent, to 191,203 ounces, in the three months to September, impacting Barrick’s total output. The company is responsible for about a ten percent of Barrick’s gold production. 

Barrick is looking to end 2017 with $6.4 billion in debt, the lowest since 2010, according to a report last month from Bloomberg IntelligenceThe company will publish its full quarterly production and sales results on October 25.

As of 3:00 p.m. EST on Thursday, Barrick’s share price was down 0.12 percent in Toronto, at C$20.86. The company’s share price has lost almost 3 percent since January. Meanwhile, Acacia Mining was down 0.11 percent; it is down almost 50 percent year-to-date.

Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates.

Securities Disclosure: I, Priscila Barrera, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

FREE Report - How Will Trump Affect Your Gold Investments? 

Trump’s policies are affecting gold. You should know what’s going on. Click here to get our FREE report.

Click here to get your free report!

Discover what the experts see coming in the Age of Trump with our INN Insider's Report free of charge! Includes expert insights into Trump and his effect on mining and gold.

 

Get the Latest Gold Investing Stock Information

Get the latest information about companies associated with Gold Investing delivered directly to your inbox.

Gold
Gold Mine Development
Gold Production/Mining
Gold Project Generators
Gold Prospecting and Exploration
Gold Resource Definition/Pre Feasibility
Gold Resource Expansion/Feasibility Study/PEA
Other Companies

By selecting company or companies above, you are giving consent to receive email from those companies. And remember you can unsubscribe at any time.

Gold Outlook Report - Late 2017!

Get your FREE Updated Gold Outlook Report. Includes expert commentary, production numbers and gold stocks to keep an eye on.

Click here to get your free report!
Comments
  • Priscila Barrera’s article on Barrick Gold and problems at Acacia Mining reports that Acacia is responsible for a third of Barrick’s gold production. Are you sure about that figure? It doesn’t sound right as management has previously reported the production is less than 10% of Barrick’s gold production. Please correct the reporting. Thank you.

    Reply
    • Priscila

      Hi Charles,

      Thank you for your comment. You are correct! We’ve updated the article.

      Priscila

      Reply

Leave a Reply